Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

RUSTSEC-2025-0149

HighCVSS 7.3 / 10
Published Mar 12, 2025·Last modified Feb 8, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Below is a tool for recording and displaying system data like hardware utilization and cgroup information on Linux.

Symlink Attack in /var/log/below/error_root.log

Below's systemd service runs with full root privileges. It attempts to create a world-writable directory in /var/log/below. Even if the directory already exists, the Rust code ensures 1 that it receives mode 0777 permissions:

    if perm.mode() & 0o777 != 0o777 {
        perm.set_mode(0o777);
        match dir.set_permissions(perm) {
            Ok(()) => {}
            Err(e) => {
                bail!(
                    "Failed to set permissions on {}: {}",
                    path.to_string_lossy(),
                    e
                );
            }
        }
    }

This logic leads to different outcomes depending on the packaging on Linux distributions:

  • in openSUSE Tumbleweed the directory was packaged with 01755 permissions (below.spec 2 line 73), thus causing the set_permissions() call to run, resulting in a directory with mode 0777 during runtime.
  • in Gentoo Linux the directory is created with mode 01755 resulting in the same outcome as on openSUSE Tumbleweed (below.ebuild 3). Where the 01755 mode is exactly coming from is not fully clear, maybe the cargo build process assigns these permissions during installation.
  • in Fedora Linux the directory is packaged with 01777 permissions, thus the set_permissions() code will not run, because the if condition masks out the sticky bit. The directory stays at mode 01777 (rust-below.spec 4).
  • the Arch Linux AUR package 5 (maybe wrongly) does not pre-create the log directory. Thus the set_permissions() code will run and create the directory with mode 0777.

Below creates a log file in /var/log/below/error_root.log and assigns mode 0666 to it. This (somewhat confusingly) happens via a log_dir variable 6, which has been changed to point to the error_root.log file. The 0666 permission assignment to the logfile happens in logging::setup() 7, also accompanied by a somewhat strange comment in the code.

A local unprivileged attacker can stage a symlink attack in this location and cause an arbitrary file in the system to obtain 0666 permissions, likely leading to a full local root exploit, if done right, e.g. by pointing the symlink to /etc/shadow. Even if the file already exists it can be removed and replaced by a symlink, because of the world-writable directory permissions. The attack is thus not limited to scenarios in which the file has not yet been created by Below.

Further Issues

Even on Fedora Linux, where /var/log/below has "safe" 01777 permissions, there is a time window during which problems can arise. As long as below.service has not been started, another local user can pre-create /var/log/below/error_root.log and e.g. place a FIFO special file there. This will pose a local DoS against the below service, since it will fail to open the path and thus fail to start.

If /var/log/below were to be deleted for any reason, then Below would still recreate it using the bad 0777 mode permissions, which can also happen on distributions that initially package /var/log/below using permissions that do not trigger the set_permissions() call in Below's code.

Risk Scores
Base Score
7.3

The vulnerability requires local access to the device to be exploited. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
4.4

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.36%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard