Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-x8gv-g2g3-65fj

HighCVSS 8.2 / 10
Published Oct 2, 2026·Last modified Oct 2, 2026
Affected Components(1)
Go logogithub.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
< 0.0.0-20260813142806-dd2778b70d02
Description

Security Advisory — SiYuan Agent Tools SSRF via DNS-Rebinding TOCTOU (Bypass of CheckHostSSRF)

| Field | Value | |---|---| | Disclosed by | joysinleung (joysinleung@gmail.com) | | Report date | 2026-08-13 | | Product | SiYuan (思源笔记) — siyuan-note/siyuan | | Go module | github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | | Affected versions | <= 3.8.0 (latest release at report time; dynamically verified on v3.8.0) | | Patched versions | 3.8.1 | | Component | kernel/util/httprequest.go (CheckHostSSRF), kernel/mcp/tools/http_request.go, kernel/util/webfetch.go, kernel/util/net.go (SSRFSafeDialer) | | Relationship to prior advisory | Incomplete-fix variant of GHSA-rg26-cg95-gq6p (SSRF main-vector remediation). See §Relationship. | | EPSS (exploitation probability) | Low–Moderate. Requires the attacker to influence an AI Agent / MCP client into fetching an attacker-controlled domain (prompt-injection scenario documented by the tool itself). | | KEV (CISA Known Exploited) | No (not listed in CISA KEV at report time). | | Default-config reachable | Yes — exploitable under both SafeMode on and off; only requires the agent http_request / web_fetch tool to be reachable (default AI tooling). |


Summary

SiYuan's AI Agent tools http_request (util.HTTPRequest) and web_fetch (util.WebFetch) are the only SSRF gate for outbound requests from the kernel. That gate is CheckHostSSRF, which performs a single DNS resolution at guard time and checks whether any returned IP is private/loopback/link-local. The actual connection, however, performs a second, independent DNS resolution through the default net.Dialer — and no connect-time private-IP check is mounted on this path.

Because the two resolutions are not pinned to the same result, an attacker-controlled domain can answer the guard-resolution with a public IP (passing CheckHostSSRF) and the connect-resolution with a private/loopback/metadata IP (e.g. 169.254.169.254). This is a classic DNS-rebinding TOCTOU that bypasses the SSRF defense entirely. It reaches cloud instance metadata and internal services that the guard was specifically added to block.

Relationship to Prior Advisories

  • GHSA-rg26-cg95-gq6p remediated the SSRF main vector by adding CheckHostSSRF (parse-time) and SSRFSafeDialer (connect-time). However, the agent tool paths (http_request / web_fetch) only received the parse-time half: they call CheckHostSSRF but then connect via httpclient.NewBrowserRequest(), whose transport does not mount SSRFSafeDialer. Even where SSRFSafeDialer is mounted, it only blocks private IPs when SafeMode == true (default false), so it would not help here regardless. The sibling path openai.go:generatedImageDialer does mount a connect-time Control hook (blocking private/loopback/link-local/100.64/198.18), proving the project knows the technique — the agent path is a clear omission. We report this as an incomplete-fix variant with a concrete v3.8.0 reproduction.
  • CVE-2026-32110 (GHSA-56cv-c5p2-j2wg) covered the older forwardProxy endpoint and is unrelated to the agent tool path.

Affected Version

Dynamically verified on v3.8.0 (tag v3.8.0, commit 251596fc0). A process-level DNS hijack was installed so that the attacker domain rebind.local returns a public IP (203.0.113.1) on odd (guard) resolutions and 127.0.0.1 on even (connect) resolutions; a loopback "victim" service returned F9_REBIND_PROOF=reached-internal-only-service-via-TOCTOU. Both util.HTTPRequest("GET", "http://rebind.local:<port>/secret") and util.WebFetch(...) returned the internal-only proof body, while CheckHostSSRF("127.0.0.1") directly blocked and the legit public domain pub.local passed — confirming the guard passed but the connection hit the internal address. All versions <= 3.8.0 are affected.

Component

  • kernel/util/httprequest.go:42 CheckHostSSRF — single net.LookupIP + isPrivateIP at guard time only.
  • kernel/mcp/tools/http_request.go:90 → util.HTTPRequest; kernel/util/webfetch.go:50 → CheckHostSSRF + httpclient.NewBrowserRequest().
  • github.com/siyuan-note/httpclient client.go:92 NewBrowserRequest uses the default http.Transport → default net.Dialer with no SSRFSafeDialer.
  • kernel/util/net.go:151 SSRFSafeDialer exists but is (a) not mounted on the agent path and (b) only active under SafeMode.
  • Correctly-defended sibling: kernel/util/openai.go:829 generatedImageDialer mounts a connect-time Control hook.

Attack Vector

Network + AI Agent. The url of http_request / web_fetch is fully controlled by the agent / MCP client. In SiYuan's documented red-team scenario ("prompt-inject the agent → induce it to visit an attacker domain"), the attacker needs only a rebinding domain (own authoritative DNS, first answer public, later 169.254.169.254 / internal). No auth, no special position beyond prompting the agent. Real targets: cloud metadata 169.254.169.254 (IMDSv1 IAM creds) and same-host/internal unauthenticated services.

Proof of Concept

# Attacker authoritative DNS for rebind.local:
#   odd  query (guard)  -> 203.0.113.1   (public, passes CheckHostSSRF)
#   even query (dial)   -> 127.0.0.1     (loopback internal victim)
#
# Directly invoke the real agent-tool functions (v3.8.0 code path):
util.HTTPRequest("GET", "http://rebind.local:15353/secret", ...)
util.WebFetch("http://rebind.local:15353/secret", ...)

# Result (evidence):
#   body = "F9_REBIND_PROOF=reached-internal-only-service-via-TOCTOU"
# Negative control: CheckHostSSRF("127.0.0.1") -> blocked.
# Positive control: CheckHostSSRF("pub.local") -> 203.0.113.1, allowed.

The loopback victim is a faithful stand-in for 169.254.169.254 / any internal address: the guard allowed a public IP while the connection reached a private one.

Impact

Confidentiality breach via SSRF: an attacker who can steer the agent can read cloud instance metadata (IAM temporary credentials), internal service responses, and anything reachable from the SiYuan kernel's network position. Scope is changed (S:C) because the kernel often runs with cloud-instance privileges. Exploitable under default config (SafeMode on or off).

Scope

Reachable whenever the agent http_request / web_fetch tool is usable (default AI tooling). Independent of Publish/auth configuration. Not gated by SafeMode.

Remediation

  1. Connect-time enforcement (preferred): mount SSRFSafeDialer (or a dedicated always-on private-IP Control hook) on the transport used by http_request / web_fetch, independent of SafeMode — matching the already-correct generatedImageDialer.
  2. Pin resolution: after CheckHostSSRF passes, reuse the same resolved IP for the connection (or short-TTL cache) so guard and dial cannot diverge.
  3. Minimum change: replace httpclient.NewBrowserRequest() in http_request.go / webfetch.go with a custom client whose DialContext is util.SSRFSafeDialer(timeout).DialContext (not SafeMode-gated).

Note: patch authored against v3.8.0 source; regression-tested in the researcher's environment for the PoC path but not compiled into a full SiYuan release build. Provided for the maintainer to validate in CI.


Appendix: Suggested Patch (F9)

diff --git a/kernel/util/httprequest.go b/kernel/util/httprequest.go
index aaa..bbb 100644
--- a/kernel/util/httprequest.go
+++ b/kernel/util/httprequest.go
@@ -40,6 +40,18 @@ func CheckHostSSRF(host string) error {
 	return nil
 }
 
+// SSRFSafeClient returns an *http.Client whose transport enforces the
+// private/loopback/link-local IP block at CONNECT time (independent of SafeMode),
+// closing the DNS-rebinding TOCTOU left by parse-time-only CheckHostSSRF.
+func SSRFSafeClient(timeout time.Duration) *http.Client {
+	return &http.Client{
+		Timeout: timeout,
+		Transport: &http.Transport{
+			DialContext: util.SSRFSafeDialer(timeout).DialContext,
+		},
+	}
+}
+
 diff --git a/kernel/mcp/tools/http_request.go b/kernel/mcp/tools/http_request.go
 index ccc..ddd 100644
--- a/kernel/mcp/tools/http_request.go
+++ b/kernel/mcp/tools/http_request.go
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ func httpRequest(args map[string]any) (CallToolResult, error) {
 	if serr := util.CheckHostSSRF(u.Hostname()); serr != nil {
 		return CallToolResult{}, serr
 	}
-	resp, err := httpclient.NewBrowserRequest().Get(rawURL)
+	resp, err := util.SSRFSafeClient(30 * time.Second).Get(rawURL)
 	...
 }
 diff --git a/kernel/util/webfetch.go b/kernel/util/webfetch.go
 index eee..fff 100644
--- a/kernel/util/webfetch.go
+++ b/kernel/util/webfetch.go
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ func WebFetch(rawURL string, ...) (string, error) {
 	if serr := util.CheckHostSSRF(u.Hostname()); serr != nil {
 		return "", serr
 	}
-	resp, err := httpclient.NewBrowserRequest().Get(rawURL)
+	resp, err := util.SSRFSafeClient(30 * time.Second).Get(rawURL)
 	...
 }
Upload your SBOM

Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.

Risk Scores
Base Score
8.2

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.

Threat Intelligence
7.5

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.36%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard