Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Checkout DevGuardView on GitHub
Search

GHSA-wqcw-g35j-j578

MediumCVSS 4.3 / 10
Published May 5, 2026·Last modified May 5, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Impact

Kubewarden is a policy engine for Kubernetes. Kubewarden cluster operators can grant permissions to users to deploy namespaced AdmissionPolicies and AdmissionPolicyGroups in their Namespaces. One of Kubewarden promises is that configured users can deploy namespaced policies in a safe manner, without privilege escalation.

An attacker with privileged AdmissionPolicy or AdmissionPolicyGroup create permissions (which isn't the default) can craft a policy that makes use of the can_i host callback. The callback issues a SubjectAccessReview (SAR) requests to enumerate RBAC permissions of any user or service account across the cluster. Three operations on the host capabilities kubewarden/kubernetes binding enforce the context-aware allow-list via can_access_kubernetes_resource():

  • list_resources_by_namespace
  • list_resources_all
  • get_resource

However, can_i does not perform that check and forwards the request directly to the callback handler, which executes a real SubjectAccessReview using policy-server privileges. This creates a policy-level authorization gap: can_i is effectively usable even when the policy has no context-aware resource grant.

This is an information disclosure / reconnaissance issue, and not direct workload data exfiltration. The attacker learns permission information, such as whether specific service accounts can "get secrets", "create pods", or "bind clusterroles" in chosen namespaces.

Patches

Cluster Operators, if providing their users with privileges to deploy AdmissionPolicies or AdmissionPolicygroups (which isn't the default), must then also deploy PolicyServers with reduced permissions for host capability calls. This includes the PolicyServer default. For that, make use of the new feature in v1.35:

  • For custom PolicyServers: Set the new PolicyServer.spec.namespacedPoliciesCapabilities , for example to an empty list [] which doesn't allow any capability.
  • For the default PolicyServer, set the .Values.policyServer.namespacedPoliciesCapabilities , for example to an empty list [] which doesn't allow any capability.

Also, if needed, they must ensure that those namespaced AdmissionPolicies or AdmissionPolicygroups are scheduled in the PolicyServers with reduced permissions. For that, they could make use of the new ns-policyserver-mapper policy, their own policy or other means, such as GitOps.

See: https://docs.kubewarden.io/howtos/policy-servers/namespaced-policies-capabilities

Workarounds

Cluster Operators can opt for:

  • Not allowing users to create namespaced policies (AdmissionPolicies, AdmissionPolicyGroups).
  • Removing SubjectAccessReview "create" permissions for the PolicyServer ServiceAccount RBAC being used, in custom PolicyServers and the PolicyServer default.

Resources

  • Code changes, with new security feature: https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller/pull/1693
  • Documentation changes: https://github.com/kubewarden/docs/pull/737
    • Explained new feature on 1.35.0
    • Updated Threat model assessment
Risk Scores
Base Score
4.3

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.

Threat Intelligence
4.0

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.17%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Related Vulnerabilities

Browse More

Medium severity
Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard