Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-qhmf-xw27-6rqr

MediumCVSS 6.3 / 10
Published Jun 25, 2026·Last modified Jun 25, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

MessagePack-CSharp's typeless deserialization includes MessagePackSerializerOptions.ThrowIfDeserializingTypeIsDisallowed(Type) as a safety check for dangerous types. The default implementation checks the outer type name, but it does not recursively inspect array element types or generic type arguments.

As a result, a type that would be blocked directly can be wrapped inside an array or constructed generic type and pass the outer type check. The formatter machinery can then materialize formatters for the inner blocked type.

Impact

Applications are affected when they deserialize untrusted payloads using typeless serialization features such as MessagePackSerializer.Typeless, TypelessObjectResolver, or related typeless resolver options.

Typeless deserialization is already a high-risk feature for untrusted data, but the presence of a disallowed-type hook creates an expectation that blocked types remain blocked. This issue weakens that mitigation because the check is not applied structurally to nested type components. An attacker who can supply typeless ext-100 payloads may bypass exact outer-type blocklist checks by naming wrapper types such as arrays or generic containers.

The consequence depends on which type is reached and what the application allows typeless deserialization to instantiate. The original findings describe bypasses involving blocked or user-blocklisted gadget types.

Affected components

  • Package: MessagePack
  • Feature: typeless deserialization
  • APIs: MessagePackSerializerOptions.ThrowIfDeserializingTypeIsDisallowed, TypelessFormatter
  • Finding IDs: MESSAGEPACKCSHARP-030, duplicate/open variant MESSAGEPACKCSHARP-OPEN-007

Patches

Fixes are available via versions 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.

Upgrade guidance:

  1. Upgrade MessagePack to the patched version for your release line.
  2. Upgrade companion MessagePack packages in the same dependency graph to the coordinated patched versions.

The fix should apply type-disallow checks recursively to array element types, pointer/byref element types where applicable, nullable underlying types, and constructed generic type arguments. Formatter paths that materialize types supplied by the wire should not instantiate inner types that fail the configured policy.

Workarounds

Patching is recommended.

Avoid typeless deserialization for untrusted data. If typeless support is unavoidable, configure an explicit allowlist that rejects any type not approved by the application and ensure the allowlist recursively validates array elements and generic arguments. Do not rely on exact outer-type blocklists as a complete security boundary.

Resources

  • MESSAGEPACKCSHARP-030: typeless disallowed-type check is not recursive
  • MESSAGEPACKCSHARP-OPEN-007: duplicate/open finding for typeless blocklist gaps
  • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data
  • CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code

CVE split rationale

This vulnerability is independently fixable in typeless type-policy enforcement. It is separate from MVC default options, collection allocation, LZ4 decoding, and recursion-depth issues.

Risk Scores
Base Score
6.3

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
1.7

Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.

EPSS
0.25%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard