Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-mpcw-3j5p-p99x

Published Oct 24, 2024·Last modified Dec 4, 2024
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

Usage of the Butterfly.prototype.parseJSON or getJSON functions on an attacker-controlled crafted input string allows the attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code on the server.

Since Butterfly JavaScript code has access to Java classes, it can run arbitrary programs.

Details

The parseJSON function (edu/mit/simile/butterfly/Butterfly.js:64) works by calling eval, an approach that goes back to the original library by Crockford, before JSON was part of the ECMAScript language. It uses a regular expression to remove strings from the input, then checks that there are no unexpected characters in the non-string remainder.

However, the regex is imperfect, as was discovered earlier by Mike Samuel; specifically, the "cleaner" can be tricked into treating part of the input as a string that the "evaluator" does not, because of a difference in interpretation regarding the the Unicode zero-width joiner character. Representing that character with a visible symbol, a malicious input looks like:

"\�\", Packages.java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec('gnome-calculator')) // "

This is understood...

  • by JSON_cleaning_RE as a single string, and because it is a string it can be collapsed to nothing, which is not problematic, so the original input proceeds to eval.
  • by the eval function, which ignores zero-width joiners entirely, as a string containing a single escaped backslash, followed by a comma, then a function call, closing parenthesis, and finally a line comment.

The function call is evaluated, and a calculator is opened.

Possible mitigations and additional defenses could include:

  • Replacing the JSON implementation with Rhino's built-in implementation.
  • Dropping all JSON-related and JSONP-related code entirely.
  • Restricting the access the JavaScript controller code has to the rest of the system by using initSafeStandardObjects instead of initStandardObjects, using setClassShutter, and so on.

PoC

Change OpenRefine core controller.js to add a call to the vulnerable getJSON function:

diff --git a/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js b/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
index 4ceba0676..1ce0936d2 100644
--- a/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
+++ b/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
@@ -631,0 +632,5 @@ function process(path, request, response) {
+    if (path == "getjsontest") {
+      butterfly.getJSON(request);
+      return true;
+    }
+

Then, restart OpenRefine and submit the malicious request. For example, the following bash command (with $' quoting) should do it:

curl -H 'Content-Type: application/json;charset=utf-8' --data $'"\\\u200d\\", Packages.java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec(\'gnome-calculator\')) // "' http://localhost:3333/getjsontest

Impact

Any JavaScript controller that calls one of these functions is vulnerable to remote code execution.

OpenRefine itself seems unaffected; both OpenRefine and jQuery have their own functions also called parseJSON and getJSON, but those are unrelated.

Risk Scores
Base Score
0.0

Measures severity based on intrinsic characteristics of the vulnerability, independent of environment.

Threat Intelligence
0.0

No exploitation activity has been observed at this time. Continue routine monitoring.

EPSS
N/A

Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard