Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-r6c9-g6q5-qrf9
No affected components available
Summary
The per-CPU message-buffer fallback path uses a 256-byte backup buffer but preserves the original payload size, which can be up to 8KB. If a CPU mismatch occurs, OBI can read beyond the fallback buffer and leak adjacent memory into telemetry.
Details
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation/blob/032473449b53d9f02ec4619d4f5b84e6a81db362/bpf/common/http_buf_size.h#L4-L7
k_kprobes_http2_buf_size is defined as 256 bytes, the size of the fallback buffer.
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation/blob/032473449b53d9f02ec4619d4f5b84e6a81db362/bpf/common/msg_buffer.h#L12-L36
Introduces 8KB per-CPU buffer and 256-byte fallback_buf in msg_buffer_t, creating a size mismatch for fallback use.
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation/blob/032473449b53d9f02ec4619d4f5b84e6a81db362/bpf/generictracer/k_tracer.c#L370-L394
On CPU mismatch, fallback_buf is used but size is still set to m_buf->real_size (up to 8KB) and passed downstream.
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation/blob/032473449b53d9f02ec4619d4f5b84e6a81db362/bpf/generictracer/protocol_http.h#L412-L441
bytes_len (from m_buf->real_size) is used to read payload data from u_buf; if u_buf is the 256B fallback, this can over-read and leak memory into telemetry.
https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-ebpf-instrumentation/blob/032473449b53d9f02ec4619d4f5b84e6a81db362/bpf/tpinjector/tpinjector.c#L192-L206
real_size is set up to 8192 bytes and stored with cpu_id; fallback_buf only contains 256 bytes.
PoC
Local testing with an AddressSanitizer user-space PoC reproduced the same class of size-mismatch over-read as the vulnerable fallback-buffer path. That result is sufficient to ground the advisory in a fresh local reproduction even though the exact end-to-end eBPF path still depends on host BPF capabilities.
To reproduce the validated behavior locally:
- create a struct that models
fallback_buf[256]andreal_size - populate only the 256-byte fallback buffer
- simulate the CPU mismatch path by using the fallback buffer as the source pointer while preserving a much larger
real_size - perform a read of
real_sizebytes from that 256-byte backing store under ASan
An equivalent reproducer is:
// save as /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob.c
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
struct msg_buffer {
unsigned char fallback_buf[256];
uint16_t pos;
uint16_t real_size;
uint32_t cpu_id;
};
int main(void) {
struct msg_buffer m = {0};
unsigned char sink[8192];
memset(m.fallback_buf, 'A', sizeof(m.fallback_buf));
m.real_size = 4096;
memcpy(sink, m.fallback_buf, m.real_size);
printf("copied %u bytes from a 256-byte fallback buffer\n", m.real_size);
return 0;
}
Compile and run with ASan:
cc -fsanitize=address -O1 -g -o /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob.c
ASAN_OPTIONS=abort_on_error=1 /tmp/poc_msgbuf_oob
Expected result:
AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow or stack-buffer-overflow
That user-space PoC matches the size-mismatch condition in the vulnerable code path, even though the exact end-to-end eBPF runtime path still requires host BPF attach/load capability.
Impact
This is a confidentiality issue in the HTTP tracing path. The vulnerable read occurs in OBI's local fallback-buffer handling when context propagation is enabled, the tpinjector sock_msg path is active, HTTP large-buffer capture is configured with a non-zero size, and a CPU mismatch occurs between producer and consumer contexts. Under those conditions, OBI can over-read from the fallback buffer and export unrelated memory through telemetry.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard