Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-q4w7-56hr-83rm
No affected components available
Summary
The GetSettings API handler (api/settings/settings.go:24-65) serializes all settings structs to JSON and returns them to authenticated users. Many sensitive fields are tagged with protected:"true" - however, this tag is only enforced during writes (via ProtectedFill in SaveSettings) and is completely ignored during reads. This exposes 40+ protected fields including JwtSecret (enabling auth token forgery), NodeSecret (enabling cluster node impersonation), OIDC ClientSecret (enabling OAuth account takeover), and the IP whitelist configuration.
Details
Vulnerable Code
api/settings/settings.go:49-64 - GetSettings serializes all fields
c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{
"app": cSettings.AppSettings,
"server": cSettings.ServerSettings,
"database": settings.DatabaseSettings,
"auth": settings.AuthSettings,
"casdoor": settings.CasdoorSettings,
"oidc": settings.OIDCSettings,
"cert": settings.CertSettings,
"http": settings.HTTPSettings,
"logrotate": settings.LogrotateSettings,
"nginx": settings.NginxSettings,
"node": settings.NodeSettings,
"openai": settings.OpenAISettings,
"terminal": settings.TerminalSettings,
"webauthn": settings.WebAuthnSettings,
})
Go's json.Marshal serializes all exported fields with json: tags. The protected:"true" struct tag is a custom tag - it has no effect on JSON serialization.
Protection is Write-Only
api/settings/settings.go:126-135 - ProtectedFill only used during saves
cSettings.ProtectedFill(cSettings.AppSettings, &json.App)
cSettings.ProtectedFill(cSettings.ServerSettings, &json.Server)
cSettings.ProtectedFill(settings.AuthSettings, &json.Auth)
// ... etc
ProtectedFill prevents overwriting protected fields during SaveSettings, but GetSettings has no corresponding filter. The protection is asymmetric - secrets can be read but not overwritten.
Exposed Protected Fields
settings/node.go:
Secret(protected) - used for cluster node authenticationSkipInstallation(protected),Demo(protected)
settings/oidc.go (all protected):
ClientId,ClientSecret,Endpoint,RedirectUri,Scopes,Identifier
settings/casdoor.go (all protected):
Endpoint,ExternalUrl,ClientId,ClientSecret,CertificatePath,Organization,Application,RedirectUri
settings/auth.go:
IPWhiteList(protected) - exposes security configuration
Attack Scenario
- Low-privilege authenticated user calls
GET /api/settings - Response includes
NodeSecret- attacker can impersonate cluster nodes - Response includes OIDC
ClientSecret- attacker can perform OAuth flows as the application - Response includes
IPWhiteList- attacker learns network security configuration - If
JwtSecretis in app settings (via cosy framework), attacker can forge authentication tokens for any user
PoC
1. GetSettings serializes all fields without filtering protected:"true" tags. From api/settings/settings.go:49-64:
c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{
"app": cSettings.AppSettings,
"server": cSettings.ServerSettings,
"database": settings.DatabaseSettings,
"auth": settings.AuthSettings,
"casdoor": settings.CasdoorSettings,
"oidc": settings.OIDCSettings,
"cert": settings.CertSettings,
"http": settings.HTTPSettings,
"logrotate": settings.LogrotateSettings,
"nginx": settings.NginxSettings,
"node": settings.NodeSettings,
"openai": settings.OpenAISettings,
"terminal": settings.TerminalSettings,
"webauthn": settings.WebAuthnSettings,
})
Go's json.Marshal serializes all exported fields. The custom protected:"true" tag has no effect on serialization.
2. Protected secrets are defined across settings/*.go. High-impact examples:
// settings/server_v1.go:19
JwtSecret string `json:"jwt_secret" protected:"true"`
// settings/node.go:5
Secret string `json:"secret" protected:"true"`
// settings/oidc.go
ClientSecret string `json:"client_secret" protected:"true"`
// settings/auth.go
IPWhiteList []string `json:"ip_white_list" protected:"true"`
3. ProtectedFill is write-only. It appears 10 times in SaveSettings (lines 126-135) but 0 times in GetSettings:
// api/settings/settings.go:126-135 - Only used during writes
cSettings.ProtectedFill(cSettings.AppSettings, &json.App)
cSettings.ProtectedFill(cSettings.ServerSettings, &json.Server)
cSettings.ProtectedFill(settings.AuthSettings, &json.Auth)
// ... 7 more calls
4. Exploit request. Any authenticated user can retrieve all secrets:
GET /api/settings HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Bearer <any-valid-jwt>
Response includes (among 45 protected fields):
{
"app": {"jwt_secret": "<the-actual-jwt-signing-key>", ...},
"node": {"secret": "<node-authentication-secret>", ...},
"oidc": {"client_secret": "<oidc-client-secret>", ...},
"casdoor": {"client_secret": "<casdoor-client-secret>", ...},
"auth": {"ip_white_list": ["10.0.0.1", ...], ...},
"nginx": {"reload_cmd": "nginx -s reload", "restart_cmd": "...", ...}
}
Impact
- Authentication bypass via JwtSecret: An attacker who obtains the
JwtSecretcan forge valid JWT tokens for any user, including admin accounts. This provides permanent, independent access that survives password changes and session revocations. - Cluster compromise via NodeSecret: The
NodeSecretis used for inter-node authentication in nginx-ui clusters. An attacker can impersonate any cluster node, push malicious configurations to all nodes, and intercept cluster synchronization traffic. - Third-party OAuth takeover: Leaked OIDC
ClientSecretand CasdoorClientSecretallow the attacker to perform OAuth flows as the nginx-ui application, potentially gaining access to user accounts on the identity provider. - Security configuration disclosure: The
IPWhiteList,ReloadCmd,RestartCmd,ConfigDir,SbinPath, and other protected fields reveal the security posture and infrastructure layout, enabling more targeted attacks. - Low barrier to exploitation: Any authenticated user (not just admins) can access
GET /api/settings. In multi-user deployments, a low-privilege operator can escalate to full admin access.
Remediation
Filter out protected:"true" fields before serialization.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard