Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-p7gw-2pcp-5pf8
Summary
When a marketplace order is settled (MarketBuy / BuyItNow, and auction Claim), the buyer's
payment is split three ways — referral, royalties, and the seller (market-order owner)
remainder:
marketOwnerAmount = CurrentBid − referralAmount − royaltiesAmount
Referral and royalties are paid out unconditionally, but the seller remainder is only paid
when positive (computeMarketOwnerAmount returns Ok and pays nothing when the amount is
<= 0). When referral% + royalty% exceeds 100% of the bid, marketOwnerAmount goes negative
and is silently skipped — so the marketplace pays out more KLV / sale currency than the buyer
paid in, minting the difference out of thin air.
The combined ceiling royalty% + referral% <= 100% is checked once, at listing time (Sell).
But the two percentages are sourced asymmetrically at settlement:
- referral % is snapshotted into the order at
Sell(MarketOrderData.ReferralPercentage); - royalty % is never snapshotted — it is read live from the asset at buy time
(
asset.Royalties.MarketPercentage).
So the listing-time invariant is a time-of-check/time-of-use guarantee only. After a valid
listing, the asset owner raises the royalty MarketPercentage via AssetTrigger → UpdateRoyalties;
at the next buy the live royalty plus the snapshotted referral exceed 100%, and the settlement mints
the overflow. The minted funds land in attacker-controlled referral / royalty addresses.
This was actively exploited on mainnet (see Evidence), minting tens of millions of KLV before the emergency guard was deployed.
Affected component
- Repository:
klever-io/klever-go(node). - Settlement / mint site:
core/kapp/market/market.go—executeBuyMarket(L575+),computeReferralAmount(L361+),computeRoyaltiesAmount(L490+),computeRoyaltiesFixedDeposit(L443+),computeMarketOwnerAmount(L540+). - TOCTOU sources:
Sellcombined check (market.go:908), order snapshot of referral but not royalty (market.go:997), live royalty mutation viacore/kapp/kda/trigger.go—handleUpdateRoyaltiesNFTandSFT(L613+, setsasset.Royalties.MarketPercentageat L670). - Reachable from both
Buy(BuyItNow,market.go:204+) and auctionClaim(market.go:705,market.go:731). - Pre-fix: not gated by any fork flag — exploitable on mainnet. The fix is gated behind the new
FixMarketBuyOverflowactivation-epoch flag.
Root cause
1. Settlement pays referral + royalty unconditionally, seller remainder only if positive
core/kapp/market/market.go — executeBuyMarket (L575+):
referralAmount, _ := tools.ComputePercentageI64(marketOrder.CurrentBid,
int64(marketOrder.ReferralPercentage), ...) // L583: SNAPSHOT referral %
royaltiesAmount, _ := tools.ComputePercentageI64(marketOrder.CurrentBid,
int64(asset.Royalties.MarketPercentage), ...) // L587: LIVE royalty %
marketOwnerAmount := marketOrder.CurrentBid - referralAmount - royaltiesAmount // L591: can go negative
// ---- FIX (FixMarketBuyOverflow), added by the patch ----
if m.forkController.FixMarketBuyOverflow() && marketOwnerAmount < 0 { // L593-596
ctx.Receipts().AddError(ctx.ContractID(), common.ErrFieldInvalidRoyalties, common.ErrInvalidValue.Error())
return transaction.Transaction_AmountInvalid, common.ErrInvalidValue
}
m.computeReferralAmount(ctx, marketOrder, referralAmount, currencyID) // pays referral in full
m.computeRoyaltiesFixedDeposit(ctx, marketOrder, asset) // pays fixed royalty (KLV)
m.computeRoyaltiesAmount(ctx, marketOrder, asset, currencyID, royaltiesAmount) // pays % royalty in full
m.computeMarketOwnerAmount(ctx, marketOrder, currencyID, marketOwnerAmount) // <-- skips when <= 0
computeMarketOwnerAmount (L540-542) — the silent skip:
func (m *marketKapp) computeMarketOwnerAmount(... marketOwnerAmount int64) (... , error) {
if marketOwnerAmount <= 0 {
return transaction.Transaction_Ok, nil // negative seller share dropped, NO error
}
// ... AddToBalance(marketOwnerAmount) ...
}
Meanwhile computeReferralAmount (L376) and computeRoyaltiesAmount (L515) each AddToBalance(...)
the full computed amount with no matching debit from the buyer beyond the single
bidderAcc.SubFromBalance(amount) taken in Buy (market.go:301).
Conservation breaks: buyer is debited bid once; recipients are credited
referralAmount + royaltiesAmount. When that sum > bid, the surplus
(referralAmount + royaltiesAmount − bid) is minted.
2. The combined ≤100% invariant is enforced only at listing time
Sell (market.go:908) correctly rejects a listing whose combined cut exceeds 100%:
if asset.Royalties.MarketPercentage + marketplace.ReferralPercentage > core.HundredPercent {
return transaction.Transaction_ParameterInvalid, common.ErrInvalidValue
}
…and snapshots referral into the order, but not royalty (market.go:997-998):
marketOrder := &kapps.MarketOrderData{
// ...
ReferralPercentage: marketplace.ReferralPercentage, // snapshotted
RoyaltiesFixedDeposit: asset.Royalties.MarketFixed, // snapshotted
// NOTE: asset.Royalties.MarketPercentage is NOT snapshotted -> read live at buy
}
MarketOrderData has no field for the royalty percentage (kapps/market.pb.go), so settlement
always re-reads it live from the (mutable) asset.
3. Royalty % is mutable after listing
core/kapp/kda/trigger.go — handleUpdateRoyaltiesNFTandSFT (L613+) lets the asset owner overwrite
asset.Royalties.MarketPercentage (L670) with only a per-field <= 100% check (CheckValid100Params,
L651) — it has no knowledge of any outstanding marketplace listing's snapshotted referral. So the
owner can list at, e.g., referral 100% / royalty 0% (sum 100%, passes Sell), then raise royalty to
100%, making the buy-time sum 200%.
The shipped emergency-guard source documents this exact vector: "The royalty percentage is read live at buy time, so a listing made now can be weaponised later via UpdateRoyalties." (
common/emergencyGuard.go)
Net effect: referralAmount + royaltiesAmount = bid + bid = 2·bid; marketOwnerAmount = −bid
(skipped); bid KLV minted per settlement, paid to attacker-controlled addresses.
Proof of Concept
A. Committed regression test (deterministic, runnable today)
core/kapp/market/market_test.go — TestMarketKApp_ExecuteBuyMarket_RoyaltyReferralInflation.
It builds an order with ReferralPercentage = 100% and an asset with MarketPercentage = 100%
(the attacker is both the referral and the royalty address), then settles a bid of
25,600,000 KLV (25600000000000 base units):
go test ./core/kapp/market/ -run TestMarketKApp_ExecuteBuyMarket_RoyaltyReferralInflation -v
FixDisabled_MintsKLVFromThinAir: settlement returnsOk; the attacker address ends with2·bidcredited while onlybidwas paid in — i.e.bidKLV minted.FixEnabled_RejectsInflation: withFixMarketBuyOverflowon, settlement returnsTransaction_AmountInvalidand the attacker balance stays0— no payout runs.
B. End-to-end on a local node (the real attack path)
A single-node local network is sufficient. The exploit is four transactions from one ordinary funded account; nothing privileged is required.
- Create an NFT collection you own, with
royalties.marketPercentage = 0and a royalties address you control. - Create a marketplace with
referralPercentage = 10000(100%) and a referral address you control (CreateMarketplace). - List one NFT for sale (
Sell) on that marketplace. TheSellcheck passes because0 (royalty) + 10000 (referral) = 10000 = HundredPercent. The order snapshotsReferralPercentage = 10000. - Raise the royalty on the asset to 100% (
AssetTrigger / UpdateRoyalties,marketPercentage = 10000). Allowed: the per-field check passes and the live combined invariant is never re-evaluated against the open listing. - Buy the listing (
MarketBuy) from a second account (or settle the auction viaClaim).referralAmount = bid,royaltiesAmount = bid,marketOwnerAmount = −bid(skipped). Your referral + royalty addresses receive2·bid; the buyer paidbid;bidKLV is minted.
Because the attacker controls buyer, seller, referral and royalty addresses, the only real cost is transaction fees; the cycle is repeatable until supply targets are met.
Evidence
Regression test (local, verbatim)
=== RUN TestMarketKApp_ExecuteBuyMarket_RoyaltyReferralInflation
=== RUN TestMarketKApp_ExecuteBuyMarket_RoyaltyReferralInflation/FixDisabled_MintsKLVFromThinAir
=== RUN TestMarketKApp_ExecuteBuyMarket_RoyaltyReferralInflation/FixEnabled_RejectsInflation
--- PASS: TestMarketKApp_ExecuteBuyMarket_RoyaltyReferralInflation (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestMarketKApp_ExecuteBuyMarket_RoyaltyReferralInflation/FixDisabled_MintsKLVFromThinAir (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestMarketKApp_ExecuteBuyMarket_RoyaltyReferralInflation/FixEnabled_RejectsInflation (0.00s)
PASS
ok github.com/klever-io/klever-go/core/kapp/market 0.279s
FixDisabled asserts the attacker balance equals 2·bid = 51,200,000 KLV for a single settlement
(bid = 25,600,000 KLV), with bid of that minted. FixEnabled asserts rejection and a 0
balance.
Mainnet exploitation (observed)
The bug was exploited in production, and was detected and characterised externally by the community monitoring project KleverPuls / kpulse.tech before the root cause was known internally. Over a ~24h window kpulse isolated a single wallet (opened 2026-06-04, ~204 transactions in ~24h, funded only by a ~242K KLV KuCoin withdrawal, no treasury/foundation funding) that:
- self-issued 3 NFT collections named "InflationPOC" and wash-traded one (
NFLATION-ESGO/1) 29 times through self-created marketplaces — ~$450K of artificial, economically empty NFT volume; - swapped the proceeds KLV → USDC / USDT / WBTC / WETH on KleverSwap and bridged ~$72K of value to Ethereum via wrapped-asset burns over 24h (USDC −12,487 ≈ $12.5K; USDT −26,362 ≈ $26.4K; WBTC −0.31 ≈ $19.6K; WETH −7.55 ≈ $14K);
- surfaced a spurious "1.86B KLV outflow" headline that kpulse correctly identified as a wash-trade receipt-doubling artifact with small real net KLV flow.
That "doubling of marketplace receipts" is precisely the on-chain signature of this bug: each
abusive settlement pays out a referral cut (bid) plus a royalty cut (bid) while the buyer paid
only bid once — the market contract emits ~2× the value it took in, which is the mint. The
attacker's self-issued collection and self-created marketplaces are exactly the self-dealing setup the
regression test reproduces (the test reuses the real on-chain identifiers: collectionID = "NFLATION-ESGO", asset 1, market name "Inflation Market").
kpulse could not determine the cause from on-chain data alone and flagged the activity for confirmation; the Klever core team then traced it to the referral+royalty settlement defect described above and shipped the emergency guard + protocol fix.
Each abusive settlement minted one bid of KLV; the observed bid was 25,600,000 KLV, repeated and
funnelled through a short hop chain before being swapped and bridged. The emergency guard
(common/emergencyGuard.go) blocks the following observed sender public keys (hex):
| Public key (hex) | Address | Role (observed) |
|---|---|---|
| 54ea28e527d4136508be955374afa54a8c25c19a48c674f412f7ce02db0f4e1b | klv12n4z3ef86sfk2z97j4fhfta9f2xztsv6frr8faqj7l8q9kc0fcdsfjfqez | root / minter |
| bb687dbba23e1844fec674a32cb8809f0d3207506c53fc3d637e40dc56708d63 | klv1hd58mwaz8cvyflkxwj3jewyqnuxnyp6sd3flc0tr0eqdc4ns343skngdjq | collector hop (~125M KLV) |
| 77388d3dfe6cd88e8da723254c11abf3d9cccb6fb77b000e5038fc3ff92b964d | klv1wuug6007dnvgard8yvj5cydt70vuejm0kaasqrjs8r7rl7ftjexsglalf6 | direct recipient (25.6M, idle) |
| a196789b026f996867f08317cc6c5a4eb9ad3a59b1be3716420bc8692d4c3048 | klv15xt83xczd7vkselssvtucmz6f6u66wjekxlrw9jzp0yxjt2vxpyq2nawrw | hop-2 recipient (25M) |
The single-bid per-settlement size (25.6M KLV) matches the "direct recipient, 25.6M" entry, and the
~125M at the collector hop is consistent with roughly five abusive settlements.
Impact
- Unbounded inflation of KLV (and of any sale currency used for the listing), repeatable for only transaction fees, by any account that creates its own collection + marketplace.
- The minted KLV is created by direct
AddToBalanceto attacker addresses (no trackedMint), so the asset's booked supply does not change — the inflation is off the books and only detectable by summing balances / auditing receipts (it surfaces on-chain as doubled marketplace receipts). - Realized impact (observed): the attacker minted KLV via ~29 self-dealt settlements, swapped to stable/wrapped assets on KleverSwap, and off-ramped ~$72K to Ethereum via the bridge (USDC, USDT, WBTC, WETH) before the emergency guard halted the activity, alongside ~$450K of artificial NFT wash-trade volume.
- Total loss of economic integrity for all KLV / token holders.
Who can exploit it / prerequisites
- Any account that can pay the one-time collection-create + marketplace-create fees and tx fees. No roles, admin, or allowlist.
- Any client. The settlement is triggered by standard
MarketBuy/Claimcontracts POSTed to the public, unauthenticated/transaction/sendRPC (network/api/transaction/routes.go,SendTX/BroadcastTX). TheoperatorCLI, the SDKs, or a hand-signedcurlall work. - Deterministic; the abusive state is reached with one extra
UpdateRoyaltiesafter a normal listing.
Remediation
Shipped as a layered response (embargoed):
Layer 0 — emergency guard (deployed first, fork-proof) — GHSA-p7gw rc1
common/emergencyGuard.go + data/transaction/emergencyGuard.go: matching transactions are kept
out of blocks this node proposes (core/process/block/preprocess/transactions.go) and refused at
the node API (node.go SendTransaction / SendBulkTransactions). It never changes block
validity, so a partial-fleet rollout cannot fork the chain. It blocks the known attacker senders
(all contract types) plus all MarketBuy, Sell, and CreateMarketplace / ConfigMarketplace
operations while the protocol fix rolls out. Enforcement is by proposer cooperation, not protocol —
coverage equals the share of block producers running the guard.
Layer 1 — protocol fix (consensus, epoch-gated) — GHSA-p7gw rc2
core/kapp/market/market.go:593 rejects the settlement when marketOwnerAmount < 0, before any
payout runs, returning Transaction_AmountInvalid. Gated behind the new FixMarketBuyOverflow
activation-epoch flag (config/enableEpochs.*, core/fork/forks.go, core/interface.go) so
historical blocks reprocess identically. Covered by
TestMarketKApp_ExecuteBuyMarket_RoyaltyReferralInflation.
Recommended hardening (defense in depth)
- Snapshot the royalty % into
MarketOrderDataatSell(as referral already is) and pay from the snapshot, eliminating the TOCTOU entirely; or re-evaluate the combinedreferral% + royalty% <= 100%invariant at settlement. - Treat a negative seller remainder as a hard error everywhere, and only treat exactly
0as a no-op skip (computeMarketOwnerAmount), so a future regression aborts the tx instead of minting. - After splitting a payment pool, assert conservation (
referral + royalties + ownerShare == bid) so any drift aborts the transaction.
Notes
- Triggered by both BuyItNow (
Buy) and auction settlement (Claim). - The same family of "pay full cut, silently drop the negative remainder" minting also exists in the
royalty-split paths and is tracked separately under GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v (split-royalty
uint32overflow). This advisory covers the top-level referral+royalty > bid case; theFixMarketBuyOverflowguard here only checksmarketOwnerAmount, not intra-split over-payments.
Acknowledgments
- KleverPuls / kpulse.tech — community monitoring project that first
detected and characterised the exploitation in the wild. kpulse isolated the attacker wallet and
its "InflationPOC" collections, identified the marketplace wash-trading of
NFLATION-ESGO/1and the KleverSwap → bridge off-ramp (~$72K to Ethereum), and flagged the anomalous doubling of marketplace receipts — the exact on-chain signature of this bug — prompting the incident response that led to this fix. The root cause was then identified and remediated by the Klever core team.
Source
- Vulnerable / fixed code:
core/kapp/market/market.go:540-545,575-596,908,997-998,core/kapp/kda/trigger.go:613-676,core/process/kda/assetHelper.go:101,tools/converters.go:102,core/constants.go:18. - Emergency guard:
common/emergencyGuard.go,data/transaction/emergencyGuard.go,core/process/block/preprocess/transactions.go,node/node.go. - Fork flag:
config/enableEpochs.go,config/node/enableEpochs.yaml,core/fork/forks.go,core/interface.go. - Regression test:
core/kapp/market/market_test.go(TestMarketKApp_ExecuteBuyMarket_RoyaltyReferralInflation).
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard