Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-mr3j-p26x-72x4

MediumCVSS 5.3 / 10
Published Mar 20, 2026·Last modified Mar 25, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

An authenticated user can read any task comment by ID, regardless of whether they have access to the task the comment belongs to, by substituting the task ID in the API URL with a task they do have access to.

Details

The GET /api/v1/tasks/{taskID}/comments/{commentID} endpoint performs an authorization check against the task ID provided in the URL path, then loads the comment by its own ID without verifying it belongs to that task.

Root Cause

In pkg/models/task_comment_permissions.go, CanRead constructs a Task using the TaskID from the URL and checks Task.CanRead:

func (tc *TaskComment) CanRead(s *xorm.Session, a web.Auth) (bool, int, error) {
    t := Task{ID: tc.TaskID}
    return t.CanRead(s, a)
}

In pkg/models/task_comments.go, getTaskCommentSimple loads the comment by ID only, with NoAutoCondition() explicitly disabling XORM's implicit struct-field filtering:

func getTaskCommentSimple(s *xorm.Session, tc *TaskComment) error {
    exists, err := s.
        Where("id = ?", tc.ID).
        NoAutoCondition().
        Get(tc)
    // ...
}

The generic web handler (pkg/web/handler/read_one.go) calls CanRead before ReadOne, so the permission check passes against the attacker-controlled task ID, and then ReadOne returns the comment from a completely different task.

Attack Scenario

  1. Attacker is authenticated and has read access to any task (task ID A) — e.g. their own task.
  2. Attacker guesses or enumerates a comment ID (C) belonging to a task in another user's private project.
  3. Attacker requests: GET /api/v1/tasks/A/comments/C
  4. Authorization passes because the attacker can read task A.
  5. The comment C is loaded by ID only and returned, leaking its contents and author.

Credit

This vulnerability was found using GitHub Security Lab Taskflows.

Risk Scores
Base Score
5.3

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
1.3

Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.

EPSS
0.25%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard