Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-wgh7-54f2-x98r
No affected components available
An integer overflow in MetaDataBuilder.checkSize allows for HTTP/2 HPACK header values to
exceed their size limit.
In MetaDataBuilder.java, the following code determines if a header name or value
exceeds the size limit, and throws an exception if the limit is exceeded:
291 public void checkSize(int length, boolean huffman) throws SessionException
292 {
293 // Apply a huffman fudge factor
294 if (huffman)
295 length = (length * 4) / 3;
296 if ((_size + length) > _maxSize)
297 throw new HpackException.SessionException("Header too large %d > %d",
_size + length, _maxSize);
298 }
However, when length is very large and huffman is true, the multiplication by 4 in line 295 will overflow, and length will become negative. (_size+length) will now be negative, and the check on line 296 will not be triggered.
Furthermore, MetaDataBuilder.checkSize allows for user-entered HPACK header value sizes to be
negative, potentially leading to a very large buffer allocation later on when the
user-entered size is multiplied by 2.
In MetaDataBuilder.java, the following code determines if a header name or value
exceeds the size limit, and throws an exception if the limit is exceeded:
public void checkSize(int length, boolean huffman) throws SessionException
{
// Apply a huffman fudge factor
if (huffman)
length = (length * 4) / 3;
if ((_size + length) > _maxSize)
throw new HpackException.SessionException("Header too large %d > %d", _size
+ length, _maxSize);
}
However, no exception is thrown in the case of a negative size.
Later, in Huffman.decode, the user-entered length is multiplied by 2 before allocating a buffer:
public static String decode(ByteBuffer buffer, int length) throws
HpackException.CompressionException
{
Utf8StringBuilder utf8 = new Utf8StringBuilder(length * 2);
// ...
This means that if a user provides a negative length value (or, more precisely, a length value which, when multiplied by the 4/3 fudge factor, is negative), and this length value is a very large positive number when multiplied by 2, then the user can cause a very large buffer to be allocated on the server.
Exploit Scenario 1
An attacker repeatedly sends HTTP messages with the HPACK header 0x00ffffffffff02. Each time this header is decoded:
HpackDecode.decodewill determine that a Huffman-coded value of length 805306494 needs to be decoded.MetaDataBuilder.checkSizewill approve this length.- Huffman.decode will allocate a 1.6 GB string array.
- Huffman.decode will have a buffer overflow error, and the array will be deallocated the next time garbage collection happens. (Note: this can be delayed by appending valid huffman-coded characters to the end of the header.)
Depending on the timing of garbage collection, the number of threads, and the amount of memory available on the server, this may cause the server to run out of memory.
Exploit Scenario 2
An attacker repeatedly sends HTTP messages with the HPACK header 0x00ff8080ffff0b. Each time this header is decoded:
- HpackDecode.decode will determine that a Huffman-coded value of length -1073758081 needs to be decoded
- MetaDataBuilder.checkSize will approve this length
- The number will be multiplied by 2 to get 2147451134, and Huffman.decode will allocate a 2.1 GB string array
- Huffman.decode will have a buffer overflow error, and the array will be deallocated the next time garbage collection happens (Note that this deallocation can be delayed by adding valid Huffman-coded characters to the end of the header)
Depending on the timing of garbage collection, the number of threads, and the amount of memory available on the server, this may cause the server to run out of memory.
Impact
Users of HTTP/2 can be impacted by a remote denial of service attack.
Patches
Fixed in Jetty 10.0.16 and Jetty 11.0.16 Fixed in Jetty 9.4.53 Jetty 12.x is unaffected.
Workarounds
No workarounds possible, only patched versions of Jetty.
References
- https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/pull/9634
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard