Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
PYSEC-2026-1372
No affected components available
#Fickling's assessment
ctypes, importlib, runpy, code and multiprocessing were added the list of unsafe imports (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9a2b3f89bd0598b528d62c10a64c1986fcb09f66, https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/eb299b453342f1931c787bcb3bc33f3a03a173f9, https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/29d5545e74b07766892c1f0461b801afccee4f91, https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/b793563e60a5e039c5837b09d7f4f6b92e6040d1, https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/b793563e60a5e039c5837b09d7f4f6b92e6040d1).
Original report
Summary
The unsafe_imports() method in Fickling's static analyzer fails to flag several high-risk Python modules that can be used for arbitrary code execution. Malicious pickles importing these modules will not be detected as unsafe, allowing attackers to bypass Fickling's primary static safety checks.
Details
In fickling/fickle.py lines 866-884, the unsafe_imports() method checks imported modules against a hardcoded tuple:
def unsafe_imports(self) -> Iterator[ast.Import | ast.ImportFrom]:
for node in self.properties.imports:
if node.module in (
"__builtin__", "__builtins__", "builtins", "os", "posix", "nt",
"subprocess", "sys", "builtins", "socket", "pty", "marshal", "types",
):
yield node
This list is incomplete. The following dangerous modules are NOT detected:
- ctypes: Allows arbitrary memory access, calling C functions, and bypassing Python restrictions entirely
- importlib: Can dynamically import any module at runtime
- runpy: Can execute Python modules as scripts
- code: Can compile and execute arbitrary Python code
- multiprocessing: Can spawn processes with arbitrary code
Since ctypes is part of the Python standard library, it also bypasses the NonStandardImports analysis.
PoC
from fickling.fickle import Pickled
from fickling.analysis import check_safety, Severity
# Pickle that imports ctypes.pythonapi (allows arbitrary code execution)
# PROTO 4, GLOBAL 'ctypes pythonapi', STOP
payload = b'\x80\x04cctypes\npythonapi\n.'
pickled = Pickled.load(payload)
results = check_safety(pickled)
print(f"Severity: {results.severity.name}")
print(f"Is safe: {results.severity == Severity.LIKELY_SAFE}")
# Output: Severity is LIKELY_SAFE or low - the ctypes import is not flagged
# A truly malicious pickle using ctypes could execute arbitrary code
Impact
Security Bypass (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability)
An attacker can craft a malicious pickle that:
- Imports
ctypesto gain arbitrary memory access - Uses
ctypes.pythonapiorctypes.CDLLto execute arbitrary code - Passes Fickling's safety analysis as "likely safe"
- Executes malicious code when the victim loads the pickle after trusting Fickling's verdict
This undermines the core purpose of Fickling as a pickle safety scanner.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard