Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-pq96-jpmf-w254
Vulnerability Details
File: ui/src/utils/meta/Meta.js — actually ui/src/plugins/meta/Meta.js (lines 149-176: getAttr() and getHead())
Sink: injectServerMeta() (same file) → ctx.headTags += getHead(data), interpolated verbatim into the raw HTTP response <head> by the production SSR template (app-vite/templates/entry/ssr-prod-webserver.js + app-vite/lib/plugins/vite.html.js)
Entry point: the public useMeta() composable (ui/src/composables/use-meta/use-meta.js) — the single documented way apps set page title/meta/link/script tags
Root Cause
getHead() is Quasar's SSR-only serializer that turns the meta/link/script/title data collected from every useMeta() call into a literal HTML string, using plain template-literal interpolation with zero HTML-entity escaping and zero attribute-quote escaping:
function getAttr(seed) {
return att => {
const val = seed[att]
return att + (val !== true && val !== void 0 ? `="${val}"` : '')
}
}
function getHead(meta) {
let output = ''
if (meta.title) {
output += `<title>${meta.title}</title>`
}
...
}
Contrast this with the client-side equivalent, apply() (same file, used only in the browser post-hydration), which builds the same tags via document.createElement(...) + tag.setAttribute(att, val) — the browser DOM API automatically escapes attribute values, so the client-side path is not vulnerable. getHead() is a separate, parallel implementation for the SSR case that never received the same protection.
Any string containing </title>, ", or > in a title, meta.*.content, link.*.href, or any other attribute value passed to useMeta() breaks out of its intended HTML context and injects arbitrary markup — including a live <script> tag — directly into the raw HTML response sent to every visitor.
Attack Scenario
- A Quasar SSR application renders dynamic page metadata via the standard, documented
useMeta()pattern — e.g.useMeta(() => ({ title: post.title, meta: { description: { name: 'description', content: post.excerpt } } }))for a blog/CMS/product page. - An attacker who can influence that underlying text (submit a blog post/comment, set their own profile display name, control a field in an integrated CMS/API) sets it to
My Post</title><script>alert(document.cookie)</script>. - On every SSR render of that page — for every visitor —
getHead()emits this payload unescaped directly into the<head>of the raw HTML response. - The victim's browser parses the HTML top-to-bottom; the injected
<script>executes immediately, before hydration, with full access todocument.cookieand the DOM.
Impact
- Type: CWE-79 Cross-Site Scripting
- Auth required: No (attacker only needs to influence any text that reaches
useMeta()— an extremely common pattern, e.g. blog titles, product names, user display names) - Consequence: Full client-side script execution in the victim site's origin — session/cookie theft, credential phishing overlays, account takeover, defacement. Unlike a typical XSS bug requiring a specific unusual injection point, this affects the single most common
useMeta()use case (rendering any dynamic title/description), so it can be triggered even by ordinary content containing&,<, or"without malicious intent, in addition to being trivially exploitable deliberately.
Vulnerable Code (ui/src/plugins/meta/Meta.js lines 149-176)
function getAttr(seed) {
return att => {
const val = seed[att]
return att + (val !== true && val !== void 0 ? `="${val}"` : '')
}
}
function getHead(meta) {
let output = ''
if (meta.title) {
output += `<title>${meta.title}</title>`
}
;['meta', 'link', 'script'].forEach(type => {
const metaType = meta[type]
for (const att in metaType) {
const attrs = Object.keys(metaType[att])
.filter(item => item !== 'innerHTML')
.map(getAttr(metaType[att]))
output += `<${type} ${attrs.join(' ')} data-qmeta="${att}">`
if (type === 'script') {
output += (metaType[att].innerHTML || '') + '</script>'
}
}
})
return output
}
Recommended Fix
function escapeHtml(val) {
return String(val)
.replaceAll('&', '&')
.replaceAll('<', '<')
.replaceAll('>', '>')
.replaceAll('"', '"')
}
function getAttr(seed) {
return att => {
const val = seed[att]
return att + (val !== true && val !== void 0 ? `="${escapeHtml(val)}"` : '')
}
}
function getHead(meta) {
let output = ''
if (meta.title) {
output += `<title>${escapeHtml(meta.title)}</title>`
}
// ... rest unchanged, script innerHTML intentionally left raw (JSON-LD use case)
}
Verification
Confirmed end-to-end on v2.21.1 via a local Node.js HTTP lab harness that imports the real, unmodified Meta.js source and reproduces the exact useMeta() → injectServerMeta() call sequence a real SSR app performs, reached via actual curl requests (not just isolated function calls):
POST /submitwith{"title":"My Post</title><script>alert(document.cookie)</script>","description":"\"><script>alert(document.domain)</script>"}GET /render/1returned a raw HTTP response whose<head>contained:<title>My Post</title><script>alert(document.cookie)</script></title><meta name="description" content=""><script>alert(document.domain)</script>" data-qmeta="description">- Verified via
grep: 0 occurrences of<(nothing was escaped), 1 occurrence of a literal, unescaped<script>alert(...)</script>tag in the actual HTTP response body.
A fix branch (fix/xss-meta-tag-escaping) is ready with the minimal patch above (adds an escapeHtml() helper used in getAttr()/getHead()); re-running the same PoC against the patched code shows the payload fully HTML-entity-encoded (<script>...) with no live <script> tag, while normal titles containing & still render correctly (&).
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data.
Active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. Immediate patching or mitigation is required.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard