Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
RUSTSEC-2026-0120
No affected components available
The NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation in hickory-net's
DnssecDnsHandle walks from the QNAME up to the SOA owner name, building a
list of candidate encloser names. The iterator used assumes the
QNAME is a descendant of the SOA owner, terminating only when the current
candidate equals the SOA name. When the SOA in a response's authority section
is not an ancestor of the QNAME, the loop stalls at the DNS root and never
terminates, repeatedly calling Name::base_name() and pushing newly allocated
Name and hashed-name entries into the candidate Vec.
The bug is reachable by any caller of DnssecDnsHandle — including the
resolver, recursor, and client — when built with the dnssec-ring or
dnssec-aws-lc-rs feature and configured to perform DNSSEC validation. It is
triggered while validating a NoData or NXDomain response whose authority
section contains an SOA record from a zone other than an ancestor of the
QNAME, on a code path that requires NSEC3 closest-encloser proof. In practice
this can be reached through an insecure CNAME chain that crosses zone
boundaries into a DNSSEC-signed zone returning NoData, but the minimum
condition is just a mismatched SOA owner on a response requiring NSEC3
validation.
A debug_assert_ne!(name, Name::root()) guards the loop body, so debug builds
abort with a panic on the first iteration past the root. Release builds
compile the assertion out and run the loop unbounded, allocating until the
process exhausts available memory (OOM). A reachable upstream attacker who
can return such a response can therefore crash a debug-built validator or
exhaust memory on a release-built one.
We recommend all affected users update to hickory-net 0.26.1 for the fix.
Measures severity based on intrinsic characteristics of the vulnerability, independent of environment.
No exploitation activity has been observed at this time. Continue routine monitoring.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard