Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-m8vh-jmq9-5rjg
| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Ecosystem | npm |
| Package | @nestjs/microservices |
| Affected versions | >= 12.0.0, < 12.0.2 and < 11.2.4 |
| Patched versions | 12.0.2 and 11.2.4 (upgrade to 12.0.3 / 11.2.5) |
Summary
A single message whose pattern is a deeply nested object terminates a NestJS microservice that uses the TCP or
RabbitMQ transport. The server serialized the client-supplied pattern with JSON.stringify to derive the handler
lookup key; on deeply nested input this throws RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded. The exception escaped
the asynchronous message handler as an unhandled promise rejection, which terminates the Node.js process under the
default --unhandled-rejections=throw.
Impact
Denial of service, one message per crash, repeatable. The attacker needs to be able to reach the transport: connect to the TCP transport's port, or publish to the queue or exchange the service consumes from. The TCP transport performs no authentication by default, so on a reachable port this requires nothing else.
Only the TCP and RabbitMQ transports are affected. The other transports take the pattern as a string from the broker topic or channel and never serialize a client-supplied object to build it.
Details
In ServerTCP#handleMessage and ServerRMQ#handleMessage the pattern was stringified without a guard:
const pattern = isString(packet.pattern)
? packet.pattern
: JSON.stringify(packet.pattern);
JSON.parse accepts nesting depths that JSON.stringify cannot re-serialize, because JSON.stringify recurses
natively, so an attacker can craft a payload that parses successfully on arrival and then throws when the pattern is
converted back to a string. Neither transport attached a rejection handler to the promise returned by
handleMessage, so the RangeError propagated out as an unhandled rejection.
Proof of concept
Against a NestJS microservice on the TCP transport (default port 3001). The nested JSON is built as text rather than
with JSON.stringify, which is what makes the payload serializable by the attacker but not by the victim:
const { connect } = require('node:net');
const DEPTH = 100_000;
const pattern = '{"nested":'.repeat(DEPTH) + '{}' + '}'.repeat(DEPTH);
const payload = `{"pattern":${pattern},"data":null,"id":"1"}`;
const socket = connect(3001, '127.0.0.1', () => {
// Nest's TCP framing is <byteLength>#<json>
socket.write(`${Buffer.byteLength(payload)}#${payload}`);
});
The service exits with RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded. The equivalent payload published to the
consumed queue crashes a RabbitMQ-transport service.
Patches
Fixed in 12.0.2 and 11.2.4.
- Incoming patterns are converted through a guarded
Server#getPatternAsString, which falls back to a sentinel value that matches no handler. Such a message now receives the ordinary "no message handler" response (TCP) or is negatively acknowledged (RabbitMQ) instead of crashing the process. - Rejections escaping
handleMessagein both transports are routed tohandleErrorrather than left unhandled.
Workarounds
If you cannot upgrade, restrict network access to the transport so that only trusted peers can reach it. Running the
process with --unhandled-rejections=warn prevents the crash but leaves the message unprocessed and is not a
substitute for the fix.
Credit
Reported by ZeroVuln Labs.
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard