Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-mx42-j6wv-px98
No affected components available
RustFS contains a missing authorization check in the multipart copy path (UploadPartCopy). A low-privileged user who cannot read objects from a victim bucket can still exfiltrate victim objects by copying them into an attacker-controlled multipart upload and completing the upload.
This breaks tenant isolation in multi-user / multi-tenant deployments.
Impact
Unauthorized cross-bucket / cross-tenant data exfiltration (Confidentiality: High).
An attacker with only minimal permissions on their own bucket (multipart upload + Put/Get on destination objects) can copy and retrieve objects from a victim bucket without having s3:GetObject (or equivalent) permission on the source.
In the attached PoC, the attacker successfully exfiltrates a 5MB private object and proves integrity via matching SHA256 and size.
Threat Model (Realistic)
- Victim tenant/user owns a bucket (e.g.,
victim-bucket-*) and stores private objects (e.g.,private/finance_dump.bin). - Attacker tenant/user has no permissions on the victim bucket:
- cannot
ListObjects,HeadObject,GetObject, orCopyObjectfrom the victim bucket.
- cannot
- Attacker has minimal permissions only on attacker bucket:
CreateMultipartUpload,UploadPart,UploadPartCopy,CompleteMultipartUpload,AbortMultipartUpload,- and
PutObject/GetObjectfor objects in attacker bucket.
- Despite this, attacker can exfiltrate victim objects via multipart copy.
Root Cause Analysis
The access control layer fails open for multipart copy-related operations:
File: rustfs/src/storage/access.rs
abort_multipart_upload()returnsOk(())without authorization (L435–437)complete_multipart_upload()returnsOk(())without authorization (L442–444)upload_part_copy()returnsOk(())without authorization (L1446–1448)
In contrast, copy_object() correctly enforces authorization:
- source
GetObjectauthorization (L469) - destination
PutObjectauthorization (L478)
The multipart copy implementation reads the source object directly:
File: rustfs/src/app/multipart_usecase.rs
store.get_object_reader(&src_bucket, &src_key, ...)(L959–962)
Because upload_part_copy() does not enforce source GetObject authorization, the server reads and copies victim data even when the requester lacks permission.
Affected Versions
- Tested vulnerable on:
main@c1d5106acc3480c275a52344df84633bb6dcd8f0 - Git describe:
1.0.0-alpha.86-3-gc1d5106a
The fail-open authorization behavior for UploadPartCopy was introduced in:
- Commit:
09ea11c13(pergit blameonrustfs/src/storage/access.rs:1443-1448)
Affected range (recommended wording):
- All versions from commit
09ea11c13throughc1d5106acc3480c275a52344df84633bb6dcd8f0(and likely any releases containing those commits) until a fix is applied.
Package version (Cargo metadata)
rustfscrate version in this tree: 0.0.5 (cargo metadata)
Proof of Concept (PoC) – Real Commands + Verified Results
Files
Place the PoC script at the repository root:
- PoC script:
poc_uploadpartcopy_exfil_v3.sh - Captured output:
poc_v3_output.txt - (Optional) Redacted debug log:
upload_part_copy_debug_redacted.log(Authorization/signature redacted)
Environment
RustFS running locally (Docker is simplest), listening on:
http://127.0.0.1:9000
Tools:
awscli,jq,awscurl
Steps to Reproduce
- Start RustFS (example):
docker compose -f docker-compose-simple.yml up -d
- Run the PoC and save output:
chmod +x poc_uploadpartcopy_exfil_v3.sh
./poc_uploadpartcopy_exfil_v3.sh | tee poc_v3_output.txt
Attachments
Expected Behavior
-
Attacker operations against victim bucket should be denied:
ListObjects-> AccessDeniedHeadObject-> AccessDeniedGetObject-> AccessDeniedCopyObject-> AccessDenied
-
UploadPartCopyfrom victim -> attacker multipart should also be denied.
Actual Behavior
- All direct operations against victim are denied (as expected),
- but
UploadPartCopysucceeds, and attacker retrieves the copied object from attacker bucket.
Observed PoC Output
Victim uploads a private object:
- size:
5,242,880bytes - sha256:
fda018db1da9d8f4c1b287c75943384a3b4ede391ec156039b6d94e17d6ad68f
Attacker exfiltrates it via multipart copy:
- stolen size:
5,242,880bytes - stolen sha256:
fda018db1da9d8f4c1b287c75943384a3b4ede391ec156039b6d94e17d6ad68f
Proof:
- hashes and sizes match (victim == stolen) -> unauthorized cross-bucket read confirmed.
Network Evidence (Redacted)
The debug log shows a successful request with:
- HTTP method:
PUT - destination:
/<attacker-bucket>/<dst-key>?partNumber=1&uploadId=... - header:
x-amz-copy-source: <victim-bucket>/private/finance_dump.bin - response:
HTTP/1.1 200with<CopyPartResult><ETag>...</ETag>...</CopyPartResult>
Fix
Implement authorization checks equivalent to copy_object() for multipart copy paths:
-
upload_part_copy:- enforce source
GetObjectauthorization onx-amz-copy-source - enforce destination
PutObjectauthorization on the target object - (recommended) apply the same tag-condition enforcement used by
copy_object()on the source.
- enforce source
-
complete_multipart_upload:- enforce destination
PutObjectauthorization
- enforce destination
-
abort_multipart_upload:- enforce appropriate multipart permission (or destination
PutObjectas a safe boundary)
- enforce appropriate multipart permission (or destination
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard