Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-v9jr-rg53-9pgp
No affected components available
Summary
DOMPurify versions 3.0.1 through 3.3.3 (latest) are vulnerable to a prototype pollution-based XSS bypass. When an application uses DOMPurify.sanitize() with the default configuration (no CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING option), a prior prototype pollution gadget can inject permissive tagNameCheck and attributeNameCheck regex values into Object.prototype, causing DOMPurify to allow arbitrary custom elements with arbitrary attributes — including event handlers — through sanitization.
Affected Versions
- 3.0.1 through 3.3.3 (current latest) — all affected
- 3.0.0 and all 2.x versions — NOT affected (used
Object.create(null)for initialization, no|| {}reassignment) - The vulnerable
|| {}reassignment was introduced in the 3.0.0→3.0.1 refactor - This is distinct from GHSA-cj63-jhhr-wcxv (USE_PROFILES Array.prototype pollution, fixed in 3.3.2)
- This is distinct from CVE-2024-45801 / GHSA-mmhx-hmjr-r674 (__depth prototype pollution, fixed in 3.1.3)
Root Cause
In purify.js at line 590, during config parsing:
CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING = cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING || {};
When no CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING is specified in the config (the default usage pattern), cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING is undefined, and the fallback {} is used. This plain object inherits from Object.prototype.
Lines 591-598 then check cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING (the original config property) — which is undefined — so the conditional blocks that would set tagNameCheck and attributeNameCheck from the config are never entered.
As a result, CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagNameCheck and CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING.attributeNameCheck resolve via the prototype chain. If an attacker has polluted Object.prototype.tagNameCheck and Object.prototype.attributeNameCheck with permissive values (e.g., /.*/), these polluted values flow into DOMPurify's custom element validation at lines 973-977 and attribute validation, causing all custom elements and all attributes to be allowed.
Impact
- Attack type: XSS bypass via prototype pollution chain
- Prerequisites: Attacker must have a prototype pollution primitive in the same execution context (e.g., vulnerable version of lodash, jQuery.extend, query-string parser, deep merge utility, or any other PP gadget)
- Config required: Default. No special DOMPurify configuration needed. The standard
DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput)call is affected. - Payload: Any HTML custom element (name containing a hyphen) with event handler attributes survives sanitization
Proof of Concept
// Step 1: Attacker exploits a prototype pollution gadget elsewhere in the application
Object.prototype.tagNameCheck = /.*/;
Object.prototype.attributeNameCheck = /.*/;
// Step 2: Application sanitizes user input with DEFAULT config
const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize('<x-x onfocus=alert(document.cookie) tabindex=0 autofocus>');
// Step 3: "Sanitized" output still contains the event handler
console.log(clean);
// Output: <x-x onfocus="alert(document.cookie)" tabindex="0" autofocus="">
// Step 4: When injected into DOM, XSS executes
document.body.innerHTML = clean; // alert() fires
Tested configurations that are vulnerable:
| Call Pattern | Vulnerable? |
|---|---|
| DOMPurify.sanitize(input) | YES |
| DOMPurify.sanitize(input, {}) | YES |
| DOMPurify.sanitize(input, { CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: null }) | YES |
| DOMPurify.sanitize(input, { CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {} }) | NO (explicit object triggers L591 path) |
Suggested Fix
Change line 590 from:
CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING = cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING || {};
To:
CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING = cfg.CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING || create(null);
The create(null) function (already used elsewhere in DOMPurify, e.g., in clone()) creates an object with no prototype, preventing prototype chain inheritance.
Alternative application-level mitigation:
Applications can protect themselves by always providing an explicit CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING in their config:
DOMPurify.sanitize(input, {
CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING: {
tagNameCheck: null,
attributeNameCheck: null
}
});
Timeline
- 2026-04-04: Vulnerability discovered during automated DOMPurify fuzzing research (Fermat project)
- 2026-04-04: Confirmed in Chrome browser with DOMPurify 3.3.3
- 2026-04-04: Verified distinct from GHSA-cj63-jhhr-wcxv and CVE-2024-45801
- 2026-04-04: Advisory drafted, responsible disclosure initiated
Credit
https://github.com/trace37labs
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard