Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-r7x5-4969-99p7
Summary
GetSlicers guards only if ws.ExtLst == nil { return } (slicer.go:816-818) and then immediately dereferences ws.Drawing.RID with no nil check on ws.Drawing itself. Drawing and ExtLst are two independently optional child elements of <worksheet> in xl/worksheets/sheetN.xml, populated separately by encoding/xml depending on whether each tag is present. I executed a PoC: took a plain NewFile() workbook (no drawing, no slicer), saved it, then injected a bare <extLst></extLst> immediately before </worksheet> in xl/worksheets/sheet1.xml (no other change, no drawing element present) and called GetSlicers. Result: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference, confirmed at the ws.Drawing.RID line via stack trace.
Reachability / who can trigger this
Unauthenticated: any application that opens an untrusted .xlsx and calls the public File.GetSlicers(sheet) API. The trigger is a single empty XML tag with no valid slicer or drawing content required at all, making it an even smaller/simpler payload than candidate 1.
Proof of Concept / Reproduction
Method:
- Reused the existing clone at C:\Users\vatsa\AppData\Local\Temp\claude\D--\59901fa2-b549-40e1-a433-30c8a3d01718\scratchpad\CVE-Hunt-10k\repos\qax-os__excelize (origin=https://github.com/qax-os/excelize.git, branch master up to date, commit e81f05008b33232151a58f06474fad5f70c4d060 dated 2026-09-27,
git describe=v2.11.0-42-ge81f050, i.e. 42 commits past the v2.11.0 tag). 2) Manually re-read the cited source myself (not trusting the claim): slicer.go:805-820 (GetSlicers) and xmlWorksheet.go:21-72 (xlsxWorksheet struct + xlsxDrawing struct) -- confirmed verbatim, matches claim exactly. 3) Confirmed local toolchain: go version go1.27.0 windows/amd64 (/c/Program Files/Go/bin/go). 4) Built the whole package withgo build ./...from the repo root -- succeeded with zero errors, proving the current checkout compiles cleanly. 5) Ran the pre-existing PoC test file already present in this checkout (slicer_extlst_poc_test.go, TestGetSlicersNilDrawingPanic) viago test -run TestGetSlicersNilDrawingPanic -v .: it builds a benign excelize.NewFile() workbook, saves it, reopens it, loads the raw zip entry xl/worksheets/sheet1.xml, string-replaces</worksheet>with<extLst></extLst></worksheet>(adds nothing else, no <drawing> anywhere), rebuilds the zip byte-for-byte otherwise unchanged (rezipReplacing helper, plain archive/zip re-encode), reopens the crafted file with excelize.OpenReader, and calls the public GetSlicers("Sheet1") API inside a recover(). 6) For a fully independent, non-test-harness reproduction, I additionally wrote and built my own separate standalone Go module+program from scratch (excelize-nilptr-repro/{go.mod,main.go} in my scratchpad dir) that imports the real, unmodified excelize package as an external library dependency via areplace github.com/xuri/excelize/v2 => ../CVE-Hunt-10k/repos/qax-os__excelizedirective (no copy-pasted/reimplemented function -- the actual library code, used through its real public API from a separate consumer program, simulating "any application that opens an untrusted .xlsx"). This program performs the identical craft-and-open sequence but calls GetSlicers with NO recover() at all. Built withgo build -o repro.exe .(succeeded) and ran./repro.exedirectly, observing an unhandled process crash.
Evidence:
SOURCE VERIFICATION (current HEAD, read directly): slicer.go:816-820 is exactly as claimed -- if ws.ExtLst == nil { return slicers, err } followed immediately by target := f.getSheetRelationshipsTargetByID(sheet, ws.Drawing.RID) with no nil check on ws.Drawing. xmlWorksheet.go:54 Drawing *xlsxDrawing xml:"drawing" and xmlWorksheet.go:64 `ExtLst *xlsxExtLst `xml:"extLst" are both independently-optional pointer fields on xlsxWorksheet, populated only when their respective XML tag is present in the worksheet part -- confirming Drawing and ExtLst are unrelated/independent. getSheetRelationshipsTargetByID(sheet, rID string) string (sheet.go:721) takes a plain string, so ws.Drawing.RID is evaluated (dereferencing the nil pointer) at the call site itself.
RUN 1 -- existing repo test, go test -run TestGetSlicersNilDrawingPanic -v .:
=== RUN TestGetSlicersNilDrawingPanic
slicer_extlst_poc_test.go:38: original sheet1.xml: ...<sheetData>...</sheetData></worksheet> (no drawing, no extLst)
slicer_extlst_poc_test.go:48: tampered sheet1.xml: ...</sheetData><extLst></extLst></worksheet>
slicer_extlst_poc_test.go:59: CONFIRMED: GetSlicers panicked on nil ws.Drawing dereference: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
--- PASS: TestGetSlicersNilDrawingPanic (0.01s)
PASS
ok github.com/xuri/excelize/v2 0.100s
RUN 2 -- my own independent standalone consumer program (real unmodified library via go.mod replace, NO recover installed), ./repro.exe:
[] Saved benign workbook: 6052 bytes
[] Original sheet1.xml: ...<sheetData>...</sheetData></worksheet>
[] Tampered sheet1.xml (attacker payload -- bare empty <extLst>, still no <drawing>): ...<extLst></extLst></worksheet>
[] Crafted malicious .xlsx: 6059 bytes
[*] Crafted workbook accepted by OpenReader. Calling the public GetSlicers("Sheet1") API now, no recover() installed...
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal 0xc0000005 code=0x0 addr=0x20 pc=0x7ff7fc8456b8]
goroutine 1 [running]: github.com/xuri/excelize/v2.(*File).GetSlicers(0x27fa8874908, {0x7ff7fc8a5e8a, 0x6}) C:/.../qax-os__excelize/slicer.go:820 +0x98 main.main() C:/.../excelize-nilptr-repro/main.go:122 +0x67f EXIT CODE: 2
The stack trace pinpoints slicer.go:820 exactly (the ws.Drawing.RID dereference), from an ordinary external caller with no recover(), on a workbook whose only "malicious" content is one empty <extLst></extLst> tag and zero drawing/slicer content -- confirming the claim end-to-end: nil-pointer dereference, unrecovered panic, DoS, matching CWE-476.
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard