Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-rcw4-f5rp-g42v

HighCVSS 7.5 / 10
Published Sep 29, 2026·Last modified Sep 29, 2026
Affected Components(1)
npm logoadm-zip
< 0.6.1
Description

Affected package: adm-zip (npm) Affected version: 0.6.0

Summary

The fix shipped for CVE-2026-39244 (methods/inflater.js) caps zlib's decompression output via maxOutputLength: expectedLength, where expectedLength is read directly from the ZIP entry's attacker-controlled "uncompressed size" header field (CENLEN/LOCLEN). This cap is only applied when expectedLength > 0:

const option = version >= 15 && expectedLength > 0 ? { maxOutputLength: expectedLength } : {};
return zlib.inflateRawSync(inbuf, option);

If an attacker sets the declared uncompressed-size field to exactly 0, this condition is false, option becomes {}, and no output cap is passed to zlib at all. Node then falls back to zlib's own internal default limit (several GB), so a small, highly-compressible payload can still be decompressed to a very large size in memory -- the same class of resource-exhaustion issue the original CVE addressed, just triggered differently.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Build a ZIP archive containing one DEFLATE-compressed entry whose real content is highly redundant (e.g. several MB of a repeated byte, achieving close to the ~1032:1 theoretical raw-DEFLATE compression ratio).
  2. Patch the entry's declared uncompressed-size fields (both the local file header copy and the central directory copy, 4-byte little-endian values) to 0. The compressed bytes and CRC32 are left untouched -- CRC validation still passes because CRC is computed over the real decompressed output, not the declared size.
  3. Load the archive with new AdmZip(buffer) and call .getEntries()[0].getData() (or readFile/readAsText/extractAllTo/etc. -- all share the same code path).
  4. Observe: decompression succeeds and returns the full-size buffer with no size restriction applied, whereas the same real data with an honest (but undersized) declared value correctly throws Cannot create a Buffer larger than N bytes.

Proof of Concept

Attached script demonstrates a controlled A/B comparison using the identical real payload in both cases -- only the declared-size header field differs:

  • Control (declared size = 1024 bytes, deliberately smaller than the true 4MB output): correctly throws, proving the cap mechanism works when expectedLength > 0.
  • Bypass (declared size = 0, identical real payload): succeeds and returns the full 4,194,304-byte buffer with zero restriction.

Verified reproducible across 3 independent runs.

Impact

Any application that calls adm-zip's read/extract methods on an untrusted ZIP file (upload handlers, CI artifact extraction, email attachment scanning, etc.) can be made to allocate an amount of memory bounded only by zlib's own internal default rather than any limit the application or adm-zip intends -- a small (tens-of-MB) upload can trigger multi-GB memory consumption, risking process crash/OOM.

Suggested Fix

Apply maxOutputLength unconditionally (e.g. defaulting to a sane absolute ceiling, or always passing the declared size regardless of whether it's 0), and/or add an independent compression-ratio check that doesn't rely solely on the attacker-supplied size field.

Upload your SBOM

Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.

Risk Scores
Base Score
7.5

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
6.9

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.68%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard