Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
RHSA-2026:7443
No affected components available
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
- CVE-2025-11468
When folding a long comment in an email header containing exclusively unfoldable characters, the parenthesis would not be preserved. This could be used for injecting headers into email messages where addresses are user-controlled and not sanitized.
Upstream, EPSS 0.55% - CVE-2025-12084
When building nested elements using xml.dom.minidom methods such as appendChild() that have a dependency on _clear_id_cache() the algorithm is quadratic. Availability can be impacted when building excessively nested documents.
Upstream, EPSS 0.78% - CVE-2025-13462
The "tarfile" module would still apply normalization of AREGTYPE (\x00) blocks to DIRTYPE, even while processing a multi-block member such as GNUTYPE_LONGNAME or GNUTYPE_LONGLINK. This could result in a crafted tar archive being misinterpreted by the tarfile module compared to other implementations.
Upstream, EPSS 0.16% - CVE-2025-13836
When reading an HTTP response from a server, if no read amount is specified, the default behavior will be to use Content-Length. This allows a malicious server to cause the client to read large amounts of data into memory, potentially causing OOM or other DoS.
Upstream, EPSS 1.59% - CVE-2025-13837
When loading a plist file, the plistlib module reads data in size specified by the file itself, meaning a malicious file can cause OOM and DoS issues
Upstream, EPSS 0.22% - CVE-2025-15282
User-controlled data URLs parsed by urllib.request.DataHandler allow injecting headers through newlines in the data URL mediatype.
Upstream, EPSS 0.48% - CVE-2025-15367
The poplib module, when passed a user-controlled command, can have additional commands injected using newlines. Mitigation rejects commands containing control characters.
Upstream, EPSS 0.32% - CVE-2025-6075
If the value passed to os.path.expandvars() is user-controlled a performance degradation is possible when expanding environment variables.
Upstream, EPSS 0.14% - CVE-2025-8291
The 'zipfile' module would not check the validity of the ZIP64 End of Central Directory (EOCD) Locator record offset value would not be used to locate the ZIP64 EOCD record, instead the ZIP64 EOCD record would be assumed to be the previous record in the ZIP archive. This could be abused to create ZIP archives that are handled differently by the 'zipfile' module compared to other ZIP implementations. Remediation maintains this behavior, but checks that the offset specified in the ZIP64 EOCD Locator record matches the expected value.
Upstream, EPSS 0.35% - CVE-2026-0865
User-controlled header names and values containing newlines can allow injecting HTTP headers.
Upstream, EPSS 0.46% - CVE-2026-1299
The email module, specifically the "BytesGenerator" class, didn’t properly quote newlines for email headers when serializing an email message allowing for header injection when an email is serialized. This is only applicable if using "LiteralHeader" writing headers that don't respect email folding rules, the new behavior will reject the incorrectly folded headers in "BytesGenerator".
Upstream, EPSS 0.56% - CVE-2026-2297
The import hook in CPython that handles legacy *.pyc files (SourcelessFileLoader) is incorrectly handled in FileLoader (a base class) and so does not use io.open_code() to read the .pyc files. sys.audit handlers for this audit event therefore do not fire.
Upstream, EPSS 0.20% - CVE-2026-3446
When calling base64.b64decode() or related functions the decoding process would stop after encountering the first padded quad regardless of whether there was more information to be processed. This can lead to data being accepted which may be processed differently by other implementations. Use "validate=True" to enable stricter processing of base64 data.
Upstream, EPSS 0.19% - CVE-2026-3479
DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model. pkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.
Upstream, EPSS 0.24% - CVE-2026-3644
The fix for CVE-2026-0672, which rejected control characters in http.cookies.Morsel, was incomplete. The Morsel.update(), |= operator, and unpickling paths were not patched, allowing control characters to bypass input validation. Additionally, BaseCookie.js_output() lacked the output validation applied to BaseCookie.output().
Upstream, EPSS 0.42% - CVE-2026-4224
When an Expat parser with a registered ElementDeclHandler parses an inline document type definition containing a deeply nested content model a C stack overflow occurs.
Upstream, EPSS 0.62% - CVE-2026-4519
The webbrowser.open() API would accept leading dashes in the URL which could be handled as command line options for certain web browsers. New behavior rejects leading dashes. Users are recommended to sanitize URLs prior to passing to webbrowser.open().
Upstream, EPSS 0.31% - CVE-2026-5713
The "profiling.sampling" module (Python 3.15+) and "asyncio introspection capabilities" (3.14+, "python -m asyncio ps" and "python -m asyncio pstree") features could be used to read and write addresses in a privileged process if that process connected to a malicious or "infected" Python process via the remote debugging feature. This vulnerability requires persistently and repeatedly connecting to the process to be exploited, even after the connecting process crashes with high likelihood due to ASLR.
Upstream, EPSS 0.13% - EUVD-2025-200069Upstream
- EUVD-2025-200070Upstream
- EUVD-2025-201088Upstream
- EUVD-2025-206303Upstream
- EUVD-2025-206305Upstream
- EUVD-2025-206306Upstream
- EUVD-2025-208613Upstream
- EUVD-2025-31917Upstream
- EUVD-2025-37384Upstream
- EUVD-2026-12484Upstream
- EUVD-2026-12486Upstream
- EUVD-2026-12940Upstream
- EUVD-2026-13712Upstream
- EUVD-2026-21545Upstream
- EUVD-2026-22311Upstream
- EUVD-2026-3520Upstream
- EUVD-2026-4272Upstream
- EUVD-2026-9498Upstream
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard