Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-vxr8-fq34-vvx9
No affected components available
Impact
A DOMPurify instance that is reused across trust boundaries can stay bound to a previously supplied TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY even after clearConfig() is called. A later caller that requests RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE receives a TrustedHTML object created by the old policy, not by a clean default configuration.
If the old policy is unsafe or controlled by a less-trusted integration, this turns a later "default" sanitize call into script execution at a Trusted Types sink. TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: null on the later call also does not clear the retained policy.
dompurify-trusted-types-policy-survives-clearconfig-poc.js
Affected version
Tested against DOMPurify 3.4.8, repository commit 825e617753ac1169306a542d3174a77f717a0cf6.
Root cause
_parseConfig() overwrites trustedTypesPolicy when cfg.TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY is truthy, but the default/null path only initializes the internal policy when trustedTypesPolicy === undefined. Once a custom policy has been set, later default config parsing leaves it in place.
Relevant code:
src/purify.ts:786-812accepts and storescfg.TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY.src/purify.ts:813-832does not reset an existing policy when config has no policy or hasTRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: null.src/purify.ts:2123-2125signs the final serialized HTML with the retained policy whenRETURN_TRUSTED_TYPEis true.src/purify.ts:2133-2136clearConfig()only clearsCONFIGandSET_CONFIG; it does not resettrustedTypesPolicyoremptyHTML.
Local PoC
Run from the DOMPurify checkout, or set DOMPURIFY_REPO:
node /home/dompurify-trusted-types-policy-survives-clearconfig-poc.js
Observed output:
{
"result": {
"baseline": "<b>baseline</b>",
"duringPolicy": "<img src=x onerror=alert(\"TT_POLICY_SURVIVED_CLEARCONFIG\")>",
"afterClearString": "<img src=\"x\">",
"afterClearTrustedType": "[object TrustedHTML]",
"afterClearTrusted": "<img src=x onerror=alert(\"TT_POLICY_SURVIVED_CLEARCONFIG\")>",
"afterNullTrusted": "<img src=x onerror=alert(\"TT_POLICY_SURVIVED_CLEARCONFIG\")>",
"mountedHTML": "<img src=\"x\" onerror=\"alert("TT_POLICY_SURVIVED_CLEARCONFIG")\">"
},
"dialogs": [
"TT_POLICY_SURVIVED_CLEARCONFIG"
]
}
The important part is the split behavior after cleanup:
purify.clearConfig(); purify.sanitize(...);returns a normal sanitized string (<img src="x">), because the later call is not asking for a Trusted Type.purify.clearConfig(); purify.sanitize(..., { RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE: true });still uses the old policy and returns attacker-controlledTrustedHTML.- Passing
{ TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: null, RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE: true }also still returns attacker-controlledTrustedHTML.
Preconditions
This is a shared-instance state contamination issue. It matters when one DOMPurify instance is reused by multiple integrations, plugins, request handlers, or components with different trust levels, and a cleanup step relies on clearConfig() to restore safe defaults.
This is not a default string-input bypass. An attacker must be able to influence a prior TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY on the reused instance, or a less-trusted integration must have installed an unsafe policy.
Severity
impact is XSS at a Trusted Types sink in applications that reuse a DOMPurify instance across trust boundaries. Attack complexity is high because exploitation depends on prior policy injection or a less-trusted integration and a later RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE sink.
Suggested fix
Make clearConfig() reset Trusted Types state as part of restoring defaults, or have _parseConfig() explicitly clear trustedTypesPolicy and emptyHTML when TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: null is supplied.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard