Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-x6m9-38vm-2xhf
No affected components available
Summary
TemplateContext.Reset() claims that a TemplateContext can be reused safely on the same thread, but it does not clear CachedTemplates. If an application pools TemplateContext objects and uses an ITemplateLoader that resolves content per request, tenant, or user, a previously authorized include can be served to later renders without calling TemplateLoader.Load() again.
Details
The relevant code path is:
TemplateContext.Reset()only clears output, globals, cultures, and source files insrc/Scriban/TemplateContext.cslines 877–902.CachedTemplatesis initialized once and kept on the context insrc/Scriban/TemplateContext.csline 197.includeresolves templates throughIncludeFunction.Invoke()insrc/Scriban/Functions/IncludeFunction.cslines 29–43.IncludeFunction.Invoke()callsTemplateContext.GetOrCreateTemplate()insrc/Scriban/TemplateContext.cslines 1249–1256.- If a template path is already present in
CachedTemplates, Scriban returns the cached compiled template and does not callTemplateLoader.Load()again.
This becomes a security issue when ITemplateLoader.Load() returns request-dependent content. A first render can prime the cache with an admin-only or tenant-specific template, and later renders on the same reused TemplateContext will receive that stale template even after Reset().
Proof of Concept
Setup
mkdir scriban-poc1
cd scriban-poc1
dotnet new console --framework net8.0
dotnet add package Scriban --version 6.6.0
Program.cs
using Scriban;
using Scriban.Parsing;
using Scriban.Runtime;
var loader = new SwitchingLoader();
var context = new TemplateContext
{
TemplateLoader = loader,
};
var template = Template.Parse("{{ include 'profile' }}");
loader.Content = "admin-only";
Console.WriteLine("first=" + template.Render(context));
context.Reset();
loader.Content = "guest-view";
Console.WriteLine("second=" + template.Render(context));
sealed class SwitchingLoader : ITemplateLoader
{
public string Content { get; set; } = string.Empty;
public string GetPath(TemplateContext context, SourceSpan callerSpan, string templateName) => templateName;
public string Load(TemplateContext context, SourceSpan callerSpan, string templatePath) => Content;
public ValueTask<string> LoadAsync(TemplateContext context, SourceSpan callerSpan, string templatePath)
=> new(Content);
}
Run
dotnet run
Actual Output
first=admin-only
second=admin-only
Expected Output
first=admin-only
second=guest-view
The second render should reload the template after Reset(), but it instead reuses the cached compiled template from the previous render.
Impact
This is a cross-render data isolation issue. Any application that reuses TemplateContext objects and uses a request-dependent ITemplateLoader can leak previously authorized template content across requests, users, or tenants.
The issue impacts applications that:
- Pool or reuse
TemplateContext - Call
Reset()between requests - Use
include - Resolve include content based on request-specific state
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard