Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8
No affected components available
Summary
When an authenticated recipient of a single-file share opens the file event stream (GET /api/v4/file/events?uri=<share-root>), Cloudreve validates the URI by listing it and then subscribes the caller to parent.ID(). For a single-file share, the share navigator resolves the bare share-root URI to the owner-side parent folder of the shared file (not the file), while the visible listing is filtered down to just the shared file. The event hub then keys topics by numeric file ID only and, on each file change, fans the event out to subscribers of every ancestor topic, filtering only the client ID that caused the event — never the subscriber's share scope.
Consequently, a recipient of one shared file can receive Server-Sent Events (type, sibling path/name, rename target, hashed file ID) for other files and subfolders in the owner's parent folder that were never shared. Contents are not disclosed; file-activity metadata is.
Details
Root cause (verified at 26b6b10)
1. Events route — authenticated, feature-flagged, no share-scope check (routers/router.go):
file := v4.Group("file"); file.Use(middleware.RequiredScopes(types.ScopeFilesRead))
file.GET("events",
middleware.LoginRequired(),
middleware.IsFunctionEnabled(func(c *gin.Context) bool { return dep.SettingProvider().EventHubEnabled(c) }),
controllers.FromQuery[explorer.ExplorerEventService](...), controllers.HandleExplorerEventsPush)
EventHubEnabled defaults true (inventory/setting.go: "fs_event_push_enabled":"1").
2. Service subscribes to the listed parent's ID (service/explorer/events.go):
parent, _, err := m.List(c, uri, &manager.ListArgs{Page:0, PageSize:1}) // also runs share validity/password
...
rx, resumed, err := eventHub.Subscribe(c, parent.ID(), requestInfo.ClientID)
3. Single-file share Root swaps the share root to the owner parent (share_navigator.go):
n.shareRoot = newFile(nil, share.Edges.File)
...
if n.shareRoot.Type() == types.FileTypeFile {
n.singleFileShare = true
n.shareRoot = n.shareRoot.Parent // <-- owner-side parent folder
}
4. To returns that parent for the bare root URI (share_navigator.go):
elements := path.Elements()
if len(elements) == 1 && n.singleFileShare { return latestSharedSingleFile(...) } // only when URI names the file
...
return current // current == shareRoot == owner parent folder
The bare root share URI has zero path elements (URI.Elements() returns nil for path /), so the len(elements)==1 guard is skipped and To returns the parent folder. dbfs.List returns that as parent, so parent.ID() is the owner parent folder's real ID.
5. Children masks the broader parent — for singleFileShare it returns only []*File{sharedFile}, so the recipient's listing shows just the shared file even though the subscribed topic is the whole parent.
6. Publication fans out to ancestor topics with only a client-ID filter (dbfs/events.go):
func (f *DBFS) getEligibleSubscriber(ctx, file, checkParentPerm) []foundSubscriber {
roots := file.Ancestors()
for _, root := range roots {
subscribers := f.eventHub.GetSubscribers(ctx, root.Model.ID)
subscribers = lo.Filter(subscribers, func(s eventhub.Subscriber, _ int) bool {
return !(requestInfo != nil && s.ID() == requestInfo.ClientID) // ONLY exclude the causing client
})
...
}
}
// emit*: From: subscriber.relativePath(file) // owner-side path of the changed sibling
relativePath trims the changed file's owner path by the subscribed root's owner path, yielding the sibling's name (e.g. /Secret-Plan.pdf). No check that the subscriber is authorized for the changed file or within their share scope.
Validation performed
Independent validation against commit 26b6b10 in a clean sandbox.
Source-verified (static): all of (1)–(6) confirmed verbatim, including the negative direction (an explicit …/shared.txt URI resolves to the file, and oss/qiniu-style flows are irrelevant here).
Dynamic (control-flow executed): the full binary is not buildable offline (modules behind an unreachable proxy, embedded frontend, DB/eventhub). The reseacher ran two harnesses:
- A
net/url-based check of the linchpin — the bare root share URI yields0path elements (soToreturns the parent), while…/shared.txtyields1(returns the file). This is the subtle point on which the whole finding turns, and it holds. - A model of
Root/To/getEligibleSubscriber/relativePathdriving the end-to-end flow:
[1] single-file share root URI -> m.List parent = "docs" (id 10), NOT shared.txt (id 11) -> subscribed to owner parent
[2] owner renames /docs/Secret-Plan.pdf -> client 'attacker' receives: from="/Secret-Plan.pdf" file_id=12 (topic 10)
[3] CONTROL: event caused by attacker's own client id -> suppressed (the only filter)
[4] CONTROL: explicit URI 'shared.txt' -> resolves to file (id 11) -> no sibling events
Steps to reproduce
- Owner shares a single file
shared.txtfrom/docs, which also containsSecret-Plan.pdf. - Recipient (logged-in,
Files.Read, with the share password if any) opens the event stream on the share root:GET /api/v4/file/events?uri=cloudreve%3A%2F%2F<share-id>%40share Cookie: cloudreve-session=<recipient-session> X-Cr-Client-Id: <uuid> Accept: text/event-stream - Owner creates/renames/modifies/moves/deletes
Secret-Plan.pdf. - The recipient's stream receives, e.g.:
event: event data: {"type":"rename","file_id":"<hashed>","from":"/Secret-Plan.pdf","to":"/Secret-Plan-v2.pdf"}
Expected: the recipient only receives events for the shared file. Actual: the recipient receives activity events for unshared siblings in the owner's parent folder.
Impact
A single-file share recipient gains a real-time feed of file-activity metadata for the owner's parent folder — sibling names, operation types, and rename targets they were never granted access to. No file contents are exposed.
Remediation
- For single-file shares, subscribe to the shared file's ID, or reject event subscriptions on the single-file share root view.
- Store an authorization scope (navigator/share root) per subscriber and publish only events whose path stays within that scope.
- Incorporate user/share scope into topic keys, not just file ID + client ID.
- On subscriber reactivation, re-verify the requester still matches the subscriber and is authorized for the topic.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
- CVE-2026-55499Alias
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard