Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-qm95-pgcg-qqfq

CriticalCVSS 9.8 / 10
Published Oct 26, 2022·Last modified Nov 8, 2023
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Due to improper type validation in the socket.io-parser library (which is used by the socket.io and socket.io-client packages to encode and decode Socket.IO packets), it is possible to overwrite the _placeholder object which allows an attacker to place references to functions at arbitrary places in the resulting query object.

Example:

const decoder = new Decoder();

decoder.on("decoded", (packet) => {
 console.log(packet.data); // prints [ 'hello', [Function: splice] ]
})

decoder.add('51-["hello",{"_placeholder":true,"num":"splice"}]');
decoder.add(Buffer.from("world"));

This bubbles up in the socket.io package:

io.on("connection", (socket) => {
 socket.on("hello", (val) => {
 // here, "val" could be a function instead of a buffer
 });
});

:warning: IMPORTANT NOTE :warning:

You need to make sure that the payload that you received from the client is actually a Buffer object:

io.on("connection", (socket) => {
 socket.on("hello", (val) => {
 if (!Buffer.isBuffer(val)) {
 socket.disconnect();
 return;
 }
 // ...
 });
});

If that's already the case, then you are not impacted by this issue, and there is no way an attacker could make your server crash (or escalate privileges, ...).

Example of values that could be sent by a malicious user:

  • a number that is out of bounds

Sample packet: 451-["hello",{"_placeholder":true,"num":10}]

io.on("connection", (socket) => {
 socket.on("hello", (val) => {
 // val is `undefined`
 });
});
  • a value that is not a number, like undefined

Sample packet: 451-["hello",{"_placeholder":true,"num":undefined}]

io.on("connection", (socket) => {
 socket.on("hello", (val) => {
 // val is `undefined`
 });
});
  • a string that is part of the prototype of Array, like "push"

Sample packet: 451-["hello",{"_placeholder":true,"num":"push"}]

io.on("connection", (socket) => {
 socket.on("hello", (val) => {
 // val is a reference to the "push" function
 });
});
  • a string that is part of the prototype of Object, like "hasOwnProperty"

Sample packet: 451-["hello",{"_placeholder":true,"num":"hasOwnProperty"}]

io.on("connection", (socket) => {
 socket.on("hello", (val) => {
 // val is a reference to the "hasOwnProperty" function
 });
});

This should be fixed by:

  • https://github.com/socketio/socket.io-parser/commit/b5d0cb7dc56a0601a09b056beaeeb0e43b160050, included in socket.io-parser@4.2.1
  • https://github.com/socketio/socket.io-parser/commit/b559f050ee02bd90bd853b9823f8de7fa94a80d4, included in socket.io-parser@4.0.5
  • https://github.com/socketio/socket.io-parser/commit/04d23cecafe1b859fb03e0cbf6ba3b74dff56d14, included in socket.io-parser@3.4.2
  • https://github.com/socketio/socket.io-parser/commit/fb21e422fc193b34347395a33e0f625bebc09983, included in socket.io-parser@3.3.3

Dependency analysis for the socket.io package

| socket.io version | socket.io-parser version | Covered? | |---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------| | 4.5.2...latest | ~4.2.0 (ref) | Yes :heavy_check_mark: | | 4.1.3...4.5.1 | ~4.0.4 (ref) | Yes :heavy_check_mark: | | 3.0.5...4.1.2 | ~4.0.3 (ref) | Yes :heavy_check_mark: | | 3.0.0...3.0.4 | ~4.0.1 (ref) | Yes :heavy_check_mark: | | 2.3.0...2.5.0 | ~3.4.0 (ref) | Yes :heavy_check_mark: |

Dependency analysis for the socket.io-client package

| socket.io-client version | socket.io-parser version | Covered? | |----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------| | 4.5.0...latest | ~4.2.0 (ref) | Yes :heavy_check_mark: | | 4.3.0...4.4.1 | ~4.1.1 (ref) | No, but the impact is very limited | | 3.1.0...4.2.0 | ~4.0.4 (ref) | Yes :heavy_check_mark: | | 3.0.5 | ~4.0.3 (ref) | Yes :heavy_check_mark: | | 3.0.0...3.0.4 | ~4.0.1 (ref) | Yes :heavy_check_mark: | | 2.2.0...2.5.0 | ~3.3.0 (ref) | Yes :heavy_check_mark: |

Risk Scores
Base Score
9.8

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
9.0

Active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. Immediate patching or mitigation is required.

EPSS
1.12%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard