Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-q93q-v844-jrqp
No affected components available
kyverno’s apiCall servicecall helper implicitly injects Authorization: Bearer ... using the kyverno controller serviceaccount token when a policy does not explicitly set an Authorization header. because context.apiCall.service.url is policy-controlled, this can send the kyverno serviceaccount token to an attacker-controlled endpoint (confused deputy).
namespaced policies are blocked from servicecall usage by the namespaced urlPath gate in pkg/engine/apicall/apiCall.go, so this report is scoped to ClusterPolicy and global context usage.
attacker model
the attacker can create or update a ClusterPolicy (or create a GlobalContextEntry) which uses context.apiCall.service.url and can choose the request URL and headers. a cross-boundary framing for real deployments is gitops: if the policy repo/controller is compromised, the ClusterPolicy/global context entry becomes untrusted input to kyverno.
relevant links
- repository: https://github.com/kyverno/kyverno
- commit: 17aeb52337fd66adb0c8126213ba076612a287a7
- callsite (token injection): https://github.com/kyverno/kyverno/blob/17aeb52337fd66adb0c8126213ba076612a287a7/pkg/engine/apicall/executor.go#L150-L173
- namespaced policy gate (servicecall blocked): https://github.com/kyverno/kyverno/blob/17aeb52337fd66adb0c8126213ba076612a287a7/pkg/engine/apicall/apiCall.go#L67-L83
root cause
in (*executor).addHTTPHeaders, kyverno reads the serviceaccount token from /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token and injects it when the outgoing request has no Authorization header:
if req.Header.Get("Authorization") == "" {
token := a.getToken()
if token != "" {
req.Header.Add("Authorization", "Bearer "+token)
}
}
proof of concept
the attached poc.zip is a reproducible cluster PoC. it uses an in-cluster HTTP receiver which logs the Authorization header it receives. the PoC does not print token bytes; it only checks that the received header is non-empty and not equal to the negative control.
run (one command):
unzip poc.zip -d poc
cd poc
make test
canonical (expected: implicit token injection):
unzip poc.zip -d poc
cd poc
make canonical
expected output includes:
[CALLSITE_HIT]: executor.addHTTPHeaders Authorization=="" -> read_serviceaccount_token=true
[PROOF_MARKER]: authorization_header_injected=true token_nonempty=true
control (expected: explicit Authorization header disables auto-injection):
unzip poc.zip -d poc
cd poc
make control
expected output includes:
[CALLSITE_HIT]: executor.addHTTPHeaders Authorization!="" -> autoinject_skipped=true
[NC_MARKER]: authorization_header_injected=false
optional: the canonical run may also print an [RBAC]: ... line using kubectl auth can-i with the exfiltrated token, to show concrete privileges without exposing the token.
impact
token exfiltration: the kyverno controller serviceaccount token is sent to a policy-controlled endpoint. impact depends on the rbac bound to that serviceaccount in the target deployment.
recommended fix
do not auto-inject the kyverno serviceaccount token into policy-controlled servicecall requests. require explicit Authorization configuration, or enforce a strict allowlist of destinations where credentials may be attached and document the behavior.
workarounds
- avoid using servicecall to arbitrary urls in policies.
- set an explicit Authorization header in servicecall policies to prevent implicit token injection.
oleh
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard