Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-rw74-vc9h-534j

LowCVSS 3.5 / 10
Published Apr 29, 2026·Last modified May 8, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

Several administrative operations in Admidio's preferences module (database backup, test email, htaccess generation) fire via GET requests with no CSRF token validation. Because SameSite=Lax cookies travel with top-level GET navigations, an attacker forces an authenticated admin to trigger these actions from a malicious page.

Details

In modules/preferences.php, the backup, test_email, and htaccess modes accept GET parameters with no CSRF token check:

// modules/preferences.php - backup mode
case 'backup':
    // Creates full database dump and serves as download
    // No CSRF token validation
    $backupFile = $gDb->backup();
    // ... sends file to client
    break;

case 'test_email':
    // Sends test email from the server
    // No CSRF token validation
    break;

case 'htaccess':
    // Writes .htaccess file to disk
    // No CSRF token validation
    break;

The save mode in the same file validates CSRF via getFormObject(), confirming the developers intended CSRF protection but did not apply it to these other modes.

Because these are GET requests, SameSite=Lax browsers include session cookies on top-level cross-origin navigations, making CSRF exploitation trivial.

Proof of Concept

Simplified attacker page (csrf.html hosted on attacker origin):

<html>
<body>
<h1>Loading...</h1>
<!-- Trigger backup creation on victim's browser -->
<script>window.location = 'https://target-admidio.example.com/adm_program/modules/preferences.php?mode=backup';</script>
</body>
</html>

When an administrator visits this page, the browser navigates to the Admidio backup URL with full session cookies. The server generates a database dump and serves it as a download to the victim's browser. Note: the backup downloads to the victim's machine, not to the attacker. The attacker cannot read the response cross-origin.

For htaccess mode, the CSRF overwrites the .htaccess file on the server, disrupting the application. For test_email mode, it triggers email sends from the server, which an attacker can abuse for spam or to probe internal email infrastructure.

Impact

An attacker tricks an Admidio administrator into visiting a malicious page that triggers state-changing operations on the server:

  • Backup creation: forces the server to generate a full database dump. The backup downloads to the victim's browser, not to the attacker. However, repeated backup triggers can cause disk I/O and storage pressure on the server.
  • htaccess modification: overwrites the server's .htaccess file, breaking URL routing or disabling security headers.
  • Test email: fires email sends from the server, usable as a spam relay or to probe internal mail configuration.

The core issue is that state-changing operations run via unprotected GET requests. The victim only needs to visit a single attacker-controlled page while logged in.

Recommended Fix

  1. Change backup, test_email, and htaccess operations to require POST requests.
  2. Add CSRF token validation using the existing getFormObject() mechanism.
  3. As defense in depth, set SameSite=Strict on session cookies or add a confirmation step for destructive operations like database backup.

Found by aisafe.io

Risk Scores
Base Score
3.5

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs high-level or administrative privileges. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data. There is a low impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
3.2

Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.

EPSS
0.12%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard